How is Complex z Raised to a Power Equal to Exponential?

  • Thread starter naggy
  • Start date
In summary, the equation z^a = exp(a * ln(z)) is usually true, but may not be true if using different branches of the logarithm. This is due to the extra factor of 2*pi*n or iarg in the equation. The equation a*log|z| = log(e^(a*log|z|)) is always true for real numbers, but may require additional calculations for complex numbers.
  • #1
naggy
60
0
How can this be true(z is complex)

z^a = exp(a * ln(z))

but in general ln(z^a) is not equal to a * ln(z)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Are you mainly interested in the case where [itex]a\in\mathbb{R}[/itex]? (Answer would be simpler then)
 
  • #3
Well, anyway, I'll assume that [itex]a\in\mathbb{R}[/itex]. Arbitrary [itex]a\in\mathbb{C}[/itex] would result in more calculating, but I don't believe there would be anything highly different.

naggy said:
How can this be true(z is complex)

z^a = exp(a * ln(z))

This equation is usually true, because it is the definition of the left side. First you must decide what argument function [itex]\textrm{arg}:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}[/itex] you are using. This choice will fix the branch of the logarithm,

[tex]
\log(z) = \log |z| + i\textrm{arg}(z),
[/tex]

and then we denote

[tex]
z^a := e^{a\log (z)}.
[/tex]

The equation is not necessarily true, if you start using other branches of logarithm later, of course.

but in general ln(z^a) is not equal to a * ln(z)

This is not true always because of the branch cuts.

[tex]
\log (z^a) = \log(e^{a\log(z)}) = \log( \underbrace{e^{a\log |z|}}_{\in\mathbb{R}} \underbrace{e^{ia\textrm{arg}(z)}}_{\in S^1\subset\mathbb{C}} ) = \log(e^{a\log |z|}) \;+\; i\textrm{arg}(e^{ia\textrm{arg}(z)})
[/tex]

[tex]
a\log(z) = a\log |z| + ia\textrm{arg}(z)
[/tex]

The equation

[tex]
a\log |z| = \log(e^{a\log |z|})
[/tex]

is always true, but

[tex]
a\textrm{arg}(z) = \textrm{arg}(e^{ia\textrm{arg}(z)}) + 2\pi n
[/tex]

may need some [itex]n\in\mathbb{Z}[/itex] depending on how the argument function happens to behave with these [itex]a,z[/itex].
 
Last edited:
  • #4
jostpuur said:
Well, anyway, I'll assume that [itex]a\in\mathbb{R}[/itex]. Arbitrary [itex]a\in\mathbb{C}[/itex] would result in more calculating, but I don't believe there would be anything highly different.



This equation is usually true, because it is the definition of the left side. First you must decide what argument function [itex]\textrm{arg}:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{R}[/itex] you are using. This choice will fix the branch of the logarithm,

[tex]
\log(z) = \log |z| + i\textrm{arg}(z),
[/tex]

and then we denote

[tex]
z^a := e^{a\log (z)}.
[/tex]

The equation is not necessarily true, if you start using other branches of logarithm later, of course.



This is not true always because of the branch cuts.

[tex]
\log (z^a) = \log(e^{a\log(z)}) = \log( \underbrace{e^{a\log |z|}}_{\in\mathbb{R}} \underbrace{e^{ia\textrm{arg}(z)}}_{\in S^1\subset\mathbb{C}} ) = \log(e^{a\log |z|}) \;+\; i\textrm{arg}(e^{ia\textrm{arg}(z)})
[/tex]

[tex]
a\log(z) = a\log |z| + ia\textrm{arg}(z)
[/tex]

The equation

[tex]
a\log |z| = \log(e^{a\log |z|})
[/tex]

is always true, but

[tex]
a\textrm{arg}(z) = \textrm{arg}(e^{ia\textrm{arg}(z)}) + 2\pi n
[/tex]

may need some [itex]n\in\mathbb{Z}[/itex] depending on how the argument function happens to behave with these [itex]a,z[/itex].


So... basically it's not true due to the extra 2*pi*n factor at the end?

No that can´t be true. Then the equation would be true for the principal value?

No wait. It's the extra iarg factor in this

[tex]
\log (z^a) = \log(e^{a\log(z)}) = \log( \underbrace{e^{a\log |z|}}_{\in\mathbb{R}} \underbrace{e^{ia\textrm{arg}(z)}}_{\in S^1\subset\mathbb{C}} ) = \log(e^{a\log |z|}) \;+\; i\textrm{arg}(e^{ia\textrm{arg}(z)})
[/tex]

If there is no iarg, then there is only log(e^(a*log|z|)) which is |z|^a and this is true for the real numbers since |z| is really replaced by x
 
Last edited:

FAQ: How is Complex z Raised to a Power Equal to Exponential?

How do you raise a complex number to a power?

To raise a complex number, z, to a power, n, you can use the formula z^n = (r^n)*(cos(n*theta) + i*sin(n*theta)), where r is the magnitude of z and theta is the angle of z in polar form.

What does it mean to raise a complex number to an exponential power?

Raising a complex number to an exponential power means to take the complex number and multiply it by itself a certain number of times, where the number of times is given by the exponent.

What is an example of raising a complex number to an exponential power?

An example would be raising the complex number 2+3i to the power of 4. This would result in (2+3i)^4 = (2+3i)*(2+3i)*(2+3i)*(2+3i) = -244+96i.

Why is it useful to raise a complex number to a power equal to an exponential?

This concept is useful in many areas of mathematics, such as in solving differential equations and in expressing certain types of functions. It also has applications in physics and engineering, especially in the study of oscillations and wave phenomena.

Is raising a complex number to a power equal to an exponential always possible?

Yes, it is always possible to raise a complex number to a power equal to an exponential, since the formula for raising a complex number to a power can be used for any value of n, including exponential values. However, the result may not always be a real number, as it depends on the values of z and n.

Back
Top