How Does Acceleration Relate Between Two Blocks in a Frictionless Pulley System?

In summary, the system shown has no friction anywhere, and as the system is released, block m1 moves downward. If the magnitude of the acceleration of block m1 is a, what is the magnitude of the acceleration of block m2?
  • #36
Yes, T = Mg. If T = 2Mg, then the net force on each mass would not be zero, and you would see both of them moving upwards with an acceleration of g.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Okay, got it. Perfect. Thanks.
 
  • #38
Hi, guys,

Could you tell me if I am on the right track:

in this problem the magnitude of the acceleration of block m1 would be:

g*(m1/m2)?

m1*g-(m2*2*g)/2 [if T=T/2)
 
  • #39
Poetria said:
Hi, guys,

Could you tell me if I am on the right track:

in this problem the magnitude of the acceleration of block m1 would be:

g*(m1/m2)?

m1*g-(m2*2*g)/2 [if T=T/2)[/QUOTE]
Consider what that would imply if m1<m2.
Instead of guessing, just write out the ##\Sigma F = ma## equation for each mass.
 
  • Like
Likes Poetria
  • #40
I have already done this but something is messed up.

For the mass 1
m1*a=m1*g-T

For the mass 2
m2*2*a=m2*2g-T/2

I understand that m2 would move to the left even if its mass was bigger than m1. Yes, that's my problem. I don't know how to combine the equations.
 
  • #41
Poetria said:
m2*2g
Where does that term come from?
 
  • Like
Likes Poetria
  • #42
I thought that for the mass 2 acceleration =2a.
a - acceleration of the mass 1
Well, it is suspect. I will think of it.
 
  • #43
Poetria said:
I thought that for the mass 2 acceleration =2a.
a - acceleration of the mass 1
Well, it is suspect. I will think of it.
That's correct. It's the m2*g term that I asked about.
 
  • #44
I am somewhat farther but there is a mistake in a physical interpretation. Signs are messed up again.

Here you have my equations:

m(1)*g-T=m(1)*a

T=m(1)*(g-a)

m(1)*g-m(1)*(g-a)=m(1)*a

m(1)*g-m(1)*(g-a) + T/2=m(2)*2*a

m(1)*g-m(1)*(g-a) + (m(1)*(g-a))/2 = m(2)*2*a

2*m(1)*g-2*m(1)*(g-a) + (m(1)*(g-a)) = m(2)*4*a

m(1)*a+m(1)*g=m(2)*4*a

a=(-m(1)*g)/(m(1)-4*m(2))

I tried to take a photo but it wasn't legible. I should learn LaTex
 
  • #45
Poetria said:
m(1)*g-m(1)*(g-a) + T/2=m(2)*2*a
I don't understand where that comes from.
Let's have an equation that only involves m2, not m1.
You don't need LaTeX for this, just use subscripts and superscripts. They're the X2 and X2 symbols above where you type.
If you can't be bothered to use those, use m and M for the two masses.
But whatever, please do not post images of handwritten working!

If you do embark on LaTeX, a useful trick is to right-click on LaTeX someone else has posted and select Show Math As -> Tex. You can then copy the text that appears. Just add a double hash (# # with no space in between) at each end.
 
  • #46
Ok, many thanks. I will try to work this out in this way.

I thought m(1)*g-m(1)*(g-a) is a force excerted on the pulley to which m(2) is attached and T/2 - the tension of a string for m(2). But if you don't understand this it is obvously wrong.

I have drawn this: It is strange because apart from minus signs the solution was correct but I don't understand it so it is not useful anyway.
 

Attachments

  • FBD for mass2.png
    FBD for mass2.png
    2.5 KB · Views: 446
Last edited:
Back
Top