- #1
fable121
- 3
- 0
The velocity of a automatic chuck for moving the wire through a nail making machine may be found from the expression:
v=0.1t(1-t) where v is velocity (m/s) and t is time (sec)
i) using integration calculate the distance moved by the chuck between two times when velocity is 0.
what I did first was change it to 0.1t - 0.1t²
and when t = 1 you get (0.1*1²/2), which = 0.05 and when t = 0 obviously the answer will be 0
So I've got the distance moved as 0.05m
Not really sure if that's right, any help would be great :)
ii) Verify the results obtained in part (i) by using the approximate numerical method known as the Trapezoidal Rule.
Not quite as sure with this one
http://[URL=http://imageshack.us][PLAIN]http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/5751/calky2.png [/URL][/PLAIN] I think this has something to do with it, I'm also pretty sure I'm meant to use the values 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1 with the formula v=0.1t(1-t) those values being t
As I said I'm a bit unsure so any help would be great :)
v=0.1t(1-t) where v is velocity (m/s) and t is time (sec)
i) using integration calculate the distance moved by the chuck between two times when velocity is 0.
what I did first was change it to 0.1t - 0.1t²
and when t = 1 you get (0.1*1²/2), which = 0.05 and when t = 0 obviously the answer will be 0
So I've got the distance moved as 0.05m
Not really sure if that's right, any help would be great :)
ii) Verify the results obtained in part (i) by using the approximate numerical method known as the Trapezoidal Rule.
Not quite as sure with this one
http://[URL=http://imageshack.us][PLAIN]http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/5751/calky2.png [/URL][/PLAIN] I think this has something to do with it, I'm also pretty sure I'm meant to use the values 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1 with the formula v=0.1t(1-t) those values being t
As I said I'm a bit unsure so any help would be great :)
Last edited by a moderator: