How is error and uncertainty in data assessed & quantified

In summary, to quantify the uncertainty in the best fit line you can use the standard deviation of the data points and for estimating the age of the Hyades cluster, you will need to consider the uncertainties in distance measurements of the stars in the cluster.
  • #1
draks
1
0
In the following question the points were scattered in a graph with a negative gradient. The scatter was obvious. A best fit line was drawn. How do I quantify the uncertainty?

Estimate the uncertainty on your distance by considering the possible range of
values for the best-fitting distance modulus. [2 marks]


Estimate the age of the Hyades cluster with an
approximate associated uncertainty. [3 marks]
As a guess I just drew 2 parallel lines to the best fit, one went through the greatest point and the other through the least point.

The work has been submitted so your kind reply will not improve my mark but my mark will be honest.

As a matter of importance, when I am presented with data values with no mention of error ranges in the table how can I give a value of error to the data.

A major mark looser has been answers quoted to too many sig figs. eg 3.1415926588 instead of 3.1. I have known this since childhood and have endured punishment for too many sig figs at that time. Are there any tutorials in these arena?

Thank you in advance for your kind attention
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
.For quantifying the uncertainty in the best fit line, you can use the standard deviation of the data points from the best fit line to estimate the range of possible values. For example, if the standard deviation is 0.1, then you can assume that the best fit line could lie anywhere between 0.1 above and 0.1 below the best fit line. To estimate the age of the Hyades cluster with an associated uncertainty, you will need to consider the uncertainties related to the distance measurements of the stars in the cluster. This can be done by calculating the mean and standard deviation of the measured distances and using this to calculate a likely age range for the cluster.
 
  • #3
.

Thank you for your question. As a scientist, it is important to assess and quantify the error and uncertainty in data in order to accurately interpret and draw conclusions from the results. In the scenario you have described, the scatter in the data points and the negative gradient of the graph indicate that there is some level of uncertainty in the data.

One way to quantify this uncertainty is by calculating the standard deviation of the data points from the best fit line. This will give you a measure of how much the data points deviate from the line, and therefore, the level of uncertainty in the data. Additionally, you can also calculate the coefficient of determination (R-squared value) which indicates the percentage of variation in the data that is explained by the best fit line. A lower R-squared value would indicate a higher level of uncertainty in the data.

In order to estimate the uncertainty in your distance measurement, you can consider the possible range of values for the best-fitting distance modulus. This can be done by calculating the upper and lower bounds for the distance modulus using the standard deviation and incorporating these values into your final distance measurement.

Similarly, to estimate the age of the Hyades cluster with an approximate uncertainty, you can use the same approach by considering the range of values for the best-fitting age. The uncertainty can then be calculated by incorporating the standard deviation into your final age measurement.

Regarding your concern about providing an error value for data with no mention of error ranges, it is important to communicate with the data provider and understand the methods and techniques used to obtain the data. This will help in determining the appropriate error values to assign to the data.

Lastly, I understand your concern about providing too many significant figures in calculations. It is important to use the appropriate number of significant figures to avoid overestimating the precision of the data. I suggest referring to tutorials or guidelines on significant figures and practicing with sample data to improve your understanding and accuracy in this aspect.

I hope this response has been helpful. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to reach out.

Best regards,
 

FAQ: How is error and uncertainty in data assessed & quantified

1. How is error and uncertainty defined in data analysis?

Error and uncertainty refer to the difference between the true value and the measured value of a quantity. Error is the difference between the measured value and the true value, while uncertainty is the range of values within which the true value is expected to lie.

2. What are the types of errors in data analysis?

There are three main types of errors in data analysis: systematic, random, and human error. Systematic errors occur due to flaws in the measurement process, while random errors result from chance variations in the measurement. Human errors are caused by mistakes made by the individuals collecting or processing the data.

3. How is error and uncertainty quantified in data analysis?

Error and uncertainty can be quantified using statistical methods such as standard deviation, mean absolute error, and confidence intervals. These methods allow for the calculation of the degree of variability and confidence in the measured values.

4. What are the sources of uncertainty in data analysis?

Sources of uncertainty in data analysis can include instrument limitations, measurement errors, human errors, sampling errors, and environmental factors. These sources can impact the accuracy and precision of the data and contribute to the overall uncertainty.

5. How can error and uncertainty be minimized in data analysis?

To minimize error and uncertainty in data analysis, it is important to use appropriate measurement techniques, calibrate instruments regularly, and perform multiple measurements. Additionally, having a well-designed experimental or sampling plan and adequate data quality control measures can also help to reduce error and uncertainty.

Similar threads

Back
Top