- #1
Dreksler
- 14
- 4
- TL;DR Summary
- How is the popular estimate of the Earth's atmospheric mass correct if it is just based on the force applied per a certain surface area?
There is a number floating around on the internet that says that the mass of the Earth's atmosphere is about 5 quintillion kilograms. The way that that number was calculated was through knowing that per square meter of surface area at sea level, about 100,000 Newtons of force is applied, which then translated into kilograms per force is about 10,000 KpF, and then you just multiply that per square meter number with the Earth's surface area in meters.
Now what I am puzzled by is that since temperature affects the pressure, if for some reason the temperature suddenly dropped to about -50 degrees celsius globally, the pressure would too, meaning that a lower amount Newtons will be applied per squared meter, leading to a lower KpF number which then leads to a lower estimate of the Earth's mass through that method.
So then how is the 5 quintillion kilograms of total atmospheric mass of the Earth a correct number if the number is just based on the force applied? I am assuming that I am missing something large in my reasoning here so that is why I am asking for some clarification here on that number.
Now what I am puzzled by is that since temperature affects the pressure, if for some reason the temperature suddenly dropped to about -50 degrees celsius globally, the pressure would too, meaning that a lower amount Newtons will be applied per squared meter, leading to a lower KpF number which then leads to a lower estimate of the Earth's mass through that method.
So then how is the 5 quintillion kilograms of total atmospheric mass of the Earth a correct number if the number is just based on the force applied? I am assuming that I am missing something large in my reasoning here so that is why I am asking for some clarification here on that number.
Last edited by a moderator: