MHB How Do You Write an Expression for the Cost of Running a Machine?

AI Thread Summary
The cost of running a machine consists of fixed and variable components, represented as a function of the number of parts machined. The expression for total cost can be formulated as C(x) = Mx + F, where M is the marginal cost per part and F represents fixed costs. There is some confusion regarding the terminology of "partly constant and partly varies," but it essentially indicates that one component remains constant while the other changes with production volume. Different variable representations can still lead to the same conclusion about cost calculation. Understanding these components is crucial for accurate cost estimation in machine operations.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
The cost of running a machine is partly constant and partly varies as the number of parts machined. Write an expression to show the cost?

My Reasoning:

Let C = cost

Let x = partly constant

Let y = partly varies

Let k = constant of proportionality

C = x + yk

Right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would have thought "partly constant and partly varies" means one part varies, and one part is constant.. Since a varying constant is.. well, a variable? I'm not sure though. The wording is strange with this one.
 
Let's let $F$ be the fixed costs and $M$ be the marginal cost (the cost to machine one part), and $x$ be the number of parts machined. Then the total cost $C$ would be given by:

$$C(x)=Mx+F$$
 
MarkFL said:
Let's let $F$ be the fixed costs and $M$ be the marginal cost (the cost to machine one part), and $x$ be the number of parts machined. Then the total cost $C$ would be given by:

$$C(x)=Mx+F$$

We used different variables but correct nonetheless.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top