How does synthetic division produce the results it does?

  • Thread starter Eclair_de_XII
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Division
In summary, synthetic division is a simplified method of polynomial division that allows for quickly finding the remainder of a polynomial when divided by a linear factor. This is useful in finding the output of a function, such as in the case of finding f(-2) for the function f(x) = x^3.
  • #1
Eclair_de_XII
1,083
91

Homework Statement


f(x) = x^3
Find f(-2)
f(-2) = -8
The text says that by dividing a function [x^3] by [x minus a given input (-2)] using synthetic division, I'll be able to produce the correct output (-8). I want to know why this happens.

Homework Equations


(x^3)/(x-(-2)) = -8

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm trying to prove that x^3 divided by x minus the input will produce the output. I made it simple enough, but all I manage to do is prove that synthetic division does what it does.

(x^3)/(x+2) = -8 [multiply both sides by (x+2)]
x^3 = -8x - 16 [move right side to left]
x^3 + 8x + 16 [divide whole equation by (x+2)]
(x^3 + 8x + 16)/(x+2) [synthetic division]

-2 1 0 8 16
-2 4 -24
1 -2 4 -8

I still don't know why synthetic division produces an output for a given input when subtracted from x, and becomes the divisor for the original equation. It still ends up with me having to use synthetic division to obtain my result.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Eclair_de_XII said:

Homework Statement


f(x) = x^3
Find f(-2)
f(-2) = -8
The text says that by dividing a function [x^3] by [x minus a given input (-2)] using synthetic division, I'll be able to produce the correct output (-8). I want to know why this happens.

Homework Equations


(x^3)/(x-(-2)) = -8

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm trying to prove that x^3 divided by x minus the input will produce the output. I made it simple enough, but all I manage to do is prove that synthetic division does what it does.

(x^3)/(x+2) = -8 [multiply both sides by (x+2)]
x^3 = -8x - 16 [move right side to left]
x^3 + 8x + 16 [divide whole equation by (x+2)]
(x^3 + 8x + 16)/(x+2) [synthetic division]

-2 1 0 8 16
-2 4 -24
1 -2 4 -8

I still don't know why synthetic division produces an output for a given input when subtracted from x, and becomes the divisor for the original equation. It still ends up with me having to use synthetic division to obtain my result.

For any polynomial ##p(x)##, ##p(a)## is the remainder when ##p(x)## is divided by ##(x-a)##. The reason is simple: division produces a lower-degree polynomial ##q(x)## such that for all ##x## we have
[tex] p(x) = (x-a) q(x) + r[/tex]
The remainder ##r## has lower degree than the divisor ##x-a## (which is already of degree 1); thus, the remainder is just a number and does not conain ##x## at all---that is, it is a constant. Since the equation holds for all ##x##, just look at what it gives you when you set ##x = a##.
 
  • Like
Likes RUber
  • #3
Synthetic division is simply "division" with non-necessary parts dropped. For example, to divide [itex]x^3- 5x^2+ 7x- 2[/itex] by x- 2, I would, as a "trial divisor" note that x will divide into [itex]x^3[/itex] [itex]x^2[/itex] times. Multiplying x- 2 by [itex]x^2[/itex] gives [itex]x^3- 2x^2[/itex]. Subtracting that from [itex]x^3- 5x^2+ 7x- 2[/itex] leaves a remainder of [itex]-3x^2+ 7x- 2[/itex]. x will divide into [itex]-3x^2[/itex] [itex]-3x[/itex] times. Multiplying x- 2 by [itex]-3x[/itex] gives [itex]-3x^2+ 6x[/itex]. Subtracting that from [itex]-3x^2+ 7x- 2[/itex] leaves [itex]x- 2[/itex] and x- 2 obviously divides into that exactly once. [itex]x- 2[/itex] divides into [itex]x^3- 5x^2+ 7x- 2[/itex] exactly [itex]x^2- 3x+ 1[/itex] times.

