How to Determine Over-Amperage on Pulley Size Change?

In summary, I am having trouble pulling the required 1300 CFM at 7" SP with my VPB-808 fan (rated 4100 RPM) and Baldor, EM3611T, 3HP, rated 1760 RPM, 4.2A motor. My current configuration is using a 1.75" pulley on the fan side and a 2.5" pulley on the motor side. It seems that if I increase my pulley size any bigger, I may cause the motor to be overamped. Would it cause the same over-amperage effect if I decrease the pulley size on the fan side (to
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #37
erobz said:
https://vironintl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Viron-VPB-Series-Push-Exhaust-Blower.pdf

Use this link (That is at a different RPM than what you are claiming to be running).

According to these tables something doesn't seem correct to me, but double check.
I have not measured the actual RPM of the motor. We just ordered a manometer for this purpose. Hopefully we will receive it soon.

There is one thing I have not considered. Do I have to factor in the motor efficiency? The nameplate has a motor efficiency of 89.5%. Does that mean that the motor is not running at 1760 RPM even at max frequency, and is actually running at 1575 RPM?
 
  • #38
Haotranphotomask said:
I have not measured the actual RPM of the motor. We just ordered a manometer for this purpose. Hopefully we will receive it soon.

There is one thing I have not considered. Do I have to factor in the motor efficiency? The nameplate has a motor efficiency of 89.5%. Does that mean that the motor is not running at 1760 RPM even at max frequency, and is actually running at 1575 RPM?
You have to figure out what rpm you are running at. Purchase a hand tachometer. The rpm of an asynchronous AC motor only barely changes under normal loading ( the torque speed curve is very steep - minimal slip in that region translates to wide range of loading capacity ). It should be pretty much running at nameplate rpm.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, Lnewqban and Haotranphotomask
  • #39
Haotranphotomask said:
There is one thing I have not considered. Do I have to factor in the motor efficiency? The nameplate has a motor efficiency of 89.5%.

The nameplate motor efficiency is just the ratio of shaft output power to electrical input power at its rated load.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #40
Haotranphotomask said:
I have not measured the actual RPM of the motor. We just ordered a manometer for this purpose. Hopefully we will receive it soon.
Could it be a tachometer instead?

Remember, it is the actual rpm value of the fan what matters for evaluating its performance.
The belt could always be slipping some, specially at high torque.
 
  • Like
Likes Haotranphotomask and erobz
  • #41
Lnewqban said:
Could it be a tachometer instead?
Yeah it is the tachometer I was talking about.

Lnewqban said:
Remember, it is the actual rpm value of the fan what matters for evaluating its performance.
The belt could always be slipping some, specially at high torque.
Thank you for this information! I was not focusing on the fan RPM.
 
  • #42
Lnewqban said:
Could it be a tachometer instead?

Remember, it is the actual rpm value of the fan what matters for evaluating its performance.
The belt could always be slipping some, specially at high torque.
I was able to measure the rotation of the fan.

Motor pulley size: 5.25”
Fan Pulley size: 3.75”
Center-to-Center: 13.5”
The RPM on motor pulley: 1920 RPM
The RPM on fan pulley: 2727 RPM
The static pressure is ~6”WC, but we are only getting 1050 CFM of flow through with one fan. I was able to get ~1200CFM if I have two fans on.

Would it be because the 8" trunk is too restrictive for 1300CFM of flow? What if I increase the fan size/resheave the belt? Would the 8" trunk still be limiting how much flow I could get through?
 
  • #43
Haotranphotomask said:
I was able to measure the rotation of the fan.

Motor pulley size: 5.25”
Fan Pulley size: 3.75”
Center-to-Center: 13.5”
The RPM on motor pulley: 1920 RPM
The RPM on fan pulley: 2727 RPM
The static pressure is ~6”WC, but we are only getting 1050 CFM of flow through with one fan. I was able to get ~1200CFM if I have two fans on.

Would it be because the 8" trunk is too restrictive for 1300CFM of flow? What if I increase the fan size/resheave the belt? Would the 8" trunk still be limiting how much flow I could get through?
Your fan is turning 2727 RPM, and you are measuring 6" WC across fan inlet to outlet, and your fan is putting out 1050 CFM ( as opposed to the curves ##\approx 1700 ~\rm{CFM}##), then you have other issues, because the fan is not running on its "curve".

Are you sure you are measuring the static pressure correctly?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and Lnewqban
  • #44
erobz said:
Your fan is turning 2727 RPM, and you are measuring 6" WC across fan inlet to outlet, and you fan is putting out 1050 CFM, then you have other issues, because the fan is not running on its "curve".
Yeah when I got the measurements, I was very confused. I am thinking it is due to the 8" trunk being restrictive. I cannot figure out what the problem could potentially be.
 
