- #1
pellman
- 684
- 5
A common exposition of Hamiltonian mechanics (e.g., Goldstein's Classical Mechanics) is to start with the action
[tex]S=\int{L dt }[/tex]
then show that the Euler-Lagrange equations extremize the action, then define the hamiltonian in terms of the lagrangian, then translate the Euler-Lagrange equations into the equivalent Hamilton equations.
But what does it look like using the Hamiltonian from the beginning?
[tex]S=\int{(\sum{p_j dq_j}-H(p_i,q_i)dt)}[/tex]
And do we have to rewrite it as
[tex]S=\int{(\sum{p_j \frac{dq_j}{dt}}-H(p_i,q_i))dt}[/tex]
to accomplish it? I am eventually going to be relating it to some relativistic problems in which t becomes a coordinate.
Any info and/or link is appreciated.
[tex]S=\int{L dt }[/tex]
then show that the Euler-Lagrange equations extremize the action, then define the hamiltonian in terms of the lagrangian, then translate the Euler-Lagrange equations into the equivalent Hamilton equations.
But what does it look like using the Hamiltonian from the beginning?
[tex]S=\int{(\sum{p_j dq_j}-H(p_i,q_i)dt)}[/tex]
And do we have to rewrite it as
[tex]S=\int{(\sum{p_j \frac{dq_j}{dt}}-H(p_i,q_i))dt}[/tex]
to accomplish it? I am eventually going to be relating it to some relativistic problems in which t becomes a coordinate.
Any info and/or link is appreciated.