How is the Series ε + 2 ε^2 + 3 ε^3 + … Equal to ε/(1- ε)^2?

  • Thread starter jbowers9
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the mathematical manipulation of a series, g(ε), and how it can be written in terms of f’(ε). Through the use of geometric series results and derivatives, it is shown that g(ε) can be written in the form ε + 2 ε2 + 3 ε3 + … = ε/(1- ε)2 and this represents the average energy of a system.
  • #1
jbowers9
89
1
What they said:

f(ε) = Σ e-nε/kT n = 0 to ∞

Write the following series in terms of f’(ε):

g(ε) = Σ n ε e-nε/kT n = 0 to ∞

Then use the geometric series results to show that g can be written in the form:

ε + 2 ε2 + 3 ε3 + … = ε/(1- ε)2

What I did:

Let x = e-nε/kT

1/(1- x) = 1 + x + x2 + ...

1/(1- x)2 = 1 + 2x + 3x2 + 4x3 + ...

x/(1- x)2 = x + 2x2 + 3x3 + 4x4 +...

which leads me to:

g(ε) = ε e-nε/kT / (1 - e-nε/kT)2 n = 0 to ∞

How do they get, ε + 2 ε2 + 3 ε3 + … = ε/(1- ε)2

and what does it mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm not sure I understand your notation, please use proper parantheses.

Do you mean:

f(ε) = Σ e-nε/kT n = 0 to ∞

[tex] f(\epsilon) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} e^{-\frac{n \epsilon}{kT} [/tex]

OR

[tex] f(\epsilon) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-n \epsilon}}{kT} [/tex]

And what is your question?

Is it why does this hold:

[tex] \epsilon + 2 \epsilon^{2} + 3 \epsilon^{3} = \frac{\epsilon}{\left(1 - \epsilon \right)^2} [/tex]

If so, that's just taking derivative of both sides. If you need more clarification, let me know
 
  • #3
NoMoreExams said:
I'm not sure I understand your notation, please use proper parantheses.

Do you mean:

f(ε) = Σ e-nε/kT n = 0 to ∞

[tex] f(\epsilon) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} e^{-\frac{n \epsilon}{kT} [/tex]

OR

[tex] f(\epsilon) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-n \epsilon}}{kT} [/tex]

And what is your question?

Is it why does this hold:

[tex] \epsilon + 2 \epsilon^{2} + 3 \epsilon^{3} = \frac{\epsilon}{\left(1 - \epsilon \right)^2} [/tex]

If so, that's just taking derivative of both sides. If you need more clarification, let me know


The sum is the first one. The factor kT pegs this as a statistical mechanices problem.

Basically, to the OP, what the problem amounts to is that you have an infinite sum,

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\exp\left[-\frac{n\varepsilon}{k_BT}\right][/tex]

which is really just a geometric series: if you let [itex]x = \exp
\left[-\frac{\varepsilon}{k_BT}\right][/itex], you get

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^n = \frac{1}{1-x}[/tex]

(since the exponential is always less than one). Hence, if you take a derivative with respect to [itex]\beta = 1/(k_BT)[/itex] you get

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} n \varepsilon e^{-n \varepsilon \beta} = -\frac{\varepsilon e^{-\varepsilon \beta}}{(1-e^{-\varepsilon \beta})^2}[/tex]

which allows you to easily find the average energy of the system.

Or, even simpler, leaving it as x and differentiating with respect to that,

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} nx^{n-1} = \frac{1}{(1-x)^2}[/tex]

so just multiply by [itex]\varepsilon e^{-\varepsilon \beta}[/itex] to get

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} n \varepsilon x^n = \frac{\varepsilon x}{(1-x)^2}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #4
And what is your question?

Is it why does this hold:

ε + 2 ε2 + 3 ε3 + … = ε/(1- ε)2


If so, that's just taking derivative of both sides. If you need more clarification, let me know

How do they get, ε + 2 ε2 + 3 ε3 + … = ε/(1- ε)2

and what does it mean?

I understand how to proceed to get the expression

g(ε) = ε e-nε/kT / (1 - e-nε/kT)2 n = 0 to ∞

but epsilon is a constant, hυ, not e-nε/kT. Do they mean that ε = f(ε) = e-nε/kT? That makes sense then.
 

FAQ: How is the Series ε + 2 ε^2 + 3 ε^3 + … Equal to ε/(1- ε)^2?

What is the meaning of the symbols in the equation F(ε) = Σ e-nε/kT n = 0 to ∞?

The symbol F(ε) represents the free energy of a system at a given energy level ε. The symbol Σ (sigma) indicates a summation, while n represents the number of energy levels being summed. The term e-nε/kT is the Boltzmann factor, which takes into account the energy level (ε), the Boltzmann constant (k), and the temperature (T) of the system. The range of n = 0 to ∞ means that the summation is performed over all possible energy levels.

What is the significance of the equation F(ε) = Σ e-nε/kT n = 0 to ∞ in thermodynamics?

This equation is an expression of the Boltzmann distribution, which describes the probability of a system being in a particular energy state at a given temperature. It is used to calculate the equilibrium free energy of a system, which is a measure of the system's stability and the extent to which it can do work.

How does the equation F(ε) = Σ e-nε/kT n = 0 to ∞ relate to the second law of thermodynamics?

The second law of thermodynamics states that the total entropy (disorder) of a closed system will always increase over time. The equation F(ε) = Σ e-nε/kT n = 0 to ∞ is derived from this law and provides a way to calculate the equilibrium free energy of a system. This free energy can then be used to determine the direction of spontaneous reactions and the stability of a system.

Can the equation F(ε) = Σ e-nε/kT n = 0 to ∞ be applied to all systems?

The equation can be applied to systems that are in thermodynamic equilibrium, meaning that they are not changing over time. It is commonly used in the study of physical, chemical, and biological systems. However, it may not be applicable to systems that are far from equilibrium, such as highly reactive or rapidly changing systems.

How does the equation F(ε) = Σ e-nε/kT n = 0 to ∞ relate to the concept of entropy?

Entropy is a measure of the disorder or randomness in a system. The Boltzmann factor e-nε/kT in the equation F(ε) = Σ e-nε/kT n = 0 to ∞ takes into account the number of possible microstates (ways that energy can be distributed among particles) at a given energy level. As the number of microstates increases, so does the entropy. Therefore, the equation is closely related to the concept of entropy and can be used to calculate the equilibrium free energy and entropy of a system.

Back
Top