How hot is the Sun in space? (James Webb related)

In summary: A black surface has no light to radiate from it!But if you consider a surface that is not perfectly black, but has some light reflecting off it, then some of the sunlight will be absorbed and some will be radiated back as visible light. The ratio of the radiation received to the radiation emitted is called the "albedo" of the surface.The albedo of a surface is the ratio of the radiation received to the radiation emitted.The albedo of a surface is the ratio of the radiation received to the radiation emitted.There is a formula to calculate the irradiance of an object in space, but it's not about how hot the Sun is (the radiation
  • #1
brajesh
62
15
TL;DR Summary
James Webb temperature differential 318 degrees!
I'm reading about the engineering of the James Webb and it surprised me that the temperature difference will be about 318 degrees from one side of the telescope compared to the other (85 C on one side and -233 on the other).

I didn't expect space to be that hot about a million miles further from the sun than the Earth is!
I guess our atmosphere really helps to reduce the heat of the sun!

Is there a formula to calculate how hot the sun is in space, suppose X million miles from the sun?
 
  • Like
Likes KurtLudwig
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
It is not about how hot the Sun is (the radiation from the Sun always has the same temperature), but about the solar irradience which follows the inverse square law.

Once you have irradience you need to consider how an object absorbs the sunlight and cools itself by radiating.
 
  • Like
Likes Kumail Haider, KurtLudwig, brajesh and 1 other person
  • #3
Orodruin said:
...but about the solar irradience which follows the inverse square law.
...which is about 1000 Watts / sq meter.
 
  • Like
Likes Kumail Haider, KurtLudwig and brajesh
  • #4
brajesh said:
I didn't expect space to be that hot about a million miles further from the sun than the Earth is!

Compared to the distance between the Earth and the Sun, a million miles isn't that far. The Sun-Earth L2 point, which is roughly 930,000 miles from Earth, is only about 1% farther way from the sun than the distance from the Sun to the Earth (about 93,000,000 miles).

For comparison, if you were about 100 yards (almost 100 meters) away from a flagpole/streetlight/something, and that distance represents the distance between the Earth and Sun, you could reach out your arm and touch the L2 point.

brajesh said:
I guess our atmosphere really helps to reduce the heat of the sun!

In terms of overall energy, not so much. About 2/3 of the Sun's energy reaching Earth is absorbed by Earth (i.e., only about 1/3 the energy is reflected). As a matter of fact, the atmosphere keeps the Earth warmer than it otherwise would be, on average, due to the greenhouse effect.

What keeps the Earth from getting hotter than it already is, and the same applies to the the JWST, is that empty space (such as what the side of an object not illuminated by the sun "sees") is really, really cold.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Kumail Haider, KurtLudwig, russ_watters and 2 others
  • #5
brajesh said:
Summary:: James Webb temperature differential 318 degrees!

I guess our atmosphere really helps to reduce the heat of the sun!
I assume you mean by "the heat", the radiation arriving at the surface. This is more or less constant as Earth is always pretty much the same distance from the Sun (nearly circular orbit).
What happens to the Earth is just a more complicated version of what is happening in JWST. There are a range of temperatures on Earth and in the atmosphere and the rates of gain and loss of Energy for Earth would be constant if the system were in complete equilibrium. Obvs, daytime and nighttime temperatures are different but there is a lot of thermal lag and the atmosphere contributes to this. Cloudy nights are warmer than cloudless nights etc..
JWST has no atmosphere and it always faces in the same direction relative the Sun. There is still some heat admitted by the heat shield and some small transfer through the craft but a Delta T of 300C is pretty useful.

BTW, the Earth and Moon are nearby 'hot' bodies and the heat shield also helps to reduce the effect of heat radiation from both. (Plus, man made interference, I imagine).
 
  • Like
Likes KurtLudwig and brajesh
  • #6
brajesh said:
Summary:: James Webb temperature differential 318 degrees!

I'm reading about the engineering of the James Webb and it surprised me that the temperature difference will be about 318 degrees from one side of the telescope compared to the other (85 C on one side and -233 on the other).

I didn't expect space to be that hot about a million miles further from the sun than the Earth is!
I guess our atmosphere really helps to reduce the heat of the sun!

Is there a formula to calculate how hot the sun is in space, suppose X million miles from the sun?
It is not so much atmosphere, but rotation of Earth.
Earth is a sphere. Which means that Earth has 4 times the area of its cross-section.
Yes, the poles are turned away from Sun. But Earth rotates. The circumference of a circle is still π times its diametre, so even equator has night half of day, and most of the rest the Sun is not at zenith.
If you consider a surface that faces Sun all the time, and is perfectly insulated on its back, then all the incoming sunlight must be radiated back as infrared. Which is 4 times more than Earth gets on average, and π times more than equator gets on average. Thus calculate fourth root of π, because the infrared radiation is proportional to T4.
 
  • Like
Likes KurtLudwig and brajesh
  • #7
snorkack said:
all the incoming sunlight must be radiated back as infrared.
That would only apply to a black surface. A very reflective surface would only absorb less than 1% and reflect the rest. On JWST the multiple layers help further. It can be really handy to have your own built in vacuum flask!
 
  • Like
Likes KurtLudwig, russ_watters and brajesh
  • #8
-
sophiecentaur said:
That would only apply to a black surface. A very reflective surface would only absorb less than 1% and reflect the rest
As long as the surface is gray (shows no wavelength preference) and one considers only radiative processes, the steady state equilibrium temperature is independent of emissivity. By detailed balance the emissivity and absorbtivity must be the same.
A gray Earth and a black Earth will each end up at 300K.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and brajesh
  • #9
russ_watters said:
...which is about 1000 Watts / sq meter.

Shouldn't this get less as you get further away from the sun?
 
  • #10
brajesh said:
Shouldn't this get less as you get further away from the sun?
JWST is not going that far from earth, only about 1 million miles, compared to the distance from the sun ~93 million miles (~149.6 million km). The "1000 Watts / sq meter" is at Earth's distance from the sun.
 
  • Like
Likes brajesh and russ_watters
  • #11
hutchphd said:
As long as the surface is gray (shows no wavelength preference)
Yes. You are strictly right about that. I actually meant almost totally absorbent. That would mean a very very dark colour, whichever you would call the colour - looking at it - or the "wavelength preferences".
 
  • #12
Astronuc said:
JWST is not going that far from earth, only about 1 million miles, compared to the distance from the sun ~93 million miles (~149.6 million km). The "1000 Watts / sq meter" is at Earth's distance from the sun.
And if we want to be pedantic, I pulled that number out of the air without checking. Checking now, it is 1,360 for Earth so using the inverse square law that gives 1,125 w/sq m at L2.
 
  • #13
Astronuc said:
JWST is not going that far from earth, only about 1 million miles, compared to the distance from the sun ~93 million miles (~149.6 million km). The "1000 Watts / sq meter" is at Earth's distance from the sun.
ok. So how could I use the distance in a formula to get the watts per meter squared?

What is it at 50 million miles?
At 200 million miles?
etc?
 
  • #14
brajesh said:
ok. So how could I use the distance in a formula to get the watts per meter squared?

What is it at 50 million miles?
At 200 million miles?
etc?
The factor is 1 divided by the distance delta, squared (per my previous).
 
  • Like
Likes brajesh
  • #15
russ_watters said:
The factor is 1 divided by the distance delta, squared (per my previous).
Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #16
brajesh said:
What is it at 50 million miles?
At 200 million miles?
etc?
One would take the total radiance of the sun (in kW) and divide by the surface area of the spherical area (4πR2) at distance R from the sun.

Consider that Skylab needed a sun shade while in Earth's orbit.
https://www.space.com/15705-skylab-sun-shade.html
 
  • Like
Likes brajesh
  • #17
russ_watters said:
And if we want to be pedantic, I pulled that number out of the air without checking. Checking now, it is 1,360 for Earth so using the inverse square law that gives 1,125 w/sq m at L2.
I get 1333 w/sq m at L2. (using 1360 w/m^2 @ 149.6e6 km and L2 = 151.1e6 km)

brajesh said:
...

Is there a formula to calculate how hot the sun is in space, suppose X million miles from the sun?
Have you written down the formula yet? I'm curious if it matches mine. Thanks!
 
  • #18
russ_watters said:
And if we want to be pedantic, I pulled that number out of the air without checking. Checking now, it is 1,360 for Earth so using the inverse square law that gives 1,125 w/sq m at L2.
L2 is 1 million miles farther. $$\delta=\frac 1 {93}$$
$$(1+\delta)^{-2}\approx(1-2\delta)$$ so the difference should be about 2% which is ##27W/m^2##

OOPs:minus
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes brajesh
  • #19
How much of Sun´s disc shows at L2? How much of Sun´s luminosity, accounting for limb darkening? Some does, because Earth is denser than Sun, so L2 is in antumbra, not umbra.
Uranus is less dense than Sun. Is Uranus´ L2 a place where the sun does not shine?
 
