- #1
Karagoz
Hi.
From what I read, according to Quantum mechanics "even though it looks like objects are in definite places, when we get down to ridiculously tiny objects (like electrons) they seem to be not he in anyone place. And everything looks like a hazy clouds of probability."
https://www.quora.com/What-is-quantum-physics-in-the-most-layman-terms/answer/Henry-Rasia?srid=33Qhr
And Niels Bohr wasn't against quantum mechanics.
But doesn't it contradict with Bohr's atom model, where in his model electrons move in fixed orbits around the nuclei?
Isn't the "elctron cloud model" more convenient with quantum mechanics?
From what I read, according to Quantum mechanics "even though it looks like objects are in definite places, when we get down to ridiculously tiny objects (like electrons) they seem to be not he in anyone place. And everything looks like a hazy clouds of probability."
https://www.quora.com/What-is-quantum-physics-in-the-most-layman-terms/answer/Henry-Rasia?srid=33Qhr
And Niels Bohr wasn't against quantum mechanics.
But doesn't it contradict with Bohr's atom model, where in his model electrons move in fixed orbits around the nuclei?
Isn't the "elctron cloud model" more convenient with quantum mechanics?