- #1
stripedcat
- 44
- 0
I have the solution so to speak, but I'd like some explanation for it. You do not have to type out the explanation yourself if you have a link to something that might shed insight. I don't know all of the format commands for the math yet, so forgive me for the formatting issues that are bound to crop up.
Okay, here we go!
Under ideal conditions, air pressure decreases continuously with the height above sea level at a rate proportional to the pressure at that height. The barometer reads 30 inches at sea level and 15 inches at 18,000 feet. Find the barometric pressure at 35,000 feet.
dp/dh = kp, P(0)=30
\(\displaystyle P(h) = 30e^{kh}\)
First question is, how are we getting that second equation there? I see where the number and variables come from but I'm not quite sure how they were arranged that way.
Our first h value is 18,000
\(\displaystyle P(18,000) = 30e^{18,000k}\)
As stated in the problem, this will be = 15, right? Not sure if that's important, just wanted to verify.
k = ln(1/2)/18,000
I don't know where they got that ln (1/2) from though I do know it's going to become -ln(2)/18,000
I could continue the problem, but that last bit there is what I really need answered. I have knowledge gaps in my math, so I'm sure I'm missing something.
Okay, here we go!
Under ideal conditions, air pressure decreases continuously with the height above sea level at a rate proportional to the pressure at that height. The barometer reads 30 inches at sea level and 15 inches at 18,000 feet. Find the barometric pressure at 35,000 feet.
dp/dh = kp, P(0)=30
\(\displaystyle P(h) = 30e^{kh}\)
First question is, how are we getting that second equation there? I see where the number and variables come from but I'm not quite sure how they were arranged that way.
Our first h value is 18,000
\(\displaystyle P(18,000) = 30e^{18,000k}\)
As stated in the problem, this will be = 15, right? Not sure if that's important, just wanted to verify.
k = ln(1/2)/18,000
I don't know where they got that ln (1/2) from though I do know it's going to become -ln(2)/18,000
I could continue the problem, but that last bit there is what I really need answered. I have knowledge gaps in my math, so I'm sure I'm missing something.