How to find the value of a constant experimentally?

In summary, the conversation discusses finding the value of a constant experimentally using non-linear equations. The suggested method is to plot the experimental data and use the slope of the best-fit line to determine the value of the constant. Other methods, such as using Excel, are also mentioned but may not be as accurate. The importance of considering error and not blindly trusting computer-generated results is also emphasized.
  • #1
happyparticle
456
21
TL;DR Summary
How to linearized an equation to find the slope
Hi,
First of all, sorry if this is not the right place to post my question I was not sure where exactly to post this kind of question.

I'm wondering how can I find the value of a constant experimentally.
For instance, I have a equation ##l = AB^{4/3}##, with a set of data for ##I## and ##B##.
If the equation above was linear I could find the slope of the graph to get the value for ##A##.

However, this is not a linear equation.
I wondering if I have to linearize the equation and then find the slope to get the value for ##A##?
If so, how exactly I linearize it?

For instance an equation like ##A = BC^{2}e^{-D/C}## could be linearized by multiplying both side by ln, I think.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You could always plot I on one axis and [itex]B^{4/3}[/itex] on the other.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and Dale
  • #3
Vanadium 50 said:
You could always plot I on one axis and [itex]B^{4/3}[/itex] on the other.
Alright,
One more thing, in my case, what exactly linearized the equation means?
 
  • #4
I must reformulate my question.
I have a set of value for ##l## and ##B## which gives me a curve when I plot it and I'm confident that this is the right curve.
However, I would like to plot the theoretical equation which is ##l=AB^{3/2}## only for low value of ##B##.
I'm not sure how to do that. This is probably why my question was confusing.
I think I have to find ##A## first then plug ##A## with my values of ##B## to find ##l## ? I'm not sure if that makes sense.
 
  • #5
Here is what I would do.
Plot the experimental values of I vs B3/2. Put estimated error bars on each plotted point (I, B3/2). Draw the best straight line (yes use a ruler) through the points: the slope will equal A.
Use this value for A to create the curve over the region you desire.

If I knew more about the data I might use a different method., but you are on the right track. The error bars are a useful guide.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
  • #6
hutchphd said:
Here is what I would do.
Plot the experimental values of I vs B3/2. Put estimated error bars on each plotted point (I, B3/2). Draw the best straight line (yes use a ruler) through the points: the slope will equal A.
Use this value for A to create the curve over the region you desire.

If I knew more about the data I might use a different method., but you are on the right track. The error bars are a useful guide.
If you don't like the ruler method, use Xcel to create a table with I and B3/2, have it determine the linear regression coefficients in that table to get A. Then create a new table of I in one column and AB3/2 in the other and have it make a chart that way.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
  • #7
ohwilleke said:
If you don't like the ruler method
I prefer it when there are error "rectangles" on the data (EXCEL doesn't do that easilly as far as I know) You eyeballs do a remarkable good "RMS" fit. But I do (or at least did) love EXCEL for data. Saved me hundreds of man-hrs.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and Vanadium 50
  • #8
Yeah, I would rather hand-draw it than Excel. Hand-drawing gives you perspective, so it's a better place to start. Also, the error analysis doing this is not quite right, and Excel makes things look more certain than they actually are. After all, it came out of a computer - what could possibly be wromg?
 
  • #9
Vanadium 50 said:
After all, it came out of a computer - what could possibly be wromg?
"Garbage in, Gospel out"
 
  • Haha
Likes ohwilleke and Vanadium 50

FAQ: How to find the value of a constant experimentally?

What is the general approach to finding the value of a constant experimentally?

The general approach involves designing an experiment where the constant is a key part of the relationship between measured variables. By carefully measuring these variables and using the known theoretical relationship, the constant can be calculated. This often involves plotting data and using statistical or graphical methods to determine the constant.

How can I ensure the accuracy of my experimental measurements?

To ensure accuracy, use calibrated instruments, perform multiple trials, and average the results to minimize random errors. Also, control environmental conditions that might affect the measurements and use appropriate statistical methods to analyze the data.

What role does data plotting play in finding a constant?

Data plotting helps visualize the relationship between variables and can be used to determine the constant. For example, if the relationship is linear, plotting the data points and finding the slope or intercept of the best-fit line can yield the value of the constant. Non-linear relationships may require fitting the data to a specific model.

How do I handle systematic errors in my experiment?

Identify potential sources of systematic errors and try to eliminate or compensate for them. This could involve recalibrating equipment, using more precise instruments, or correcting for known biases. Documenting and understanding these errors is crucial for accurate determination of the constant.

Can you provide an example of finding a constant experimentally?

Sure! For example, to find the spring constant (k) in Hooke's Law (F = kx), you can measure the force (F) applied to a spring and the resulting displacement (x). By plotting F versus x, the slope of the resulting linear graph will be the spring constant k. Multiple measurements and averaging can improve accuracy.

Similar threads

Back
Top