- #36
nitsuj
- 1,389
- 98
ParticleGrl said:I'm assuming the salary of the manager/owner of a large trucking company is larger than the salary of the driver (which is almost certainly true). Neither would have their job without the road network.
Exactly my thinking, however you may be countered with, "but the manager/owner doesn't need "that" money as much as the truck driver."
My logic is the rich are richer than the poorer, I measure "benefit" by richness.
Russ says the benefit of richness is diminishing, to an exactness that the poorer are the ones who benefit most from...I guess road / rail in this example.
I find it impossible to conceive how the poorer benefit more from road / rail than the richer. "More to lose" comes to mind...oh right utility of money..shoots .
Last edited: