How Feasible Is It? Changing English major to Physics major

[ZapperZ]

I really decided a while back to no longer participate in here, especially when you've expressed how little you value the responses you've gotten. I tend to stop caring when some is being ungrateful to the effort I've put in in trying to help. However, there is a clear lack of understanding of what was being conveyed here.

I can't speak for the motives of other responders in this thread. In MY case, what I had written on this thread was NEVER meant to stop or discourage you from doing whatever it is that you wanted to do. Rather, what I tried to do, and it is something that I've consistently tried to do when question like this comes up (and you are NOT the first to ask such a question), is to convey what I've written here:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=4603496&postcount=24

You also need to examined what it was that you were expecting to get when you ASKED your question on here. Were you expecting affirmation of what you wish to do? Or were you really sincere in finding out opinions on your plan?

In any case, I'm done. You're welcome to take the advice that I've given, or ignore them. And if we're playing the "age" card here, I'm about 10 days away from turning 52, and I've been either studying physics, or working in physics, ever since I was 18. I've seen enough students passing through to know quite a bit more of the reality of being a physicist and the challenges in pursuing such a career.

Zz.

 

[B4ssHunter]

I don't have a degree right now. I work and take care of my family as well as go to school. Is it hard? Of course. As I stated already, I'm ready for the challenge. I've seen women work three jobs, bud, just to get by. I've seen kids in other countries starve, and still work. I've seen perseverance in the worst scenarios. Then I think about my life and how blessed I am to live where I live and have the option to go to school. Unfortunately, this word "hard" is relative, and many kids in America (we rank 23 in the whole world, which isn't good) pretend like our education is so hard. No, it's not that it's so hard it's that we're just so used to easy things and we don't want to spend enough time doing our homework because we're so bogged down with video games and movies; media entertainment and non-sense. Rubbish.

I really don't feel like debating my career anymore. I made my decision.

dont just turn off your mind , nobody is trying to knock you off your choice , people here are trying to help you realize what your choice really is , in the end you are the one who's going to live it , the difficulty is not in studying , if you love physics you will love studying , its in the employment , that's it .
anyway if its really worth it , try to go through the job you're doing and the education you will be getting in parallel , do not waste one for the sake of the other , who knows maybe you will need that teacher job in the end , or maybe not , so always be ready

 

[WannabeNewton]

Unfortunately, this word "hard" is relative, and many kids in America (we rank 23 in the whole world, which isn't good) pretend like our education is so hard. No, it's not that it's so hard it's that we're just so used to easy things and we don't want to spend enough time doing our homework because we're so bogged down with video games and movies; media entertainment and non-sense. Rubbish.

Boy is reality going to hit you square in the face if you decide to study physics. Nobody "pretends" that physics is hard; it's just hard period. Seriously what do you think physics is?

Well good luck regardless.

 

[ZapperZ]

Ah, I found it!

I said that I wasn't going to continue in this thread, but I was wrecking my brain in trying to find where exactly I had read something similar, and I found it.

I am referring to this post by the OP:

Bander, I appreciate your input. And no apology necessary, you're quite right.

There are variables here that this community doesn't know about, that would, otherwise known, reveal their error and misperception about me. What I've accumulated over the years is experience in the real world, and hard cold facts of life. I see students who have everything handed to them, then study limited amounts of time and go back to their video games. I'm not this guy. I realize my age plays an imperative role in my future, but this notion that because I'm 34 I'm somehow ineffective is ridiculous at it's very best. I don't know how many professors and students say things like "go after what you truly have a passion for, and don't listen to those that will try and bring you down. If you do something you love, you'll never work a day in your life". Yet, somehow, here everything is a black hole of disappointment. Not sure if the many years of math did this or just the disappointment in the job market. Either way, it's a horrible mentality to have. I'm a realist, and I agree with being honest, but I refuse to settle for being a pessimist.

It is uncanny closed to what has been said before in this Science Career article that I posted here:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=4487035&postcount=186

There's A LOT to be learned from that Science article. Like I said elsewhere, we can only lead a horse to water...

Zz.

 

[solisspirit]

ZapperZ, I don't think you said anything too negative, but as a collective source of feedback, all I got was a pessimist view and a condescending attitude that was clearly not necessary. This was clear by Student110's comment calling another poster out on it, so it's not like I'm making this more than it is.

Like I said, I made my decision. I believe in going after what it is you want to do. It's actually quite an interesting story, because for so long everyone kept telling me going into a teaching degree with English was a dumb move, because there'd be no jobs and the pay is awful. I defended my degree then many times, and I still do. But now that I'm aiming for something more, and doing precisely what everyone told me to do, I get these results. It never ceases to amaze.

 

[joneiljack]

OP, after reading through every post here I can just say most of the people here were just trying to make you understand what you're up against.