  • #45
Haotranphotomask said:
Yeah when I got the measurements, I was very confused. I am thinking it is due to the 8" trunk being restrictive. I cannot figure out what the problem could potentially be.

Are you sure you are measuring the static pressure correctly? Where have you taken the measurements. A quick diagram of the fan and surrounding ductwork would be helpful.
 
  • #46
erobz said:
Are you sure you are measuring the static pressure correctly? Where have you taken the measurements. A quick diagram of the fan and surrounding ductwork would be helpful.
Fan.JPG
IMG_0387.JPG

I am measuring the SP at the red circles. The green circle is a backdraft damper. I don't think the pressure drop through that damper is significant.

There is about 20ft of 12" piping on the inlet. But the remaining 8" piping totals up to 200 ft. The inlet ports consist of 1 ft of 3"-5" pipes.
 
  • #47
Haotranphotomask said:
View attachment 318429View attachment 318428
I am measuring the SP at the red circles. The green circle is a backdraft damper. I don't think the pressure drop through that damper is significant.

There is about 20ft of 12" piping on the inlet. But the remaining 8" piping totals up to 200 ft. The inlet ports consist of 1 ft of 3"-5" pipes.
I'm confused. The inlet has 200 ft of piping. The discharge appears to have 20 ft of 12" piping?
 
  • #48
erobz said:
I'm confused. The inlet has 200 ft of piping. The discharge appears to have 20 ft of 12" piping?
Sorry for the confusion. The inlet consists of 200 ft of 8" piping, then expanding tee to 20 ft of 12" piping, and then reduce to 8" to tie into the inlet of the fans. The discharge is another 20 ft of 12" piping.
 
  • Like
Likes erobz
  • #49
Haotranphotomask said:
Sorry for the confusion. The inlet consists of 200 ft of 8" piping, then expanding tee to 20 ft of 12" piping, and then reduce to 8" to tie into the inlet of the fans. The discharge is another 20 ft of 12" piping.
What is the measured SP at the inlet port relative to atmosphere?
 
  • #50
Why have a reducer and expander back to back? Did the white painted expander come with the fan and/or did this used to be connected to an 8" duct system? You could be losing a significant amount of static pressure through that set of transitions right at the fan. See:
https://www.achrnews.com/articles/96369-minimizing-system-effect
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and erobz
  • #51
russ_watters said:
Why have a reducer and expander back to back? Did the white painted expander come with the fan and/or did this used to be connected to an 8" duct system? You could be losing a significant amount of static pressure through that set of transitions right at the fan. See:
https://www.achrnews.com/articles/96369-minimizing-system-effect
Yeah, I was going to have them back calculate the SP at the inlet.
 
  • #52
Another thing: When you are only running 1 fan. The other fan is completely isolated from the system via closing off its discharge dampers?
 
  • #53
erobz said:
What is the measured SP at the inlet port relative to atmosphere?
About -5.5" WC at the inlet and 0.5" WC at the discharge.
russ_watters said:
Why have a reducer and expander back to back? Did the white painted expander come with the fan and/or did this used to be connected to an 8" duct system? You could be losing a significant amount of static pressure through that set of transitions right at the fan. See:
https://www.achrnews.com/articles/96369-minimizing-system-effect
I am not sure I can answer that question. The fan design was like this when I started this project and the OG engineer left without much details.
erobz said:
Another thing: When you are only running 1 fan. The other fan is completely isolated from the system via closing off its discharge dampers?
Yes, the damper is closed when one fan is running.
 
  • Like
Likes erobz
  • #54
As @russ_watters pointed out the inlet conditions are not ideal. You should get new inlet bells. I'm going to estimate the SP at the actual inlet and get back to you.
 
  • #55
Haotranphotomask said:
The RPM on motor pulley: 1920 RPM
Standard four pole induction motors run 1750 to 1760 RPM at full load, and 1798 RPM at no load when running on 60 Hz power. In order for the motor to run 1920 RPM at full load, it would need to be on a VFD set at about 65 Hz. If the motor is driven by a VFD, check the operating frequency. It will be shown on a display on the VFD cabinet. If the motor is driven by 60 Hz power, then the measured RPM is wrong. And so is the measured blower RPM.
 
  • Like
Likes erobz
  • #56
Haotranphotomask said:
About -5.5" WC at the inlet and 0.5" WC at the discharge.

I am not sure I can answer that question. The fan design was like this when I started this project and the OG engineer left without much details.

Yes, the damper is closed when one fan is running.
It's hard to say for certain (I don't have access to the ASHREA duct fitting database https://www.ashrae.org/technical-resources/bookstore/duct-fitting-database). But from what I could piece together on the net; working backwards from the point of measurement to the inlet is probably at most another 0.5"WC through those transitions, flange, flexible coupling. So maybe 6.5 "WC. So that isn't saving it...It still appears to be performing off its curve.