Now, for synthetic division, since the powers of x are always in the same order, we don't really need to write those- write the dividend as [itex]\begin{array}{cccc}1 & -5 & 7 & -2\end{array}[/itex]. And we can change those subtractions into additions by changing the sign- instead of "x- 2" we just write the divisor as "2". We have [itex]\begin{array} {cccccc} & || 1 & -5 & 7 & -2\end{array}[/itex]. Bring down that first 1: and multiply the 2 by that: [tex]\begin{array} {cccccc}2 & || & 1 & -5 & 7 & -2 \\ & & 2 & & & \\ & & 1 & -3 & & \end{array}[/tex]. 2 times that -3 is -6 we would next have [tex]\begin{array} {cccccc}2 & || & 1 & -5 & 7 & -2 \\ & & & 2 & -6 & \\ & & 1 & -3 & 1 & \end{array}[/tex]. And 2 times that 1 is 2 so [tex]\begin{array} {cccccc}2 & || & 1 & -5 & 7 & -2 \\ & & & 2 & -6 & 2\\ & & 1 & -3 & 1 & 0 \end{array}[/tex]. That bottom row, "[itex]\begin{array}{cccc}1 & -3 & 1 & 0 \end{array}[/itex]" we interpret as [itex]x^2- 3x+ 1[/itex].
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
Ray Vickson said:
The reason is simple: division produces a lower-degree polynomial q(x)q(x) such that for all xx we have
p(x)=(xa)q(x)+r
p(x) = (x-a) q(x) + r
The remainder rr has lower degree than the divisor xax-a (which is already of degree 1);

I'm sorry; I don't quite understand what you mean by 'lower-degree'. Do you mean like exponents?
 
  • #5
Eclair_de_XII said:
I'm sorry; I don't quite understand what you mean by 'lower-degree'. Do you mean like exponents?
Yes. For example the degree of x3 - 2x + 1 is 3, which is the degree of the x3 term.
 
  • #6
So what you're saying is: if a coefficient in a polynomial equation possesses a degree of 0 (that is, x to the power of zero), it is a number all its own; given that anything to the power of zero is one, and anything multiplied by one will not change?

Ray Vickson said:
For any polynomial p(x)p(x), p(a)p(a) is the remainder when p(x)p(x) is divided by (xa)(x-a). The reason is simple: division produces a lower-degree polynomial q(x)q(x) such that for all xx we have
p(x)=(xa)q(x)+r

So is this a basic law, or something?
 
  • #7
Eclair_de_XII said:
So what you're saying is: if a coefficient in a polynomial equation possesses a degree of 0 (that is, x to the power of zero), it is a number all its own; given that anything to the power of zero is one, and anything multiplied by one will not change?
So is this a basic law, or something?

No. It is the definition of what is meant by "division".

It involves a bit of work to show that the operation of division actually exists (i.e, has "meaning") and produces unique results. You can find out more using Google to search the internet for material on 'division of polynomials'.
 
  • #8
Ray Vickson said:
It involves a bit of work to show that the operation of division actually exists (i.e, has "meaning") and produces unique results. You can find out more using Google to search the internet for material on 'division of polynomials'.

I might research the former if I have spare time. Thanks for all of your help, guys.
 

FAQ: How does synthetic division produce the results it does?

How does synthetic division work?

Synthetic division is a method used to divide a polynomial by a linear polynomial. It involves setting up a table and using the coefficients of the polynomials to perform a series of calculations, resulting in a quotient and a remainder.

Why is synthetic division used?

Synthetic division is often used because it is a faster and easier method compared to long division when dividing by a linear polynomial. It is also useful for finding factors and roots of polynomials.

How is synthetic division related to the Remainder Theorem?

The Remainder Theorem states that when a polynomial f(x) is divided by x - c, the remainder will be f(c). Synthetic division uses this concept by substituting the value of c into the polynomial and performing the calculations to get the remainder.

Can synthetic division be used for any type of polynomial?

No, synthetic division is only used for dividing by a linear polynomial, meaning a polynomial with only one variable raised to the first power. It cannot be used for polynomials with multiple variables or higher powers.

What are the benefits of using synthetic division?

Some benefits of synthetic division include its speed and simplicity compared to long division, and its usefulness in finding factors and roots of polynomials. It can also be used to solve equations and graph polynomials.

Similar threads

Back
Top