- They challenged your reasoning behind your current ideas and expressed what problems you will most likely bump into (from their experience in their field).
- From their experience they gave you what they consider a realistic approach on how to go about doing it. (i.e. get some books first, see if you like doing it)

Now, given the tone, it can be easily interpreted as negative or pessimistic, but they never said "don't do it." They were simply telling you the difficulties you might encounter. In the end of course the choice is yours.

So instead of taking all the aspects of the replies which you might find "negative" or "pessimistic" I think a better and a more productive way is to just keep them in the back of your mind and use them to prepare yourself for what you might be facing. Because I assure you that their intention wasn't to put you down. (It would be quite the conspiracy that ~35 posts or so were dead set on putting you down). Ignore the tone, consider the issues they brought forth and think how you'd handle them if they are correct. You may or may not face them, obviously. (i.e. "if physics will be harder than I think it is, maybe I could take it slow, reduce some courses if need be")

To repeat myself: They just told you what they think about the difficulties you might encounter.

So of course you can follow your dreams! But being cautious about it is very important.

And nonetheless, good luck OP!

 

[nri]

Don't do this to yourself.

You'll spend 10 years in school studying Physics only to get a job that's not related in it. It's not worth it - no matter if you are in your 20s or 30s.

It's not matter of hard work. No matter how hard you work, if there are no jobs, you won't get one. In my field after 10 years of hard work you are a real deal, a professional who works in interesting projects and can earn money and when you are 40, you work as creative director for biggest companies doing coolest stuff. In physics after 10 years of schooling and 10 years of post-docking you don't have permanent job and make coffe as assistant professor. Forget about interesting projects. It's kinda pathetic.

You should go for engineering. It's the only way for you to work in sth related to physics.

 

[AlephZero]

but as a collective source of feedback, all I got was a pessimist view and a condescending attitude that was clearly not necessary.

Never forget Scott Adams' (the Dilbert cartoonist) definition: an optimist is a pessimist with no real world experience.

As for previous comments on physics and engineering, blaming everything on bean counters in HR is a nice way to sidestep the issue, but the reason my employers don't hire a physicist when they want an engineer is simple: we have had our fingers burned too many times before when we tried it. It's not just a matter of what they know - either should be smart enough to learn fast on the job. It's the different ways they have been taught to think. To caricature the situation, given something that doesn't work, a physicist wants to set up a research project to explore why it doesn't work, publish some papers about it, and get then funding to do some more research. An engineer just wants to fix it, and move on to the next job

 

[solisspirit]

Never forget Scott Adams' (the Dilbert cartoonist) definition: an optimist is a pessimist with no real world experience.

The issue here is Adams is a cartoon author. More importantly, however, I claimed to be a realist; the one that weighs the scale evenly with a combination of common sense and intelligibility. I would say this is the fair approach.

nri, I appreciate your approach. You're not only honest but claim to come from actual experience. At any rate, I suspect there are variables here that either you guys, being engineers don't get to experience or see, that physicist do. I did a little research the last few days on physics jobs, including statistics as well as the local job market for them, and not only are there jobs available with the requirements being interchanged between a degree in math, physics, or engineering, but there are also jobs for people with just a B.A. in physics.

I also found a video that I've not completely finished watching as it's nearly an hour long, but watched enough to see that the statistics from official and reputable research groups show the jobs are there and that physicist degree holders go on to hold jobs for computer engineering, as well as various other things. So, what I think is happening here is maybe some of you are not up to date on current statistics and the job market. In my local area, I could go apply for a physics job tomorrow, as they are looking for these degrees. There are many engineers and I think with a degree in physics I'll be able to stand out.

 

[ModusPwnd]

I did a little research the last few days on physics jobs, including statistics as well as the local job market for them, and not only are there jobs available with the requirements being interchanged between a degree in math, physics, or engineering, but there are also jobs for people with just a B.A. in physics.

...

So, what I think is happening here is maybe some of you are not up to date on current statistics and the job market. In my local area, I could go apply for a physics job tomorrow, as they are looking for these degrees. There are many engineers and I think with a degree in physics I'll be able to stand out.

I would love to know specifically what companies or places you are talking about. I've been looking for a tech job with my two physics degrees for over two years now. I've never even been able to get an interview. I am not a genius nor am I a PhD, but I don't consider myself a complete slouch. I graduated with honors, got As in all but one physics class, I did research as a grad and undergrad, attended conferences, etc. I apply to positions ranging from Master's required/PhD preferred to only some college necessary. Here is one I applied to last month,

https://microchip.tms.hrdepartment....t-Engineering-Tech-I-ImplantUS-Gresham-Oregon

I think that I could excel at that job and I think that my resume speaks to this. But I never even got a call, and the job is still listed...

After two years of never even getting a call back, I have to do something different or I will never get a technical job. I'm now taking classes again working towards a BS in electrical engineering.

