How to calculate mass of closed Universe?

In summary, the equation calculates the mass of a closed universe by integrating over the radius. The difference between the two versions is that the first uses the cosine of the product of the two variables in the brackets, while the second uses the cosine of the product of the variable in the brackets and the cosine of the variable in the function.
  • #1
johne1618
371
0
How does one integrate the mass density over a closed Universe (a 3-sphere?) to obtain the total mass of that Universe?

Is this the correct integral?

[tex]
M = R(t)^3 \rho\int_0^1 4 \pi r^2 \frac{dr}{\sqrt{1-r^2}}
[/tex]

where [itex]R(t)[/itex] is the radius of the Universe at cosmological time [itex]t[/itex].

By making the substitution [itex]r=\sin \chi[/itex] one finds that the above integral gives:

[tex]
M = \pi^2 R(t)^3 \rho.
[/tex]

According to wikipedia the hyperarea of a 3-sphere is [itex]2\pi^2 R^3[/itex] so I'm out by a factor of two.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
  • #5
The former applies the cube to the brackets, the latter applies the cube to the function.
##R(t)^3=Rt^3##
##R^3(t)=\big [ R(t)\big ]^3##

compare: ##\cos(kx)^3## with ##\cos^3(kx)##
Since it is also valid to write ##\cos kx## the first version does not make it clear what is intended.
Is it the cosine of the cube of a product or the cube of the cosine of a product? OP only had one variable in the brackets, which gives notice to the reader.

... its really just a notation foible.
I don't think anyone would get confused in such a small equation but in big long multiline equations it gets easier to be misread.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Simon Bridge said:
The former applies the cube to the brackets, the latter applies the cube to the function.
##R(t)^3=Rt^3##
##R^3(t)=\big [ R(t)\big ]^3##

compare: ##\cos(kx)^3## with ##\cos^3(kx)##
Since it is also valid to write ##\cos kx## the first version does not make it clear what is intended.
Is it the cosine of the cube of a product or the cube of the cosine of a product? OP only had one variable in the brackets, which gives notice to the reader.

... its really just a notation foible.
I don't think anyone would get confused in such a small equation but in big long multiline equations it gets easier to be misread.

I understand, thanks!
 

FAQ: How to calculate mass of closed Universe?

What is the definition of mass in the context of a closed Universe?

In the context of a closed Universe, mass refers to the total amount of matter and energy contained within the boundaries of the Universe.

How is the mass of a closed Universe calculated?

The mass of a closed Universe can be calculated using the Friedmann equations, which take into account the curvature of space, the expansion rate of the Universe, and the density of matter and energy.

What are the units of measurement for the mass of a closed Universe?

The units of measurement for the mass of a closed Universe are typically expressed in solar masses or kilograms.

Can the mass of a closed Universe change over time?

Yes, the mass of a closed Universe can change over time due to the expansion or contraction of the Universe, as well as the addition or removal of matter and energy.

Why is calculating the mass of a closed Universe important in cosmology?

Calculating the mass of a closed Universe is important in cosmology because it helps us understand the overall structure and evolution of the Universe, as well as the role of dark matter and dark energy in shaping its destiny.

Similar threads

Back
Top