- #1
Safinaz
- 261
- 8
I'm trying to understand how the RS model solved the hierarchy problem from this mass relation
$$ M^2_p = \frac{M^3}{k} \Large[1- e^{-2k\pi r} \Large],$$
Equ. 16 in their paper:
https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9905221
With k as large as the Planck scale, the exponential will be so small and almost has no effect, which leads to (is this correct? ), as they say in page 6, ##M \approx M_p##!
So the conflict rises here, cause ##M_p## is the four dimensional effective Planck scale ##\sim 10^{18}## GeV, while ##M## is the higher 5-dimensional Planck scale assumed to be at TeV scale, so what does ##M \approx M_p## mean?
Any help is appreciated!
See also the discussion in this thread:
[The hierarchy problem][1] [1]: https://physics.stackexchange.com/q...hy-problem?noredirect=1#comment1484638_661737
$$ M^2_p = \frac{M^3}{k} \Large[1- e^{-2k\pi r} \Large],$$
Equ. 16 in their paper:
https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9905221
With k as large as the Planck scale, the exponential will be so small and almost has no effect, which leads to (is this correct? ), as they say in page 6, ##M \approx M_p##!
So the conflict rises here, cause ##M_p## is the four dimensional effective Planck scale ##\sim 10^{18}## GeV, while ##M## is the higher 5-dimensional Planck scale assumed to be at TeV scale, so what does ##M \approx M_p## mean?
Any help is appreciated!
See also the discussion in this thread:
[The hierarchy problem][1] [1]: https://physics.stackexchange.com/q...hy-problem?noredirect=1#comment1484638_661737