This is just my experience, but I do not think its that out of the ordinary. Keeping in touch with my classmates from undergrad and grad school, those without PhDs have a hard time getting any tech job at all. Some are doing things unrelated like IT or school teacher, many are doing things completely unrelated like truck driver and restaurant worker.

 

[solisspirit]

Here is one example in my area. Notice the major is interchangeable and doesn't matter whether you have an engineering degree, math degree, or physics degree.

https://ngc.taleo.net/careersection/ngc_pro/jobdetail.ftl?job=401131&src=JB-10200

Also, I've have heard before that when you have an advanced degree this is disqualify you for many jobs due to you being "over-qualified". I think general supervisors don't like someone higher than them working under them, because they can feel inferior to their own job. I don't plan on getting anything higher than a bachelor's until I set myself in a job firmly. Then I will pursue my masters.

 

[WannabeFeynman]

Will you be able to support your family financially while studying for 4 years, at the very least?

 

[ModusPwnd]

Here is one example in my area. Notice the major is interchangeable and doesn't matter whether you have an engineering degree, math degree, or physics degree.

https://ngc.taleo.net/careersection/ngc_pro/jobdetail.ftl?job=401131&src=JB-10200

Also, I've have heard before that when you have an advanced degree this is disqualify you for many jobs due to you being "over-qualified". I think general supervisors don't like someone higher than them working under them, because they can feel inferior to their own job. I don't plan on getting anything higher than a bachelor's until I set myself in a job firmly. Then I will pursue my masters.

Yea, but that is not an entry level position either. It requires 5 years of experience. I'll still apply for it though, thanks for the link.

I have applied to places by listing both my masters and BS, I have also applied with only my BS on my resume with the same thoughts you mentioned here. I have also applied to jobs with no degree on my resume at all, and these are the jobs I actually get interviews for. They are not tech jobs, but working in a restaurant does pay the bills.

 

[heatengine516]

Yes we don't like to be pigeonholed which is what makes a physics degree so enticing. But if you take a look at the typical physics curriculum at most universities(unless it is engineering physics, or you are able to pick up some kind of engineering minor) are there any courses that cover any topics in, say, computer engineering? Typically not.

The typical undergraduate curriculum for physics is classical mechanics, electricity and magnetism, thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, etc. These course cover the most basic, general representation of the theories therein. None of them cover VLSI design or RF or signal processing, or vehicle control systems.

With this in mind, is it logical to assume that someone with a physics degree would be qualified for any positions in engineering such as those that deal with the topics above WITHOUT rigorous on-the-job training IF it is provided (in most postings I've seen, usually not)?

 

[solisspirit]

Will you be able to support your family financially while studying for 4 years, at the very least?

Absolutely. That's what I'm doing now. Furthermore, I won't need four years. I've already managed to acquire 42 credit hours, some of which won't count because they are in a different major program of study, but most of them will.

 

[solisspirit]

Yea, but that is not an entry level position either. It requires 5 years of experience. I'll still apply for it though, thanks for the link.

I have applied to places by listing both my masters and BS, I have also applied with only my BS on my resume with the same thoughts you mentioned here. I have also applied to jobs with no degree on my resume at all, and these are the jobs I actually get interviews for. They are not tech jobs, but working in a restaurant does pay the bills.

You might want to continue searching in my area. Jobs are flowing here.

 

[solisspirit]

Yes we don't like to be pigeonholed which is what makes a physics degree so enticing. But if you take a look at the typical physics curriculum at most universities(unless it is engineering physics, or you are able to pick up some kind of engineering minor) are there any courses that cover any topics in, say, computer engineering? Typically not.

The typical undergraduate curriculum for physics is classical mechanics, electricity and magnetism, thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, etc. These course cover the most basic, general representation of the theories therein. None of them cover VLSI design or RF or signal processing, or vehicle control systems.

With this in mind, is it logical to assume that someone with a physics degree would be qualified for any positions in engineering such as those that deal with the topics above WITHOUT rigorous on-the-job training IF it is provided (in most postings I've seen, usually not)?

From what I can tell, I have the option of choosing computer engineering classes when I get to a particular math. Right now I'm taking CIS 201 (I think, though the number could be off). It's basically the second part of CIS. I'm very interested in the physics engineering courses though. Some colleges are actually offering this, while others are still holding off. I'll check with the university I'll be transferring to and see if the program is offered. If so, I'll probably take that path.

 

[Mépris]

No one is trying to discourage you, but the issue is you're not listening to their advice. You claim to be a realist, but you are adamant in wanting people to validate your idea of the reality.

Look up posts by ParticleGrl and twofish-quant if you want extended accounts on what it's like. Also look up the "So You Want To Be A Physicist?" video on YouTube.

Most physics majors don't go to grad school. Most physics PhDs don't do physics beyond grad school or their post doc. Twofish has argued that his work in finance was a lot like his work in physics, and he seemed to like it.

Before jumping into this, maybe try to learn some calculus or mechanics on your own, or take the classes.

edit: I've just started studying physics myself, but I know I *will* have to get creative if I want a job. I have a few things in mind, and most of them have nothing to do with physics. For e.g, writing self help.

 

[Jilang]

Sincere best wishes and good luck with your career choice. The only thing I can add is to go with your instincts. From what I can gather few people have a good word to say about career advisors.

 

[ParticleGrl]

So I do have a phd in theoretical physics. After my phd from a top school, I spent some time as a bartender while I completely retooled in order to get an insurance job.

Its really important to have a goal for what you want to do AFTER your physics degree, because this will inform what you study. Right now, your vaguely stated goal is to try to become a theoretical physicist- that's fine, but you have to realize what that involves- your electives will be geared toward getting you into grad school (there are no theory jobs for bachelors holders). Instead of taking engineering electives, you'll be taking more math classes and higher level physics electives.

This is going to leave you less qualified (probably unqualified) for engineering jobs, more qualified to do theory research in grad school. If your goal is a job in your current area- you'd be better served looking at the job postings and aiming for the additional skills you need (take more CS, or more chemistry, or more whatever, and less physics). Thats why having a goal to help guide you is important.

Also, you've said you've already taken 40+ credit hours- how many of those were technical courses? If you use your non-technical courses to fill out your degree, you could end up with a very bare-bones physics degree. If all your electives are humanities courses (instead of engineering or more advanced physics), then what sorts of jobs will you chase? Technical writing? Do you already have some technical skills (programming, etc)?

 

[Arsenic&Lace]

I don't understand why you wouldn't pursue some form of applied physics. Sure, it lacks the sex appeal of trying to find a grand unified theory of nature and becoming Einstein the 2nd, but you get to do some awesome stuff and improve your chances of getting paid to do it.

For instance, I'm heavily considering getting a masters or phd in solid state electrical engineering since that seems like the most straightforward jump from where I currently stand and it's still pretty cool stuff even when compared to the quantum field theory I originally thought I'd study. Students at my school who do their PhD's in applied physics seem to get funneled into the local engineering employers.

 

[Arsenic&Lace]

I do have to address an absurd and irritating implicit distortion of reality consistently happening on these threads: engineering majors always get jobs. They don't. Lots of my engineering friends are struggling horribly to get jobs right now. Not all of them granted and the best guys who did internships and made connections in particular have no trouble getting employed.

A friend of mine is a physics major who got an internship at a top engineering employer. He will have zero trouble getting a job there after he graduates, his boss said so! A EEE with no internship experience would have a hard time getting such a job. See a trend? If you pursue physics and only think of an academic career track, you're screwing yourself.

Just getting a degree actually does little for you whether it's in engineering or physics. Academic skills often don't transfer as well as people think. A family member of mine is a well payed engineer, and he claims to use less than 10% of what he learned in college! There are certain engineering jobs which are heavily related to what one learns in academia, but the majority of engineering jobs consist of learning lots of ever evolving skills. All of my physics friends who are in engineering positions (there are several of those!) found themselves to be at worst slightly behind their peers. Those who were good at programming outmatched the EEE people since they don't learn much programming either.

To drive this point further, a friend of mine has less than a 3.0 gpa. He works at a top EEE employer. How did he get there? Purely through connections. Had he cold called them, he wouldn't have gotten past mentioning his GPA since this particular employer has a high cutoff (somewhere around 3.8 or 3.75 or so). I think a lot of people in this thread are missing the point on how this employment thing works.

 

[Student100]

Networking has always been, and always will be, the greatest factor in any job search.

The man wants to study physics, study physics.

 

[ModusPwnd]

Networking is better had in the engineering department. Physics professors often never had an industry job in their life. My undergrad research professor has been in academia his whole life. My grad school research professor worked in industry a few decades back. Almost none of my physics professors ever had a non-university technical job. Every single one of my engineering professors (so far) has.

I think networking is one of the many things that distinguishes engineering as more employable than physics. In engineering departments they often organize internships and most students do them. In the physics department you do research on campus if you are lucky.

I encourage physics majors to go crash the engineer's party and do their internships if you can. Of course, you might as well major in engineering at that point...

 

[Arsenic&Lace]

Yeah the environment and culture is more conducive to networking. If you just want a job, you shouldn't be getting a physics degree; no doubt the engineering department is superior in that regard.

But if you happen to be a physics major with a change of heart or in need of a back up plan with a year or two left to go, I think that an internship in your undergrad would put you in the same boat as the engineers.

 

[ModusPwnd]

At my school you are not allowed to apply for the school sponsored engineering internships unless you are an engineering major of a certain standing. Of course you can always try to arrange an internship yourself, outside of the school system.