How Does a Nucleus's Mass Change After Emitting a Gamma-Ray Photon?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the mass change of a nucleus after emitting a gamma-ray photon, with an emphasis on using conservation of 4-momentum and energy principles. Participants are trying to derive the mass difference equation, specifically addressing the nuances of momentum conservation and the signs in the equations. One contributor successfully arrives at the expected result but questions the sign used in their calculations. Clarifications are sought regarding the application of vector forms in momentum conservation, highlighting the complexity of the problem. The conversation illustrates the challenges in applying theoretical physics concepts to practical problems.
Pedro de la Torre

Homework Statement


A stationary excited nucleus decays to its grpund state by emitting a γ-ray photon of energy Eγ. The grpund state nucleus recoils in the opposite direction at speed v. Show that when v<<c the change of mass of the nucleus is approximately:

me - mg = Eγ/c2 [1+ 1/2(v/c)]

Homework Equations


v/c=pc/E
PμPμ = constant = (mc2)2
E2 = (mc2)2 + (pc)2
Pγc = Eγ

The Attempt at a Solution


I used both, the cuadrimomentum conservation and the energy conservation. I think the solution should be directly found from the cuadrimomentum conservation, but I can not solve it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pedro de la Torre said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I used both, the cuadrimomentum conservation and the energy conservation.
Conservation of 4-momentum implies conservation of both relativistic energy and relativistic 3-momentum.

I think the solution should be directly found from the cuadrimomentum conservation, but I can not solve it.
I'm not following what you mean here. It would be helpful if you showed some detail of your attempt to solve it this way.
 

Attachments

  • WhatsApp Image 2017-10-02 at 2.14.21 PM.jpeg
    WhatsApp Image 2017-10-02 at 2.14.21 PM.jpeg
    17.3 KB · Views: 628
Your work looks good, except I don't understand why you suddenly put in a negative sign at the very end. ##\frac{E_{\gamma}}{E_g}## is positive. ##E_{\gamma} = |p_{\gamma}|c##.
So, ##1 + \frac{E_{\gamma}}{2 E_g} = 1+ \frac{v}{2c}##.

upload_2017-10-2_12-46-4.png
 
Last edited:
I did that because I considered there Pg = - Pγ. But I think I am realising that this is only for the vectorial form, Isn´t it?
 
Pedro de la Torre said:
I did that because I considered there Pg = - Pγ. But I think I am realising that this is only for the vectorial form, Isn´t it?
Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K