How Does g(x) = f(x-c) Affect the Domain of the Functions?

  • Thread starter H2Pendragon
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Continuity
In summary, the domain of g is the set D, and the graph of g is relative to the graph of f. The first part of the iff statement is easy to prove, and it's just a matter of showing that |f(x) - f(a)| < Epsilon. The second part is more complicated, but I think you can use what you know about f being continuous at a to get there.
  • #1
H2Pendragon
17
0
Suppose [tex]f:D\rightarrow \Re, c \in \Re[/tex] and g(x) = f(x-c)

1) What's the Domain of g?

I think it's [tex]\Re[/tex], am I right?



2) Suppose that f is continuous at [tex]a \in D \Leftrightarrow[/tex] g is continuous at c + a

So far I have this:
([tex]\Rightarrow[/tex]) Assume f is continuous. Then:
[tex]\forall \epsilon[/tex] > 0 [tex]\exists \delta[/tex] > 0 such that [tex]x \in D, 0 < |x-a| < \delta \Rightarrow |f(x) - f(a)| < \epsilon[/tex].
Let g(x) = f(x-c).

We must prove that [tex]\forall \epsilon'[/tex] > 0 [tex]\exists \delta'[/tex] > 0 such that [tex]x \in D, 0 < |x-c-a| < \delta' \Rightarrow |f(x-c) - f(a-c)| < \epsilon'[/tex]


I see the obvious outcome here because we'll have |x - (c + a)| < [tex]\delta'[/tex], but I'm confused on how to prove the rest of it so that it solves the first part of the iff statement.

The way I've structured it, I'm pretty sure the ([tex]\Leftarrow[/tex]) half with come naturally if I can figure out why this other part works.

Can anyone steer me towards the right wording?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
H2Pendragon said:
Suppose [tex]f:D\rightarrow \Re, c \in \Re[/tex] and g(x) = f(x-c)

1) What's the Domain of g?

I think it's [tex]\Re[/tex], am I right?
No. The domain of f is some set D. What does the graph of g look like relative to the graph of f?
H2Pendragon said:
2) Suppose that f is continuous at a[tex]\in[/tex]D [tex]\Leftrightarrow[/tex] g is continuous at c + a

So far I have this:
([tex]\Rightarrow[/tex]) Assume f is continuous.
I think the line immediately above should be: Assume f is continuous at a, where a is in D.
H2Pendragon said:
Then:
[tex]\forall[/tex][tex]\epsilon[/tex] > 0 [tex]\exists[/tex][tex]\delta[/tex] > 0 such that x[tex]\in[/tex]D and 0 < |x-a| < [tex]\delta[/tex] [tex]\Rightarrow[/tex] |f(x) - f(a)| < [tex]\epsilon[/tex].
Let g(x) = f(x-c).

We must prove that [tex]\forall\epsilon' > 0 \exists\delta[/tex]' > 0 such that x[tex]\in[/tex]D and 0 < |x-c-a| < [tex]\delta' \Rightarrow |f(x-c) - f(a-c)| < \epsilon'[/tex]
For the stuff above, your LaTeX stuff is somewhat garbled up, and it's difficult to decipher what you're trying to say. I would advise putting one whole statement within a pair of <tex> tags. The last part above should say:
[tex]x\in D and 0 < |x-c-a| < \delta' \Rightarrow |g(x) - g(a+c)| < \epsilon'[/tex]

You will also need to clear up your confusion about the domains of f and g, which are different.

In the inequality above, with g(x) and g(a+c), use the relationship between f and g. You're given that g(x) = f(x - c), or equivalently, f(x) = g(x + c).
H2Pendragon said:
I see the obvious outcome here because we'll have |x - (c + a)| < [tex]\delta[/tex]', but I'm confused on how to prove the rest of it so that it solves the first part of the iff statement.

The way I've structured it, I'm pretty sure the ([tex]\Leftarrow[/tex]) half with come naturally if I can figure out why this other part works.

Can anyone steer me towards the right wording?
 
  • #3
I think you came in while I was fixing the <tex> stuff actually.

Exactly how do you know that f(x) = g(x+c)? I don't remember a lot of my early calculus tricks. And why would that help?
 
  • #4
substitution
let u = x-c then x = u-c

g(x) = f(x-c) so
g(u+c) = f(u)

can just re-write this with x's, but may need to be a tiny bit careful which domain each variable comes from
 
  • #5
Well, you know that g(x) = f(x - c), right? So if x = 3 and c = 1, for example, and assuming that 3 - 1 (= 2) is in D, then g(3) = f(3 - 1) = f(2).

In my example, an input to g is 1 larger than an input to f.

It works the same way with your problem. The input to g is c larger than the input to f, so g(x + c) = f(x), as long as all the numbers are in the domain for each function.

Another way to think about it is that the graph of g is the translation to the right (assuming c > 0) by c units of the graph of f. Alternatively, the graph of f is the translation to the left by c units of the graph of g.

You need to show that g is continuous at a + c, so you need to show that |g(x) - g(a + c)| < epsilon'. You need to use what you know about f being continuous at a, and the relationship above is how you can do that.
 
  • #6
A guy on the math forums wrote out the solution for me and it's obviously simple now that I see it:

[tex]\left| {x - a} \right| < \delta \, \Rightarrow \,\left| {\left( {x + c} \right) - \left( {a + c} \right)} \right| < \delta \, \Rightarrow \left| {f(x + c) - f(a + c)} \right|\, < \varepsilon \Rightarrow \,\,\left| {g(x) - g(a)} \right| < \varepsilon [/tex]

but I would of had to have remembered the calculus trick so thank you for jogging that portion of my memoryI'm still confused why the domain of g isn't R if g(x) = f(x -c). Shouldn't that c cause g to be in R?
 
  • #7
but the domain of f is D, which is a subset of [tex] \Re[/tex], but f is not defined outside this domain

with
g(u+c) = f(u)
the domain of g will be all u+c with [tex]u \in D[/tex]

so the domain of g is a subset of [tex] \Re[/tex], but n t [tex] \Re[/tex], it is essentially D shifted by an constant amount c.
 

FAQ: How Does g(x) = f(x-c) Affect the Domain of the Functions?

What is the meaning of "Continuity if g(x) = f(x-c)"?

Continuity refers to the smoothness and connectedness of a function. In this case, "g(x) = f(x-c)" means that the function g(x) is equal to the function f(x) with a horizontal shift of c units. This shift does not affect the continuity of the function.

How does a horizontal shift affect continuity?

A horizontal shift does not affect the continuity of a function. As long as the function remains unchanged in terms of its shape and value, it will remain continuous. In the case of "g(x) = f(x-c)", the function f(x) and g(x) are equivalent and therefore have the same continuity.

Can a function be continuous if there is a horizontal shift?

Yes, a function can be continuous even with a horizontal shift. As long as the shift does not change the underlying shape and value of the function, it will remain continuous. In the case of "g(x) = f(x-c)", the continuity of the function is maintained since the shift does not alter the function itself.

How does the value of c affect the continuity of the function?

The value of c does not directly affect the continuity of the function. The function will remain continuous as long as the shift does not change the underlying shape and value of the function. However, if c is a large value, it could potentially cause a discontinuity in the function if it shifts the function in a way that creates a hole or a jump in the graph.

Can a function be discontinuous even if there is no horizontal shift?

Yes, a function can be discontinuous even without a horizontal shift. Discontinuity can occur due to various reasons such as a hole in the graph, a jump in the graph, or an asymptote. The presence or absence of a horizontal shift does not determine the continuity of the function.

Similar threads

Back
Top