How should the money be divided between Frank and Sammy?

  • Thread starter tedbradly
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Riddle
It's not clear how the boys divided the melon or how much each of them ate. It's also not clear how much Billy paid for the 1/3 of the melon. In summary, there are many possible scenarios for dividing the money between Frank and Sammy, depending on how they divided the melon and how much Billy paid for his portion.
  • #1
tedbradly
85
1
Frank and Sammy bought a watermelon for forty-eight cents, Frank contributing thirty cents and Sammy eighteen, which they were going to divide in proportion to their relative investements, when, spying Billy passing on the road, they conspired to unload a third of the melon upon him for the cost of the whole. After Billy had gone the boys proceeded to divide the money as they thought right, and then each of them ate a half of the remainder. How should the money be divided between Frank and Sammy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Frank should get thirty cents and Sammy eighteen. That way, each equally contributed zero and each equally ate a third of the melon.
 
  • #3
Sammy should pay Frank 4 cents.

Frank bought 5/8 of a melon with his 30 cents and Sammy bought 3/8 with his 18 cents. So, Frank should get 5/8 of the money from Billy, plus 5/8 of the remainder of the melon, while Sammy gets 3/8 of the money from Billy, plus 3/8 of the remainder of the melon. There's 8/12 of a melon left and each ate 4/12 of a melon instead of 5/12 & 3/12, so Sammy owes Frank for 1/12 of a melon. And at 48 cents for a whole melon, that comes to 4 cents for a 1/12.
 
  • #4
BobG said:
Sammy should pay Frank 4 cents.

Frank bought 5/8 of a melon with his 30 cents and Sammy bought 3/8 with his 18 cents. So, Frank should get 5/8 of the money from Billy, plus 5/8 of the remainder of the melon, while Sammy gets 3/8 of the money from Billy, plus 3/8 of the remainder of the melon. There's 8/12 of a melon left and each ate 4/12 of a melon instead of 5/12 & 3/12, so Sammy owes Frank for 1/12 of a melon. And at 48 cents for a whole melon, that comes to 4 cents for a 1/12.

yup...
 
  • #5
I suppose it depends on whose 1/3 of the melon Billy purchased. Did 1/6 come from Frank and 1/6 come from Sammy? Or did they sell Billy the 1/3 according to the proportion they had divided the melon already? By rights, Sammy or Frank could have sold Billy the entire 1/3 out of their own portion, and then (being 48 cents richer), simply reimburse the other for the extra portion that they ate.

DaveE
 
  • #6
BobG said:
And at 48 cents for a whole melon, that comes to 4 cents for a 1/12.

Of course, would you pay the 48 cents/whole melon rate, or would you pay the 48 cents/third of a melon rate?

DaveE
 
  • #7
Official solution:

In the watermelon problem, some boys would say: Frank should get back his 30 cents and Charlie[sic] 18: then they get their feast for nothing. Brainy mathematicians would try to convince the boys that Frank owned 30-48 of the melon, and Sammy 18-48; and so Billy bought 16-48, Frank sold 14-48 and Sammy but 2-48, and as he got three times what his part cost, Frank should receive 42 cents and Sammy 6 cents. This is the answer given in the books, but just listen to what Sammy says is the correct answer: We bought the melon for 48 cents and unloaded on the guy 1-3 for the cost of the whole, so we each took back our original money. Now Sammy owns 18-48 of the remainder, which is 12-48 of the whole melon, and Frank owns 30-48 of the remainder, which is 20-48 of a melon, and as Sammy must now buy 4-48 to eat one-half, he pays Frank 4 cents and has 14 cents left, and Frank 34 cents. The error of the popular solution consists in permitting Frank to unload that 1-12 upon Sammy at a profit instead of at cost. Sammy was no guy!

His answers are riddles in and of themselves.
 
Last edited:

FAQ: How should the money be divided between Frank and Sammy?

1. How do you determine how much money each person should receive?

The division of money between Frank and Sammy should be based on factors such as their contributions to the project, their level of involvement, and any agreements or contracts that were previously made.

2. Is there a fair way to divide the money between the two individuals?

Yes, there are various methods that can be used to determine a fair division of money, such as proportional distribution based on each person's role and responsibilities, or equal distribution regardless of contributions.

3. What if one person believes they deserve a larger share of the money?

In this case, it is important to have a clear and open communication between both parties to discuss their reasons and come to a mutual agreement. If necessary, a mediator or third-party can be involved to help facilitate the discussion.

4. Should the money be divided based on seniority or experience?

Not necessarily. While seniority and experience can be taken into consideration, the main criteria for dividing the money should be the individuals' contributions and involvement in the project.

5. What happens if there is a disagreement over the division of money?

If there is a disagreement, it is important to try to come to a resolution through open communication and negotiation. If a resolution cannot be reached, it may be necessary to seek legal counsel or mediation to find a fair solution.

Back
Top