How Is the Hermitian Adjoint of a Covariant Differential Operator Calculated?

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of a covariant differential in calculating (D_\mu H) ^{\dagger} (D^\mu H) and the confusion surrounding the correct format of (D_\mu H) ^{\dagger}. The possibility of understanding or calculating the equation more easily in the momentum basis is also mentioned.
  • #1
student111
16
0

Homework Statement



Im am considering a covariant differential:

D_\mu H = ( partial_\mu + \frac{1}{2} i g \tau_j W_{j\mu} + ig B_\mu ) H

H is an isospiner, \tau_j are the pauli spin matrices, \partial_\mu is the four-gradient \frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu} and W_{j \mu} and B_\mu are gauge fields.

I want to calculate (D_\mu H) ^{\dagger} (D^\mu H) but keep getting the wrong answer. So I've begun to doubt wether i do (D_\mu H) ^{\dagger} correct. Is it:

(D_\mu H)) ^{\dagger}= \partial_\mu H^{\dagger} - \frac{1}{2}ig H^{\dagger} \tau_j W_{j \mu} - H^{\dagger} i g B_\mu ?

or will the first term be: H^{\dagger} \partial_\mu ?

Any help would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Please use the [ tex ] ... [ / tex ] tags (without the spaces in the tags) for your equations. They are hard to read in plain text. I'll do this one for you:



Im am considering a covariant differential:

[tex]
D_\mu H = ( \partial_\mu + \frac{1}{2} i g \tau_j W_{j\mu} + ig B_\mu ) H
[/tex]

H is an isospiner, [itex]\tau_j[/tex] are the pauli spin matrices, [itex]\partial_\mu[/itex] is the four-gradient [itex]\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}[/itex] and [itex]W_{j \mu}[/itex] and [itex]B_\mu[/itex] are gauge fields.

I want to calculate [itex](D_\mu H) ^{\dagger} (D^\mu H)[/itex] but keep getting the wrong answer. So I've begun to doubt wether i do [itex](D_\mu H) ^{\dagger}[/itex] correct. Is it:

[tex]
(D_\mu H) ^{\dagger}= \partial_\mu H^{\dagger} - \frac{1}{2}ig H^{\dagger} \tau_j W_{j \mu} - H^{\dagger} i g B_\mu ?
[/tex]

or will the first term be: [itex]H^{\dagger} \partial_\mu[/itex] ?

Any help would be much appreciated!
What does it look like in the momentum basis? Whenever you have derivatives, you should ask yourself, "can I understand this better, or calculate this more easily, in the momentum basis?"
 
Last edited:

FAQ: How Is the Hermitian Adjoint of a Covariant Differential Operator Calculated?

What is the Hermitian adjoint of an operator?

The Hermitian adjoint of an operator, also known as the adjoint or adjugate, is a mathematical operation that involves taking the transpose of a complex matrix and then finding its complex conjugate. It is denoted by the dagger symbol (†) or a superscript asterisk (*).

What is the importance of the Hermitian adjoint in quantum mechanics?

In quantum mechanics, operators are used to represent physical observables such as position, momentum, and energy. The Hermitian adjoint of an operator is important because it allows us to calculate the expectation value of an observable, which is a key concept in quantum mechanics. It also plays a crucial role in determining the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of an operator, which are essential in solving quantum mechanical equations.

How is the Hermitian adjoint different from the transpose and complex conjugate?

The Hermitian adjoint is a combination of both the transpose and the complex conjugate operations. It differs from the transpose in that it involves taking the complex conjugate of each element in the matrix, not just the elements on the main diagonal. It differs from the complex conjugate in that it also involves taking the transpose of the matrix. In other words, the Hermitian adjoint involves both operations, while the transpose and complex conjugate are individual operations.

What are the properties of the Hermitian adjoint?

Some key properties of the Hermitian adjoint include: (1) the adjoint of an operator is linear, (2) the adjoint of the adjoint is the original operator, (3) the adjoint of the product of two operators is the product of their adjoints in reverse order, (4) the adjoint of a sum of operators is the sum of their adjoints, and (5) the Hermitian adjoint of a Hermitian operator is itself. These properties make the Hermitian adjoint a useful operation in performing calculations involving operators.

How is the Hermitian adjoint related to the inner product in a Hilbert space?

In a Hilbert space, the inner product is a mathematical operation that takes two vectors and produces a scalar value. The Hermitian adjoint of an operator is closely related to the inner product because it allows us to calculate the inner product of two vectors using the operator and its adjoint. Specifically, the inner product of two vectors can be written as the product of one vector with the adjoint of the operator acting on the other vector. This relationship is known as the Riesz representation theorem and is a fundamental concept in functional analysis.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top