How Does Friction Affect the Rolling Motion of a Sphere?

In summary: Neither is true. If there is a torque on the ball, it will both roll and slide. It's that simple.yet once it's speed drops it beings to roll? Since the force of friction doesn't change, why would it not roll initially (and only slide)?Because when it's rolling and sliding, the net force on the ball is small enough that the torque of friction is large enough to produce an acceleration of the center of mass which is less than the acceleration due to gravity on the center of mass. In order for it to roll and not slide, the net force on the ball must be zero. In order for it to slide and not roll, the
  • #1
zmike
139
0
A perfect uniform sphere is thrown horizontally on to the floor. It slides on the floor then it begins rollings soon after. Draw a complete FBD and diagram for the motion before and after the rolling.

->My problem is does the kinetic friction act in the same direction as the balls motion or opposite to it BEFORE it begins to roll?

->Do I draw kinetic friction acting on the center of the mass of the ball BEFORE it rolls? or does it only act on the bottom edge of the ball?

it seems to me that friction can only act on the bottom but in previous units in the textbook, friction appears to act on the center of mass?


please reply. thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Friction acts at the point of contact, where ball and floor meet. As far as the direction in which friction acts, what do you think?
 
  • #3
I think that if the sphere is slipping and not rolling then it acts on the center of mass therefore the friction produces NO torque. Is that correct? b/c my textbooks doesn't accurately describe the motion.
 
  • #4
zmike said:
I think that if the sphere is slipping and not rolling then it acts on the center of mass therefore the friction produces NO torque. Is that correct?
No, that's not correct. For one thing, friction is a contact force, not a long range force, so it always acts at the point of contact. As soon as the ball hits the floor, friction acts to make it start rolling (by exerting a torque) and to slow it down (due to it's effect on the linear motion of the center of mass).

Realize that you can use the net force on an object to determine the acceleration of its center of mass regardless of where the actual forces act on the object.

b/c my textbooks doesn't accurately describe the motion.
What does your textbook say exactly?
 
  • #5
How is it possible for an object to be slipping while there is a torque acting on it? b/c there is no equation that can describe that sort of motion in my textbook)

->My textbook states that an object can only either be
1) Rolling and not slipping (torque/friction acting on point of contact)
2) Slipping and not rolling

It sounds like that if there is torque, there cannot be slipping

I would expect for the 2nd case that friction acts against the direction of motion on the CENTER OF MASS (just like with FBD of linear motion of a box being pushed, in the FBD you would draw friction extending from the center of mass). If the friction only acts on the bottom of the sphere then my FBD wouldn't make any sense, since there would be no friction slowing down the point at the center of mass.

Can you please help me clarify this?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
  • #6
zmike said:
How is it possible for an object to be slipping while there is a torque acting on it?
"Slipping" just means that the point of contact is sliding along the surface. If there's a torque on it, it will both slide and roll.
b/c there is no equation that can describe that sort of motion in my textbook)
What book are you using?

->My textbook states that an object can only either be
1) Rolling and not slipping (torque/friction acting on point of contact)
2) Slipping and not rolling
That's not true. Let's stick to the case of a horizontal surface. The object can:
1) Roll without slipping. Note that once this condition is realized the friction force becomes zero.
2) Slip without rolling. (Otherwise known as pure "sliding".) This happens if there's no friction.
3) Roll with slipping. When you first drop that ball onto the surface with a forward velocity, the ball will both slip and begin to roll (due to the torque from friction).

It sounds like that if there is torque, there cannot be slipping
Nah.

I would expect for the 2nd case that friction acts against the direction of motion on the CENTER OF MASS (just like with FBD of linear motion of a box being pushed, in the FBD you would draw friction extending from the center of mass). If the friction only acts on the bottom of the sphere then my FBD wouldn't make any sense, since there would be no friction slowing down the point at the center of mass.
This is incorrect thinking for several reasons:

(1) Friction always acts at the point of contact. It would be quite magical if it could act somewhere else.

(2) For the purpose of analyzing the translational motion, it doesn't matter where the force acts. Its effect on the center of mass will be the same. The friction force at the point of contact will most definitely act to slow down the sliding ball.

(3) The force of friction does two things: It produces an acceleration of the center of mass (negative, in this case, slowing the ball down) and it produces a torque about the center of mass, which starts the ball rolling faster and faster. At some point, when the translational and angular speed meet the condition for "rolling without slipping" (v = ωr), then it will maintain that speed (under perfect conditions, of course).
 
  • #7
thanks,

one last thing, if there is a non-zero torque on an object, wouldn't that mean the object must be rolling?

so in this case, why is the sphere sliding (translational motion) while there is a torque caused by friction? yet once it's speed drops it beings to roll? Since the force of friction doesn't change, why would it not roll initially (and only slide)?

thanks
 
Last edited:
  • #8
zmike said:
one last thing, if there is a non-zero torque on an object, wouldn't that mean the object must be rolling?
A non-zero torque means that the object has an angular acceleration, thus its rotational speed is changing.

so in this case, why is the sphere sliding (translational motion) while there is a torque caused by friction?
Why not? You seem to be stuck with the idea that something is either rolling but not sliding or sliding but not rolling. The sphere has no problem both sliding and rolling.

The sphere continues to slide because its translational speed (v) is greater than the rotational speed about the center (ωr).
yet once it's speed drops it beings to roll? Since the force of friction doesn't change, why would it not roll initially (and only slide)?
It begins rolling immediately, but it's still sliding as well. (It starts with zero rotational speed.)

Consider this similar problem. What if you gently dropped onto the floor a rotating ball which had no translational speed? What happens then? What does the friction force do?
 
  • #9
Thanks,

but would it be possible for an object to exhibit no rolling and only sliding while there is torque acting on the object in 1 direction?-> Regarding the direction of the friction. If the sphere ended with a positive angular velocity (it rotates clockwise). Doesn't that mean that friction must be in the same direction of motion as the sphere? or else why would it's angular velocity be increasing in that direction?

Consider this similar problem. What if you gently dropped onto the floor a rotating ball which had no translational speed? What happens then? What does the friction force do?

Common sense tells me that it would move forward if w is positive but that would mean that friction force is in the same direction of the motion of the ball which seems odd. How does friction which is suppose to slow things down, speed the ball up?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
zmike said:
but would it be possible for an object to exhibit no rolling and only sliding while there is torque acting on the object in 1 direction?
No.

-> Regarding the direction of the friction. If the sphere ended with a positive angular velocity (it rotates clockwise). Doesn't that mean that friction must be in the same direction of motion as the sphere? or else why would it's angular velocity be increasing in that direction?
The direction of angular velocity increase is given by the direction of the torque. Since friction, which points in a direction opposite to the translational motion of the sphere, creates a clockwise torque the angular velocity increases in the clockwise direction. Of course, since friction opposes the direction of the translational motion, the ball's translational speed decreases.

Common sense tells me that it would move forward if w is positive but that would mean that friction force is in the same direction of the motion of the ball which seems odd. How does friction which is suppose to slow things down, speed the ball up?
Friction always acts to oppose slipping between surfaces. In this case, the ball's surface is slipping clockwise (towards the left), thus friction will act towards the right. This time the ball's rotational speed decreases while its translational speed increases.
 

Related to How Does Friction Affect the Rolling Motion of a Sphere?

1. What is rolling motion of a sphere?

Rolling motion of a sphere is the movement of a sphere along a surface while also rotating around its own axis. It is a combination of translational and rotational motion.

2. What factors affect the rolling motion of a sphere?

The rolling motion of a sphere is affected by its mass, shape, surface material, and the surface it is rolling on. Friction and air resistance also play a role in the motion.

3. How is the velocity of a rolling sphere calculated?

The velocity of a rolling sphere can be calculated using the equation v = ωr, where v is the linear velocity, ω is the angular velocity, and r is the radius of the sphere.

4. What is the difference between rolling motion and sliding motion?

In rolling motion, the sphere maintains contact with the surface it is rolling on, while in sliding motion, the sphere loses contact with the surface. Rolling motion is also more energy efficient as less friction is involved.

5. Can a sphere roll without slipping?

Yes, a sphere can roll without slipping if the force of friction is enough to provide the required torque for the sphere to rotate. This is known as pure rolling motion.

Similar threads

Back
Top