- #1
silverwhale
- 84
- 2
Hi Everybody,
I am learning solid state physics and read today through Kittel. I am still stuck at the proof of Blochs theorem i.e. the proof of Blochs function.
For the Schrodinger equation of a periodic potential the general ansatz:
[tex] \psi = \sum_k C_k e^{ikr} [/tex]
is made.
Then, by looking at the Schrodinger equation in the reciprocal lattice, we see that the [itex] C_k [/itex] are a linear combination of [itex] C_{k-G} [/itex], where [itex]G[/itex] is the reciprocal lattice vector.
Finally, the wave function is indexed by an index [itex] k [/itex] and rewritten as:
[tex] \psi_k = \sum_G C_{k-G} e^{i(k-G)r}, [/tex]
where the sum goes now over G.
I have two questions:
1) How can we go from the sum over k to a sum over G?
2) Is [itex] \psi_k [/itex] the same function as [itex] \psi [/itex]? If so, why do we index it with k?
I hope this is clear enough, and I would be glad for ANY answer! :)
I am searching for an ansatz for nearly a week now!
I am learning solid state physics and read today through Kittel. I am still stuck at the proof of Blochs theorem i.e. the proof of Blochs function.
For the Schrodinger equation of a periodic potential the general ansatz:
[tex] \psi = \sum_k C_k e^{ikr} [/tex]
is made.
Then, by looking at the Schrodinger equation in the reciprocal lattice, we see that the [itex] C_k [/itex] are a linear combination of [itex] C_{k-G} [/itex], where [itex]G[/itex] is the reciprocal lattice vector.
Finally, the wave function is indexed by an index [itex] k [/itex] and rewritten as:
[tex] \psi_k = \sum_G C_{k-G} e^{i(k-G)r}, [/tex]
where the sum goes now over G.
I have two questions:
1) How can we go from the sum over k to a sum over G?
2) Is [itex] \psi_k [/itex] the same function as [itex] \psi [/itex]? If so, why do we index it with k?
I hope this is clear enough, and I would be glad for ANY answer! :)
I am searching for an ansatz for nearly a week now!