- #1
fliptomato
- 78
- 0
Greetings--this is from Ryden's Introduction to Cosmology, question # 5.2. Let me restate the question:
Here w is the equation of state parameter for whatever the universe is made of (e.g. w = 0 for matter, 1/3 for radiation).
Here is my best attempt so far:
Simplify notation by introducing [tex]y=\frac{2}{3(1+w)}[/tex]
Then (eq. 5.51 in Ryder):
[tex]1+z = \left(\frac{t_0}{t_e}\right)^y[/tex]
Where [tex]t_e[/tex] is the time at which the light was emitted.
Also (eq. 5.48 in Ryder):
[tex]t_0 = \frac{y}{H_0}[/tex]
So differentiating the first equation w/rt [tex]t_0[/tex], we get:
[tex]\frac{dz}{dt_0} = yt_0^{y-1}t_e^{-y} - y t_e^{-y-1}t_0^y \frac{dt_e}{t0}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{dz}{dt_0} = H_0(1+z) - y t_e^{-1} (1+z) \frac{dt_e}{t0}[/tex]
But [tex]\frac{dt_e}{t0} = (1+z)^{-1/y}[/tex] from our equation (5.51) above. Equation (5.52) in Ryder also tell us:
[tex]t_e = \frac{y}{H_0}(1+z)^{-1/y}[/tex]
So plugging these two in:
[tex]\frac{dz}{dt_0} = H_0(1+z) - y\left(\frac{H_0}{y}(1+z)^{1/y}\right)(1+z)(1+z)^{-1/y}[/tex]
Which becomes identically zero! Where am I making my mistake?
Thanks,
Flip
A light source in a flat, single-component universe has a redshift z when observed at a time [tex]t_0[/tex]. Show that the observed redshift changes at a rate
[tex]\frac{dz}{dt_0} = H_0(1+z) - H_0(1+z)^{\frac{3(1+w)}{2}}[/tex]
Here w is the equation of state parameter for whatever the universe is made of (e.g. w = 0 for matter, 1/3 for radiation).
Here is my best attempt so far:
Simplify notation by introducing [tex]y=\frac{2}{3(1+w)}[/tex]
Then (eq. 5.51 in Ryder):
[tex]1+z = \left(\frac{t_0}{t_e}\right)^y[/tex]
Where [tex]t_e[/tex] is the time at which the light was emitted.
Also (eq. 5.48 in Ryder):
[tex]t_0 = \frac{y}{H_0}[/tex]
So differentiating the first equation w/rt [tex]t_0[/tex], we get:
[tex]\frac{dz}{dt_0} = yt_0^{y-1}t_e^{-y} - y t_e^{-y-1}t_0^y \frac{dt_e}{t0}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{dz}{dt_0} = H_0(1+z) - y t_e^{-1} (1+z) \frac{dt_e}{t0}[/tex]
But [tex]\frac{dt_e}{t0} = (1+z)^{-1/y}[/tex] from our equation (5.51) above. Equation (5.52) in Ryder also tell us:
[tex]t_e = \frac{y}{H_0}(1+z)^{-1/y}[/tex]
So plugging these two in:
[tex]\frac{dz}{dt_0} = H_0(1+z) - y\left(\frac{H_0}{y}(1+z)^{1/y}\right)(1+z)(1+z)^{-1/y}[/tex]
Which becomes identically zero! Where am I making my mistake?
Thanks,
Flip