How does centripetal acceleration can cancel out gravity?

In summary, the minimum constant speed a motorcyclist needs in order to make it around a vertical loop with a radius of 3 meters is 5.4m/s.
  • #1
student34
639
21

Homework Statement



I know the answer and how to get it, but it doesn't make sense because ac points down and so does g. So why do they seem to cancel each other out?

What is the minimum constant speed a motorbiker needs in order to make it around a vertical loop with a radius of 3 meters?

Homework Equations



I know that I have to make ac = g.
So, ac = 9.8m/s^2.
v = √(r*ac)

The Attempt at a Solution



v = √(r*ac) = √(3*9.8) = 5.4m/s

This all seems to imply that ac and g cancel out, but how can they when they are both in the same direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I know the answer and how to get it, but it doesn't make sense because ac points down and so does g. So why do they seem to cancel each other out?
They don't - what you have worked out is the speed in which the centripetal force is supplied entirely by gravity at the top of the loop. That is why the acceleration and gravity point in the same direction - the acceleration is supplied by the gravity.

You experience weight by the ground pushing against you. If you were in free-fall, inside a box that is also in free-fall, the floor no longer pushes against you and you feel weightless. But gravity is not "cancelled out". It is similar for the motorcycle.

If the motorcyclist went any faster, some additional centripetal force will be needed.
That will come from the normal force between the bike and the track ... i.e. if he went faster, he'd feel the track pushing against him. At exactly the speed you worked out, the track does not push against him at all, giving the feeling of not having any weight.
 
  • #3
In addition to what Simon Bridge already said, it's useful here to recall Newton's second law of motion.

[tex] m \vec a = \sum_i \vec F_i [/tex]

Here there are two forces, the normal force exerted from the track on the motorbiker, and the force of gravity exerted on the motorbiker.

In the critical case which you're already calculated, what is the normal force exerted from the track on the motorbiker? [Edit: when at the very top of the loop.]

Is the motorbiker accelerating? If so, how much, and in what direction, recalling [itex] m \vec a = \sum \vec F [/itex]?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
F=ma, your force and acceleration should be in the same direction, as you indicated. If the net forces on a body don't equal zero, the body will accelerate as is the case for centripetal acceleration.

The problem statement is kind of silly, because centripetal acceleration doesn't "cancel" gravity, it is simply the response of a body subjected to the force of gravity.

[edit, I didn't see the motorcycle part. I thought it was an open ended question about orbits]
 
Last edited:
  • #5
student34 said:

Homework Statement



I know the answer and how to get it, but it doesn't make sense because ac points down and so does g. So why do they seem to cancel each other out?

What is the minimum constant speed a motorbiker needs in order to make it around a vertical loop with a radius of 3 meters?

Homework Equations



I know that I have to make ac = g.
So, ac = 9.8m/s^2.
v = √(r*ac)

The Attempt at a Solution



v = √(r*ac) = √(3*9.8) = 5.4m/s

This all seems to imply that ac and g cancel out, but how can they when they are both in the same direction?
It's not that the centripetal force cancels the gravitational force.

If the magnitude of the centripetal force required to make an object follow the circular path is equal to, or greater than, the gravitational force, then the track (or roadway, or whatever structure) must provide either no force, or additional downward force.

Otherwise, if the magnitude of the centripetal force required to make an object follow the circular path is less than, the gravitational force, then the track would need to provide an upward force in order for the object to follow that circular path.
 
  • #6
collinsmark said:
In addition to what Simon Bridge already said, it's useful here to recall Newton's second law of motion.

[tex] m \vec a = \sum_i \vec F_i [/tex]

Here there are two forces, the normal force exerted from the track on the motorbiker, and the force of gravity exerted on the motorbiker.

In the critical case which you're already calculated, what is the normal force exerted from the track on the motorbiker? [Edit: when at the very top of the loop.]
I guess it would be zero.

Is the motorbiker accelerating? If so, how much, and in what direction, recalling [itex] m \vec a = \sum \vec F [/itex]?

I understand it is 9.8m/s^2 downward.
 
  • #7
student34 said:
I guess it would be zero.

I understand it is 9.8m/s^2 downward.

Yes! Good job. :approve:
 
  • #8
collinsmark said:
Yes! Good job. :approve:

Thanks!
 

FAQ: How does centripetal acceleration can cancel out gravity?

What is centripetal acceleration and how does it relate to gravity?

Centripetal acceleration is the acceleration that an object experiences when it moves in a circular path. It always points towards the center of the circle and is caused by a force acting on the object. This force is often provided by gravity, as in the case of a planet orbiting around a star.

How can centripetal acceleration cancel out gravity?

When an object is in circular motion, its centripetal acceleration is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction to the force causing it. In the case of a planet orbiting around a star, the force of gravity acts towards the center of the orbit, while the centripetal acceleration points away from the center. These two forces cancel out and the object remains in a stable orbit.

Can centripetal acceleration completely cancel out gravity?

No, centripetal acceleration can only cancel out enough of the force of gravity to keep the object in a circular orbit. The force of gravity will always be present, but its effect can be balanced by the centripetal acceleration.

What happens if the centripetal acceleration is not enough to cancel out gravity?

If the centripetal acceleration is not enough to counteract the force of gravity, the object will either fall towards the center of the circular path (if the centripetal acceleration is too low) or fly out of its orbit (if the centripetal acceleration is too high).

Are there any real life examples of centripetal acceleration cancelling out gravity?

Yes, the most common example is the orbit of planets around the sun. The centripetal acceleration provided by the gravitational force of the sun keeps the planets in their orbits. Another example is the rotation of the moon around the Earth, where the force of gravity between the two objects creates the necessary centripetal acceleration for the moon to stay in its orbit.

Similar threads

Back
Top