How to Calculate Final Velocities and Momenta in a Relativistic 2D Collision?

In summary, the conversation involves a problem involving four balls in a collision, with the incoming ball impacting two stationary balls in an equilateral triangle formation. The user is trying to find the final velocities, momenta, and kinetic energies of the balls. They have made some assumptions and provided their attempt at a solution, but there may be a mistake in their energy conservation equation. They are seeking feedback and clarification on their approach.
  • #1
neutrino2063
7
0

Homework Statement



See Pic.

Update: Pic works, take a look

Since the pic is not loading correctly yet, I shall try to described the situation. Ball 1 is coming in on the x-axis and impacts two balls (2 & 3) which are arranged vertically, centered at x=0 and the point at which they touch is the origin. So the incoming ball impacts the two stationary balls so that the triangle drawn between their centers is equilateral which means the impact angle is 30 degrees (or -30 for the bottom ball). The fourth ball is situated at 30 degrees above the top stationary ball so that the collision should be head on once the stationary ball has been scattered.

Incoming ball is along x-axis with speed v=.8c. Assume collision is still at 30 degrees (let's not assume Lorentz Contraction) and since the speed is "low enough" scattered balls continue you at 30 degrees. All balls have radius=1 and mass=m
(except ball 4 which has 3m). Assume ball 1 & 3 collide once.
Calculate all final velocities, momenta, and kinetic energies.

Homework Equations



[tex]\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}}[/tex]
[tex]\beta=\frac{\overrightarrow{v}}{c}[/tex]
[tex]\overrightarrow{p}=\gamma m\overrightarrow{v}[/tex]
[tex]E=\gamma mc^2[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



For the first collision:
We can show that energy conservation can be simplified to (dividing by mc^2):
[tex]\gamma_{0}+2=\gamma_{1}+\gamma_{2}+\gamma_{3}[/tex]

And that momentum conservation can be simplified to:

[tex]\overrightarrow{\beta_{0}}\gamma_{0}=\overrightarrow{\beta_{1}}\gamma_{1}+\overrightarrow{\beta_{2}}\gamma_{2}+\overrightarrow{\beta_{3}}\gamma_{3}[/tex]

Symmetry would say that: [tex]\gamma_{2}=\gamma_{3}[/tex]

Assuming ball 1 continues only along the x-axis then ball 2 & 3 will conserve momentum in the y-direction by having equal and opposite components.


If we assume that [tex]v_{1}[/tex] is only in the x direction then we know:
(Components and magnitudes written without vector arrow)

[tex]\gamma_{0}v_{0}=\gamma_{1}v_{1}+2\gamma_{2}v_{x_{2}}[/tex]

Where [tex]v_{x_{2}}=v_{2}\cos{\frac{\pi}{6}}[/tex]

Then the x momentum becomes can be transformed by using that relation and dividing by c to:

[tex]\beta_{0}\gamma_{0}=\beta_{1}\gamma_{1}+2\gamma_{2}\beta_{2}\cos{\frac{\pi}{6}}[/tex]

Then by substituting for [tex]\beta=\sqrt{1-\frac{1}{\gamma^2}}[/tex]
to get momentum in terms of [tex]\gamma[/tex] only, we can combine this with the energy conservation equation to solve for either [tex]\gamma_{2}[/tex] or [tex]\gamma_{1}[/tex] in terms of the initial [tex]\gamma_{0}=\frac{5}{3}[/tex]

Doing this I found that [tex]\gamma_{2}=1[/tex], which makes absolutely no sense. The problem seems as though it should be straight-forward and my assumptions I think are pretty decent. Any ideas or critiques would be appreciated. I feel like once I find one good value for a gamma everything else in the problem should be easy.
 

Attachments

  • collision.jpg
    collision.jpg
    19.6 KB · Views: 457
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2




Thank you for providing a detailed explanation of the problem and your attempt at a solution. It seems like you have a good understanding of the concepts involved and have made some good assumptions to simplify the problem. However, I believe there may be a mistake in your energy conservation equation. It should be \gamma_{0}+1=\gamma_{1}+\gamma_{2}+\gamma_{3}, as the incoming ball does not have any initial kinetic energy in the y-direction. This may explain why you are getting a value of 1 for \gamma_{2}. I would suggest going back through your calculations and checking for any other possible errors. Also, remember to consider the conservation of kinetic energy in the final solution, as the masses and velocities of the balls will affect their final energies. Keep up the good work and don't hesitate to ask for further clarification or assistance. Good luck!
 

FAQ: How to Calculate Final Velocities and Momenta in a Relativistic 2D Collision?

What is a 4 Body Relativistic Collision (2D)?

A 4 Body Relativistic Collision (2D) refers to a type of collision in which four particles interact with each other in a two-dimensional space, taking into account the principles of special relativity.

What is the significance of studying 4 Body Relativistic Collisions (2D)?

Studying 4 Body Relativistic Collisions (2D) allows scientists to better understand the dynamics and behavior of particles at high energies, such as those found in particle accelerators. It also helps to test and validate theories of special relativity.

How are 4 Body Relativistic Collisions (2D) calculated and analyzed?

4 Body Relativistic Collisions (2D) are calculated and analyzed using mathematical equations and computer simulations. Specialized software and algorithms are used to model the behavior of particles and predict the outcomes of collisions.

What are some real-life applications of 4 Body Relativistic Collisions (2D)?

One real-life application of 4 Body Relativistic Collisions (2D) is in medical imaging, specifically in positron emission tomography (PET) scans. These scans use the principles of special relativity to detect and map the location of positron-emitting particles in the body.

What are the potential implications of 4 Body Relativistic Collisions (2D) for our understanding of the universe?

Studying 4 Body Relativistic Collisions (2D) can help us gain a deeper understanding of the fundamental laws of physics and the nature of matter and energy. It may also provide insights into the origins and evolution of the universe, as well as the possibility of new discoveries and technologies.

Back
Top