How long until two particle bunches catch up?

In summary: But for the problem, you only need to find the time according to the observer at rest, so "classical" physics is all you need. Yes, it's that simple.
  • #1
scienceman2k9
12
0
Problem:

An observer at rest in a laboratory sees particles emitted from a source. The first bunch of particles is emitted with speed v=0.92c; the second bunch emitted 10^-3 s later with v=0.99c. How long, according to the observer, will it be until the second bunch catches up with the first?

I'm not sure how straight forward this problem is. Using "classical" physics I get T=1.3*10^-2 s I am not sure what to account for in this problem...relativistic relative velocity maybe?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, use the relativistic formula for the speed of the second particles relative to the first:
[tex]\frac{v_2-v_1}{1- \frac{v_2v_1}{c^2}}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{.97- .92}{1- (.98)(.92)}c[/tex]

(By the way, classically it is 1.3* 10-3.)
 
  • #3
scienceman2k9 said:
I'm not sure how straight forward this problem is. Using "classical" physics I get T=1.3*10^-2 s I am not sure what to account for in this problem...relativistic relative velocity maybe?
The relativistic relative velocity would be needed if you were asked to solve the problem from the view of one of the particles. But here you only need to find the time according to the observer at rest, so "classical" physics is all you need. Yes, it's that simple. :wink:
 
  • #4
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, use the relativistic formula for the speed of the second particles relative to the first:
[tex]\frac{v_2-v_1}{1- \frac{v_2v_1}{c^2}}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{.97- .92}{1- (.98)(.92)}c[/tex]

(By the way, classically it is 1.3* 10-3.)
I am confused here. I don't see why the relativistic formula is used since all distance and time measurements take place in the observer's frame.

(First of all, shouldn't the .97 and .98 both be .99?)

If the observer sees the particles moving at .92c and .99c respectively, by definition he measures a speed difference of .07c. This means he measures their separation to decrease by 2.1x10^7 m (his metres) per second (his seconds). The first particle travels .92c x 10^-3 m = 2.8x10^5 m before the second particle starts. So it takes d/v = 1.3x10-2 seconds (his seconds) before the observer sees the two particles at the same position.

AM
 
  • #5
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, use the relativistic formula for the speed of the second particles relative to the first

If both speeds are with respect to the lab frame, then I don't think so.

Suppose that, in the lab frame, the first bunch of partcles propagates at speed [itex]v_1[/itex] from the spacetime origin, while the second bunch propagates at speed [itex]v_2[/itex] from [itex]x = 0[/itex] starting at [itex]t = T[/itex].

Then, it is straightforward to write down the equations of the two worldlines, and to find the lab time coordinate of the event at which the worldlines intersect.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
thanks!...the problem was pretty straight forward afterall
 
  • #7
scienceman2k9 said:
Problem:

An observer at rest in a laboratory sees particles emitted from a source. The first bunch of particles is emitted with speed v=0.92c; the second bunch emitted 10^-3 s later with v=0.99c. How long, according to the observer, will it be until the second bunch catches up with the first?

I'm not sure how straight forward this problem is. Using "classical" physics I get T=1.3*10^-2 s I am not sure what to account for in this problem...relativistic relative velocity maybe?
I think the "classical" answr is correct here. Using relative velocity would give the time in the rest system of one of the particles.
 

FAQ: How long until two particle bunches catch up?

What is special relativity?

Special relativity is a theory developed by Albert Einstein that explains the relationship between space and time in the presence of gravity. It states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion.

How does special relativity differ from general relativity?

Special relativity only applies to situations where the laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion, while general relativity also accounts for the effects of gravity on the fabric of space-time.

What is the speed of light in special relativity?

The speed of light, denoted by the letter "c", is a constant in special relativity and is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second.

Can special relativity be observed in everyday life?

Yes, special relativity is observable in everyday life. An example is the phenomenon of time dilation, where time appears to pass slower for objects moving at high speeds.

How has special relativity impacted our understanding of the universe?

Special relativity has had a significant impact on our understanding of the universe. It has led to important developments in fields such as cosmology and astrophysics, and has also helped to shape our understanding of space, time, and the fundamental laws of physics.

Similar threads

Back
Top