How Does Substantial Change View Analyze New Compound Properties?

  • Thread starter Kristophoros
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Science
In summary, the conversation discusses two different views of chemical change and the existence of emergent properties in compounds. The standard mechanistic view sees chemical change as accidental and the new compound as having emergent properties not present in its parts or reactants. On the other hand, the substantial change view examines the new properties of the compound without taking them as emergent. The main difference between the two views is their perspective on the existence of emergent properties.Additionally, the conversation touches on the metaphysical analysis of organisms as substances and the role of parts and physical activities within them. The internal structure of an organism is described as a combination of quantity and genes. This suggests that the quantity and genes of an organism play a significant role in its structure
  • #1
Kristophoros
1
0
1.) On a standard mechanistic view of chemical change as accidental change involving ordered aggregates, the new compund is sometimes taken to have emergent properties not present in the parts of the compound or in the chemical reactants that formed the compound. HOW WOULD SOMEONE WHO ACCEPTS CHEMICAL CHANGE AS SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE ANALYZE THE NEW PROPERTIES OF THE NEW COMPUND WITHOUT TAKING THEM AS EMERGENT PROPERTIES? WHAT IS THE MAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO VIEWS RELEVANT TO THE EXISTENCE OF EMERGENT PROPERTIES?
2.) ASSUMING THAT ORGANISMS ARE SUBSTANCES, PROVIDE A METAPHYSICAL ANALYSIS OF THE NATURE OF PARTS AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES IN ORGANISMS. ALSO, DESCRIBE THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF AN ORGANISM AND RELATE IT TO THE QUANTITY ON THE ONE HAND AND GENES ON THE OTHER HAND.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This sounds like a school assignment. Please share with us your thoughts on how these questions could be answered.
 
  • #3


1.) Someone who accepts chemical change as substantial change would analyze the new properties of the compound by looking at the underlying substances and their interactions. They would not view the new properties as emergent, but rather as a result of the combination and rearrangement of the substances involved. The main difference between the two views is their understanding of causation. The mechanistic view sees the new properties as emerging from the interactions of the parts, while the substantial change view sees the properties as inherent in the substances themselves.

2.) Assuming organisms are substances, a metaphysical analysis of the nature of parts and physical activities in organisms would view them as essential to the existence and functioning of the organism. Parts would be seen as necessary components that contribute to the overall structure and function of the organism. Physical activities, such as metabolism and reproduction, would be seen as essential processes that maintain the organism's existence.

The internal structure of an organism can be described as a complex system of interconnected parts, each with their own specific functions. This structure is essential for the organism to carry out its physical activities and maintain its existence. The quantity of an organism's parts is important as it determines the overall size and complexity of the organism. However, the genes within the organism also play a crucial role in determining its structure and function. Genes contain the instructions for the development and functioning of the organism, and thus have a significant impact on its internal structure. The interaction between quantity and genes is important in understanding the complexity and diversity of organisms in the natural world.
 

FAQ: How Does Substantial Change View Analyze New Compound Properties?

What is substance in modern science?

Substance in modern science refers to the fundamental building blocks of matter that make up the physical world around us. It is defined as a type of matter that has a constant composition and distinct properties, and cannot be separated into other substances by physical means.

How is substance studied in modern science?

Substance is studied in modern science through various fields such as chemistry, physics, and biology. These fields use experimental and theoretical methods to analyze and understand the properties, behavior, and interactions of different substances. Advanced technologies and techniques, such as spectroscopy and microscopy, are also used to study substances on a molecular level.

What is the relationship between substance and energy in modern science?

In modern science, substance and energy are closely related and often interchangeable concepts. Energy is needed to create and maintain the structure of substances, while substances can also store and release energy. The study of the relationship between substance and energy is important in fields such as thermodynamics and biochemistry.

What role does substance play in the development of modern technology?

Substance plays a crucial role in the development of modern technology. Different substances are used to create a wide range of materials and products, from basic tools to advanced electronics. The understanding and manipulation of substances has also led to the development of new technologies, such as nanotechnology, which have a significant impact on various industries and our daily lives.

How does modern science view the concept of substance?

Modern science views substance as a dynamic and evolving concept. With advancements in technology and scientific research, our understanding of substances continues to evolve, leading to new discoveries and applications. Additionally, the concept of substance is often integrated with other scientific principles, such as energy and quantum mechanics, to further our understanding of the physical world.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
40
Views
7K
Back
Top