How to Calculate the Maximum Volume of Overlapping Cylinders on a 3D Grid?

  • Thread starter dzza
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Volume
In summary, the conversation discusses the problem of computing the maximum volume enclosed by any given configuration of three vertices in a 4 x 4 x 4 grid. The vertices serve as the "middle" of circular cylinders, with the radii depending on the z-coordinate of the chosen vertices. It is suggested that the problem could be solved using calculus, taking into account the differences in radii and using the triangle formed by the three points as a basis. However, further clarification is needed on the orientation of the cylinders and the total number of vertices in the grid.
  • #1
dzza
14
0
Imagine that you are free to choose any 3 vertices from a 4 x 4 x 4 grid that has 16 equally distributed vertices, as if made up of 16 1x1x1 cubes. Now, having chosen your 3 vertices, these 3 vertices each serve as the "middle" of a circular cylinder. By middle I mean it is located at half the height of the cylinder, at the origin of the circle. Each of these cylinders' radii depend on the z coordinate of the vertice you picked. Given this info, I'd like to compute the maximum volume enclosed by any given configuration of 3 vertices. This is easy if they do not overlap, but trickier if two or even all three overlap. I'm sure I can use calculus to find the volume common to all 3 and subtract that from the sum of the three volumes. That is, if I wasn't trying to write this in c++, of which I just barely know enough to get by.

I wanted to get some comments about how I might go about designing this problem. My current thought was that each any three points will form a triangle, and I could somehow use the area of this triangle along with some sort of correction factor that accounted for the differences in radii that come from the different z coordinates to make a good estimate of the actual volume. If this idea were to lead anywhere, I'd use the area of the triangle connecting the points and the correction factor to form a cylinder whose 'middle' is the centroid of the triangle. This is an overly simplified version of the problem that I am trying to work with, but any thoughts will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Some comments: I assume that you meant to truncate each of the three cylinders at the edges of the cube (or else the volume is clearly infinite!) Also, the cylinders lack orientation: e.g. to describe a right circular cylinder you need to know i) the radius, and ii) the axis of the cylinder; you have specified only that the radius depends on the z-coordinate of it's point, and that the axis of the cylinder passes through this point (whereas it takes two points to determine a line, namely the axis)--I mean to ask is the cylinder vertical, horizontal, or other?. Also there are 4x4x4=64 verticies. Post a little more to clarify
 
  • #3
for sharing your problem and thought process! It seems like you have a good understanding of the problem and are on the right track with using calculus and the triangle formed by the three chosen vertices. One potential approach could be to calculate the volume of each individual cylinder and then use the common volume formula for three overlapping cylinders (which can be found online) to find the total volume enclosed.

Another idea could be to use the concept of integration to find the volume of the space between the three cylinders. This could involve breaking the space into smaller sections and calculating the volume using the difference in radii and the height of each section. This may be a more complex approach, but could potentially provide a more accurate estimate of the volume.

Overall, it seems like you have a solid understanding of the problem and are thinking about different ways to approach it. I would recommend continuing to explore different methods and seeing which one yields the most accurate and efficient results. Good luck!
 

FAQ: How to Calculate the Maximum Volume of Overlapping Cylinders on a 3D Grid?

How is the volume of an irregular shape estimated?

The volume of an irregular shape can be estimated by dividing it into smaller regular shapes, such as cubes or spheres, and then finding the volume of each shape and adding them together.

What tools or methods can be used to estimate a difficult volume?

Some common tools and methods used to estimate a difficult volume include geometric formulas, 3D modeling software, water displacement methods, and mathematical integration.

How accurate are volume estimations?

The accuracy of volume estimations depends on the precision and accuracy of the tools and methods used, as well as the complexity of the shape being estimated. Generally, the more precise and detailed the measurements and calculations, the more accurate the volume estimation will be.

What is the importance of estimating a difficult volume in scientific research?

Estimating a difficult volume is important in scientific research as it allows for the calculation of important parameters such as density, mass, and concentration. This information is crucial for understanding the physical properties and behaviors of the materials being studied.

Are there any limitations to estimating a difficult volume?

Yes, there are limitations to estimating a difficult volume. These include the complexity of the shape being estimated, the accuracy of the measurements and calculations, and potential errors or discrepancies in the data. It is important to consider these limitations when interpreting and using volume estimations in scientific research.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top