- #1
Bill Sellers
- 3
- 0
Explanations of 2-slit interference sometimes show the interference pattern compared to a 1-slit diffraction pattern, and state that the latter represents a limit or envelope for the former. Is it correct to interpret the patterns as representing (directly or indirectly) the number of photons being detected at locations on the screen? If so, then wouldn’t this imply that fewer photons are detected in the 2-slit setup vs. 1-slit?