  • #20
snorkack said:
How much of Sun´s disc shows at L2? How much of Sun´s luminosity, accounting for limb darkening? Some does, because Earth is denser than Sun, so L2 is in antumbra, not umbra.
Uranus is less dense than Sun. Is Uranus´ L2 a place where the sun does not shine?
Nasa website says that Webb's orbit at L2 will be similar in size to the Moon's orbit around the Earth. I don't know how much sun would be at the center of L2, but I know Webb will not be in the center.
 
  • Like
Likes brajesh
  • #21
There are issues for radio communication if the Earth is not angularly separated from the sun for the Webb antennas. I had originally thought they would use the Earth to eclipse the sun but quick consideration of lunar eclipses tells you the Earth ain't big enough.
 
  • Like
Likes brajesh
  • #22
brajesh said:
Summary:: James Webb temperature differential 318 degrees!

I'm reading about the engineering of the James Webb and it surprised me that the temperature difference will be about 318 degrees from one side of the telescope compared to the other (85 C on one side and -233 on the other).
I wonder from where they got the 85C on the hot side.
What heat sources are they including?
hutchphd said:
A gray Earth and a black Earth will each end up at 300K.
Additional source would be radiation ( and reflection ) from the moon and earth, which they did mention - about 30 watts or so.
And heat from the cool side.
The article did not go into that aspect.
 
  • Like
Likes brajesh
  • #23
256bits said:
I wonder from where they got the 85C on the hot side.
It essentially the temperature on sunward Earth if it didn't rotate. The radiation emitted would be then cut in half and the Temperature increased by ## \sqrt[4] 2 ## so ##T=(300K) \sqrt[4] 2=357K## . Not complicated.
 
  • Like
Likes 256bits
  • #24
hutchphd said:
It essentially the temperature on sunward Earth if it didn't rotate.
That would apply to the Earth's surface (not the atmosphere) in a very simple model. The effective mean temperature of the Earth has to be such as to produce thermal equilibrium. But there's nowhere actually at that temperature.
A fast spinning metal satellite would end up at 300K (+/-). The conductivity of a body in orbit has to be taken into account and also the colours (reflectivity) of the faces. So, if you take a satellite with a 365day rotation period, paint it white on the sunny side and black on the dark side, the core temperature would be much lower (and vice versa). The 'average' temperature over the surface would still be 300K. Inside, you could arrange for anything in between. JWST's heat shield gets VERY hot but that allows the cold side to be very cold.
 
  • #25
Note, the moon rotates slowly, has no atmosphere and is pretty black. Its sunny-side temp is 120C.
 
Last edited:
  • #26
russ_watters said:
Note, the moon rotates slowly, has no atmosphere and is pretty black. It's sunny-side temp is 120C.
A very simple situation compared with us but it makes the point.
The side in shadow will be pretty darn cold. But a month is quite a short time for thermal matters in a big rock.
 

FAQ: How hot is the Sun in space? (James Webb related)

1. How does the James Webb telescope measure the temperature of the Sun in space?

The James Webb telescope does not directly measure the temperature of the Sun. Instead, it uses specialized instruments to measure the radiation emitted by the Sun, which can then be used to calculate its temperature.

2. What is the approximate temperature of the Sun in space according to the James Webb telescope?

The James Webb telescope has the ability to measure the temperature of the Sun's surface, which is approximately 5,500 degrees Celsius (9,932 degrees Fahrenheit).

3. Can the James Webb telescope measure the temperature of the Sun's core?

No, the James Webb telescope is not able to measure the temperature of the Sun's core. It can only measure the temperature of the Sun's surface.

4. How does the temperature of the Sun in space affect the James Webb telescope's operations?

The James Webb telescope is designed to withstand extreme temperatures, including the high temperatures of the Sun in space. However, it does have a sunshield that helps to protect it from the Sun's heat and radiation.

5. How does the temperature of the Sun in space compare to other stars in the universe?

The Sun's temperature is considered to be average compared to other stars in the universe. There are much hotter and much cooler stars out there, with temperatures ranging from thousands to millions of degrees Celsius.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
632
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top