- #1
binbagsss
- 1,307
- 11
how to think of translations and Galilean boosts commuting intuitively
Note that this has to mean spatial translations for your statement in the OP to be true. Galilean boosts and time translations do not commute.binbagsss said:translations
meopemuk said:press accelerator pedal (this is boost)
During the acceleration itself you're not experiencing what physicists would call a 'boost'. Inertial observers are connected by 'boosts'. During acceleration you're not an inertial observer.meopemuk said:By definition, boost is a transformation that changes velocity of reference frame.
When I press accelerator pedal, velocity of my car changes. Then the inertial reference frame associated with me and my car experiences a boost.
Eugene.
meopemuk said:By definition, boost is a transformation that changes velocity of reference frame.
True, during acceleration I am not an inertial observer. But after I released the accelerator pedal, I move with a constant speed and I may regard myself as an inertial observer, which is boosted with respect to my previous state.weirdoguy said:No, boost changes inertial reference frame to a different inertial one.
From the abstract I see the Bargmann algebra is assoicated with the centrally extended Galilean algebra. Could you give, very briefly, implications of what this means compared to the question I asked which was on, what I assume can be referred to as the unextended Galilean group. thankshaushofer said:
ofc.PeterDonis said:Note that this has to mean spatial translations for your statement in the OP to be true. Galilean boosts and time translations do not commute.
A reference frame is not an object like a car that has a single trajectory. A boost is not a physical process like acceleration of an object. A boost is a mapping or transformation from one reference frame to another.meopemuk said:True, during acceleration I am not an inertial observer. But after I released the accelerator pedal, I move with a constant speed and I may regard myself as an inertial observer, which is boosted with respect to my previous state.
I agree that this is not a perfect analogy for boost, but not a bad one if we disregard the (short) time during which I am stepping on the gas pedal.
Perhaps, a better analogy would be to jump (mentally) to another car that passes nearby.
Eugene.