How Does Faraday's Law Explain Zero Work by Magnetic Forces in Motional EMFs?

In summary, the conversation revolves around understanding electromagnetic induction and Faraday's law. The concept of emf for a conducting loop moving in a magnetic field is discussed, with a focus on the closed loop integral of (v cross B) dot dl. The question of whether the magnetic force does work is raised, and it is clarified that the work done in pushing a particle through a conductor does not come from the magnetic force, but from an external force. The relationship between work done and energy dissipated in the circuit is also mentioned. A recommended paper for further reading is also provided.
  • #1
Aubin
2
0
Hello,

I am currently trying to really come to grips with electromagnetic induction and Faraday's law.

The text I'm using is Young and Freedman's University Physics, 12th edition.

How can the emf for a conducting loop moving in a magnetic field be given by the closed loop integral of (v cross B) dot dl where dl is an infinitesimal loop element, when (the way I understand it) that essentially represents work per unit charge done by the MAGNETIC force? And of course we know that the magnetic force does zero work. This is where I'm confused. Also, when we do work to keep such a loop moving, we move it against a magnetic force, how come (as my book says) the magnetic force does no (negative) work as we move this wire?

Thanks

Aubin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What an interesting question!

As you say, the magnetic force never does any work on the particle, because:

dW = q(vxB).ds = q(vxB).vdt = 0

Here, ds is an element of the particle’s path.

Now let's consider the particles constrained to move along a conductor. Let the velocity through space in our frame of reference of an element dl of the conductor be vcond, and let the velocity, dl/dt of the particles relative to the conductor be vrel.

Then our formula becomes

dW = q{(vcond+vrel)xB}.(vcond+vrel)dt = 0

The terms involving just vcond in the brackets either side of the dot clearly amount to zero, as do the terms with just vrel. So we are left with the heterogeneous terms

q{vcondxB}.vreldt + q{vrelxB}.vconddt = 0

that is

q{vcondxB}.dl + q{vrelxB}.vconddt = 0

Note that here we're using dl as originally defined - as a directed element of the conductor, rather than as a displacement of the particle through space (for which we're using ds).

Now, in the second term, q{vrelxB} is the ‘BIL’ motor effect force contributed by q on the element of the conductor, so - {vrelxB} is the external force needed to keep the element moving at constant speed, so - q{vrelxB}.vconddt is the work an external agency has to do to keep the wire moving at constant speed. So:

Work done by external agency = - q{vrelxB}.vconddt
=q {vcondxB}.dl
= work done pushing q along the conductor

Hope you like this. It shows that the work done pushing q through the conductor does not come from the magnetic force, but from another, external force.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Yes, that makes sense, thank you very much. (Took a while to digest because my vector algebra was a bit rusty from last term). This also shows very clearly why the work done must equal the energy dissipated in the circuit doesn't it?
 
  • #4
A very nice pedagogical paper on the subject is

P. J. Scanlon, R. N. Henriksen, J. R. Allen, Approaches to Electromagnetic Induction, Am. J. Phys. 37, 698 (1969)
 
  • #5


Hello Aubin,

I understand your confusion about Faraday's Law and motional emfs. Let me try to explain it in a simpler way.

Faraday's Law states that a changing magnetic field can induce an electric current in a conductor. This is because a changing magnetic field creates a changing magnetic flux, which in turn induces an electric field. This electric field then causes charges to move, creating an electric current.

Now, when a conducting loop is moving in a magnetic field, the charges inside the loop experience a magnetic force due to the interaction between the magnetic field and the moving charges. This magnetic force does not do any work on the charges, as you correctly pointed out. However, this magnetic force does cause the charges to move, which creates an electric current, as explained by Faraday's Law.

The equation you mentioned, emf = (v x B) · dl, represents the work done by the electric field on the charges as they move along the loop. This work is equal to the emf (electromotive force), which is the potential difference created by the electric field. This equation is derived from Faraday's Law, as it takes into account the motion of the loop and the direction of the magnetic field.

In summary, while the magnetic force does not do work on the charges, it does cause them to move, creating an electric current. And it is this electric current that ultimately creates the emf, as described by Faraday's Law. I hope this helps clarify your understanding of Faraday's Law and motional emfs. Keep practicing and don't hesitate to ask for further clarification if needed.

Best,
 

FAQ: How Does Faraday's Law Explain Zero Work by Magnetic Forces in Motional EMFs?

What is Faraday's Law?

Faraday's Law, also known as Faraday's Induction Law, states that a changing magnetic field will induce an electric field and therefore, an electric current in a conductor.

What is an example of Faraday's Law in action?

One example of Faraday's Law in action is the use of generators to produce electricity. The rotating coil in a generator induces an electric current through Faraday's Law.

What is a motional EMF?

A motional EMF, or electromagnetic force, is the voltage generated by the motion of a conductor through a magnetic field.

How is motional EMF related to Faraday's Law?

Motional EMF is a direct result of Faraday's Law, as the motion of a conductor through a magnetic field creates a changing magnetic flux which induces an electric field and an EMF.

What factors affect the magnitude of the motional EMF?

The magnitude of the motional EMF is affected by the strength of the magnetic field, the velocity of the conductor, and the length of the conductor within the magnetic field.

Back
Top