How should I show that this root is given approximately by this?

  • #1
Math100
797
221
Homework Statement
By sketching the graphs of ## y=a^2-x^2 ## and ## y=\epsilon\sinh x ## for ## x\geq 0 ##, show that the equation ## a^2-x^2=\epsilon\sinh x, 0<\epsilon<<1 ##, has a root near ## x=a ##. Use perturbation theory to show that this root is given approximately by ## x=a-\frac{\epsilon}{2a}\sinh a+\frac{\epsilon^{2}}{16a^3}(2a\sinh 2a-\cosh 2a+1)+O(\epsilon^{3}) ##.
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof:

Consider the equation of ## a^2-x^2=\epsilon\sinh x ## for ## 0<\epsilon<<1 ##.
Let ## \epsilon=0 ##.
Then the unperturbed equation is ## a^2-x^2=0 ##.
This gives ## a^2-x^2=0\implies (a+x)(a-x)=0\implies x=\pm a ## with the root ## x=x_{0} ##
such that ## x_{0}(a)=a ## because ## x\geq 0 ## implies that ## x\neq -a ##.
Applying the perturbation theory produces ## x=a+\epsilon x_{1}+\epsilon^{2}x_{2}+O(\epsilon^{3}) ##
for ## 0<\epsilon<<1 ##.
By direct substitution of this expansion ## x=a+\epsilon x_{1}+\epsilon^{2}x_{2}+O(\epsilon^{3}) ##
into the equation ## a^2-x^2=\epsilon\sinh x, 0<\epsilon<<1 ## for ## x\geq 0 ##,
we get ## a^2-(a+\epsilon x_{1}+\epsilon^{2}x_{2}+O(\epsilon^{3}))^{2}=
\epsilon\sinh(a+\epsilon x_{1}+\epsilon^{2}x_{2}+O(\epsilon^{3})) ## for ## 0<\epsilon<<1 ##
where ## x\geq 0 ##.
Observe that ## a^2-(a+\epsilon x_{1}+\epsilon^{2}x_{2}+O(\epsilon^{3}))^{2}=
a^2-(a^2+a\epsilon x_{1}+a\epsilon^{2}x_{2}+aO(\epsilon^{3})+a\epsilon x_{1}+\epsilon^{2}x_{1}^{2}
+\epsilon^{3}x_{1}x_{2}+\epsilon x_{1}O(\epsilon^{3})+a\epsilon^{2}x_{2}
+\epsilon^{3}x_{1}x_{2}+
\epsilon^{4}x_{2}^{2}+\epsilon^{2}x_{2}O(\epsilon^{3})+aO(\epsilon^{3})+\epsilon x_{1}O(\epsilon^{3})
+\epsilon^{2}x_{2}O(\epsilon^{3})+(O(\epsilon^{3}))^{2} ##.
Thus, ## -2a\epsilon x_{1}-2a\epsilon^{2}x_{2}
-\epsilon^{2}x_{1}^{2}-2\epsilon^{3}x_{1}x_{2}-\epsilon^{4}x_{2}^{2}+O(\epsilon^{3}) ##.
Similarly, we will use the Taylor's series to expand ## \sinh(a+\epsilon x_{1}+\epsilon^{2}x_{2}+O(\epsilon^{3})) ##
where the Taylor's series expansion for the hyperbolic function is given by
## \sinh(x)=x+\frac{x^3}{3!}+\frac{x^5}{5!}+... ##.

For the first part of the question/problem, I've already obtained the sketch of the graphs of those two given
equations from my graphing calculator but I have doubt about the second part of the question/problem
where the proof is involved because I need to find both ## x_{1}, x_{2} ## in order to show the given
approximation but I want to know, how to use this direct substitution by using the Taylor's series expansion
of ## \sinh(x)=x+\frac{x^3}{3!}+\frac{x^5}{5!}+... ##? Or is this method even correct? May anyone please
check/verify/confirm to see if the work/proof shown above is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Expansion of x by ##\epsilon##
[tex]x=a+\epsilon x^{(1)}+\epsilon^2x^{(2)}+...[/tex]
[tex]\sinh x= \sinh a + \epsilon x^{(1)} \cosh a + ...[/tex]
by Taylor series. The equation
[tex]x^2-a^2=-\epsilon \sinh x[/tex]
[tex](\epsilon x^{(1)}+\epsilon^2 x^{(2)}+...)(2a+\epsilon x^{(1)}+\epsilon^2 x^{(2)}+...)[/tex]
[tex]=-\epsilon\sinh a - \epsilon^2 x^{(1)} \cosh a + ...[/tex]
Comparing the both sides in order ##\epsilon## terms
[tex]2ax^{(1)}=-\sinh a[/tex]
in order ##\epsilon^2## terms
[tex]2ax^{(2)}+(x^{(1)})^2=- x^{(1)} \cosh a[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Math100
  • #3
anuttarasammyak said:
Expansion of x by ##\epsilon##
[tex]x=a+\epsilon x^{(1)}+\epsilon^2x^{(2)}+...[/tex]
[tex]\sinh x= \sinh a + \epsilon x^{(1)} \cosh a + ...[/tex]
by Taylor series. The equation
[tex]x^2-a^2=-\epsilon \sinh x[/tex]
[tex](\epsilon x^{(1)}+\epsilon^2 x^{(2)}+...)(2a+\epsilon x^{(1)}+\epsilon^2 x^{(2)}+...)[/tex]
[tex]=-\epsilon\sinh a - \epsilon^2 x^{(1)} \cosh a + ...[/tex]
Comparing the both sides in order ##\epsilon## terms
[tex]2ax^{(1)}=-\sinh a[/tex]
in order ##\epsilon^2## terms
[tex]2ax^{(2)}+(x^{(1)})^2=- x^{(1)} \cosh a[/tex]
I finally solved this problem!
 
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak

FAQ: How should I show that this root is given approximately by this?

1. What does it mean to show that a root is given approximately by a certain value?

To show that a root is given approximately by a certain value means to demonstrate that the value you have is close to the actual root of an equation. This often involves evaluating the function at that value and checking if the result is near zero, or using methods such as numerical approximations or graphical analysis to illustrate the proximity of the value to the true root.

2. What methods can I use to approximate the root of a function?

There are several methods to approximate the root of a function, including the bisection method, Newton's method, and the secant method. Each method has its own advantages and is suited for different types of functions. The bisection method is simple and guarantees convergence, while Newton's method can be faster but requires the calculation of derivatives.

3. How can I verify that my approximation is accurate?

You can verify the accuracy of your approximation by substituting the approximate value back into the original function and checking the result. If the output is close to zero, your approximation is likely accurate. Additionally, you can use error analysis to quantify the difference between your approximation and the actual root.

4. Is it necessary to show the steps of my approximation process?

While it is not strictly necessary to show every step of your approximation process, doing so can enhance the clarity and rigor of your work. Providing detailed steps helps others understand your methodology and allows them to follow your reasoning, which is particularly important in academic and scientific contexts.

5. What should I do if my approximation does not seem accurate?

If your approximation does not seem accurate, you should first double-check your calculations and ensure that you are using the correct method. Consider refining your approximation by using a different method or adjusting the initial guess. Additionally, check for any potential errors in the formulation of the function or the assumptions made during the approximation process.

Similar threads

Back
Top