Check the RPM's again. As @jrmichler pointed out its not running at the rated RPM, for a 4 pole induction motor. If you think its running at 1920 RPM, and it is running at 1760 RPM, that that means the fan is turning at about 2500 RPM. and if you follow that over at 1077 cfm, we expect 6.5-7" WC.

Otherwise, is it possible the fan was ever cut \trimmed?

And you have verified similar measurements for SP on both fans, running independently?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #59
erobz said:
They are measuring at the red circles. The green circles are a mechanical damper on the discharge.
Thank you very much for the correction.

That makes the situation even worse!
The air turbulence inside any duct (not a pipe in this case) is greatly increased by any backdraft damper.

The damper of the fan in stand-by automatically closes itself under the discharge pressure of the working fan.
 
  • #60
Lnewqban said:
Thank you very much for the correction.

That makes the situation even worse!
The air turbulence inside any duct (not a pipe in this case) is greatly increased by any backdraft damper.

The damper of the fan in stand-by automatically closes itself under the discharge pressure of the working fan.
Yeah, I suspect we could add another 0.5"WC from the open damper. Maybe bringing the total to 7" WC. There would still be a discrepancy. However, if something turns out to be fishy with the measured motor rpm as @jrmichler expects, then everything seems to fall into place - and the fan is operating as expected...which would be good because we could then end the free of charge remote trouble shooting!
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #61
It appears as though I underestimated the head loss from the damper.

https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/hvac-damper-pressure-loss-d_1873.html

In a 12 inch duct @ 1050 CFM, that's a damper face velocity ##\approx 3000 ~ \rm{\frac{ft}{min}}##.

According to the chart that's close to 1.5"WC loss for the damper. That would give us a total of ##\approx 6 + 0.5+1.5 = 8## "WC.

If your motor rpm is correct ( it is run off a VFD ), then it indicates the fan is performing as expected.

It's possible someone decided to overspeed the motor a bit to make up for missing the design spec (or underestimating it).

If this turns out to be the case, (probably) the most economical route is to get a larger motor and change gearing to match the desired rpm as opposed to a system redesign. You'll have to check the ROR for each option.

$$ H(1300) \approx \frac{8}{1050^2}1300^2 = 12.3~\rm{WC}$$

I'd give that a 10% safety factor...so spec the motor hp/rpm about 13" WC @ 1300 CFM.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #62
Haotranphotomask said:
I was able to measure the rotation of the fan.

Motor pulley size: 5.25”
Fan Pulley size: 3.75”
Center-to-Center: 13.5”
The RPM on motor pulley: 1920 RPM
The RPM on fan pulley: 2727 RPM
The static pressure is ~6”WC, but we are only getting 1050 CFM of flow through with one fan. I was able to get ~1200CFM if I have two fans on.

Would it be because the 8" trunk is too restrictive for 1300CFM of flow? What if I increase the fan size/resheave the belt? Would the 8" trunk still be limiting how much flow I could get through?
Yes, 8-inch round metal is not enough for that volume.
Maybe noise level should be considered if you follow the route of more input power.

Could you install additional ducts in parallel with that unfortunate 8-inch?

Time for some duct system calculations.
Please, see:
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/sizing-ducts-d_207.html
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and erobz
  • #63
Lnewqban said:
Yes, 8-inch round metal is not enough for that volume.
Maybe noise level should be considered if you follow the route of more input power.

Could you install additional ducts in parallel with that unfortunate 8-inch?

Time for some duct system calculations.
Please, see:
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/sizing-ducts-d_207.html
To me it looks like PVC (or worse CPVC) duct. There could be a sizable upfront cost with material/installation considerations if that is the case.

I think 2 motors up front cost, and annualized 2hp of additional electricity are going to win out

But as you say. Noise may dictate the system redesign expense.

In an industrial setting, I never calculated noise levels (not saying that one shouldn't - thinking back I did make a loud system once). For the most part If it was loud (it was just like everything else in the plant), you wear ear defenders\plugs! The tolerance of noise probably varies plant to plant and how much ambient noise already exist.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #64
I may have missed it (I looked). How are you measuring your actual CFM? I ask because:

1. Your blower dP is about where it should be
2. Your inlet absolute pressure is reasonable for the described plumbing at the described flow

Any chance that you're performing as expected and just have a bad flow measurement?
 

Similar threads

Motor fan pulley sizing for HVAC
Replies
20
Views
5K
Automotive How Do You Calculate Shaft RPM for Different Pulley Sizes?
Replies
8
Views
2K
How can I reduce the speed of my lift without changing its displacement?
Replies
5
Views
1K
DC Motors and Nameplate Ratings
Replies
1
Views
4K
How to determine proper motor torque
Replies
16
Views
12K
How Do I Calculate Pulley Sizes to Maintain RPM in Exhaust Fans?
Replies
2
Views
20K
Calculate Force at Air Tank Outlet Pipe: 200psi to 30psi
Replies
14
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top