How is f(x)=sqrt(x) a valid function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CuriousBanker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The square root function f(x) = sqrt(x) is considered valid because it adheres to the definition of a function, which states that each input must have a single output. While the equation a^2 = x yields both positive and negative solutions, the square root function specifically refers to the positive solution, denoted as sqrt(x). This convention is not an oversight but a standard practice to maintain the function's validity. Thus, sqrt(x) is defined as the positive number a such that a^2 = x, effectively providing a unique output for each input. The discussion clarifies that this approach does not ignore solutions but rather specifies the principal square root.
CuriousBanker
190
24
Hello

My teacher has told me the square root function is a valid function. He has also told me that a function cannot possibly have two different output for one given input. 36^1/2 for instance has both -6 and +6 as answers. He told me to just refer to the positive square root...eh, that seems kind of sloppy to just ignore half of the answers out of convenience, no?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
is defined to be the positive number such that . It isn't ignoring half the answers unless you are asked for the numbers that solve the equation and give the answer instead of .
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top