How Does the Shape of the Milky Way's Dark Halo Influence the 511 keV Line?

In summary, the authors of this study compared theoretical expectations of the galactic positron distribution within the Light Dark Matter (LDM) scenario to observational data from INTEGRAL/SPI. They found that the best fit to the observed 511 keV emission is provided by a radial density profile with an inner logarithmic slope of gamma=1.03+-0.04, which suggests that the LDM candidate should be a scalar rather than a spin-1/2 particle. This also leads to a very stringent constraint on the value of the positron production cross-section and could potentially impact our understanding of the fine structure constant. Further research on the shape of the dark halo profile could provide valuable insights into the origin of the 511 ke
  • #1
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
4,446
558
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0507142

Title: Constraints on dark matter and the shape of the Milky Way dark halo from the 511 keV line
Authors: Y. Ascasibar (1), P. Jean (2), C. Boehm (3,4), J. Knoedlseder (2) ((1) Harvard-Smithsonian CfA, USA, (2) Centre d'Etude Spatiale des Rayonnements, France, (3) LAPTH UMR-5108, France, (4) CERN, Switzerland)
Comments: 11 pages, 4 figures, submitted to MNRAS

About one year ago, it was speculated that decaying or annihilating Light Dark Matter (LDM) particles could explain the flux and extension of the 511 keV line emission in the galactic centre. Here we present a thorough comparison between theoretical expectations of the galactic positron distribution within the LDM scenario and observational data from INTEGRAL/SPI. Unlike previous analyses, there is now enough statistical evidence to put tight constraints on the shape of the dark matter halo of our galaxy, if the galactic positrons originate from dark matter. For annihilating candidates, the best fit to the observed 511 keV emission is provided by a radial density profile with inner logarithmic slope gamma=1.03+-0.04. In contrast, decaying dark matter requires a much steeper density profile, gamma>1.5, rather disfavoured by both observations and numerical simulations. Within the annihilating LDM scenario, a velocity-independent cross-section would be consistent with the observational data while a cross-section purely proportional to v^2 can be rejected at a high confidence level. Assuming the most simplistic model where the galactic positrons are produced as primaries, we show that the LDM candidate should be a scalar rather than a spin-1/2 particle and obtain a very stringent constraint on the value of the positron production cross-section to explain the 511 keV emission. One consequence is that the value of the fine structure constant should differ from that recommended in the CODATA. This is a very strong test for the LDM scenario and an additional motivation in favour of experiments measuring alpha directly. Our results finally indicate that an accurate measurement of the shape of the dark halo profile could have a tremendous impact on the determination of the origin of the 511 keV line and vice versa.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
When I see scalar I'm reading Higgs. But, a change in the fine structure constant looks pretty close to a falsification to me. I'm confident that CODATA has that one right to an absurdly high level of precision.
 

Related to How Does the Shape of the Milky Way's Dark Halo Influence the 511 keV Line?

1. What is dark matter?

Dark matter is a type of matter that is thought to make up about 85% of the total matter in the universe. It does not interact with light, making it invisible to telescopes and other instruments. Its presence can only be inferred through its gravitational effects on visible matter.

2. What are the constraints on dark matter?

The constraints on dark matter refer to the limitations and boundaries within which scientists can study and understand this elusive substance. These constraints include the inability to directly observe dark matter, as well as the difficulty in determining its composition and properties.

3. How do scientists study dark matter?

Scientists use a variety of methods to study dark matter, including observations of its gravitational effects on visible matter, simulations of the evolution of the universe, and experiments using particle accelerators to try and detect dark matter particles.

4. What are the current theories about dark matter?

There are several theories about the nature of dark matter, but the most widely accepted one is the Cold Dark Matter (CDM) model. This theory proposes that dark matter is made up of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) that were produced in the early universe.

5. Why is understanding dark matter important?

Understanding dark matter is crucial to our understanding of the universe and its evolution. It plays a key role in the formation and structure of galaxies and galaxy clusters, and helps to explain the large-scale structure of the universe. Additionally, studying dark matter could also lead to new discoveries and advancements in physics and cosmology.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
29
Views
7K
Back
Top