MHB How to Map a Range to -1 to 1 in Relationships?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SLSCoder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationships
AI Thread Summary
To map a range defined by two numbers, high and low, to the interval of -1 to 1, the transformation formula is given as \(\tilde{x} = -1 + 2 \frac{x - low}{high - low}\). This equation assumes that the variable \(x\) lies between the low and high values. The transformation effectively scales the variable so that the low value corresponds to -1 and the high value corresponds to 1. The discussion confirms the correctness of the formula and seeks clarification on its implementation in code. The final equation is validated with the appropriate variable names.
SLSCoder
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a number, the high, that could be positive, negative or zero and can be a fraction.
I have another number, the low, that could also be positive, negative or zero and can be a fraction.
I have another number, the variable that is between the high and the low.

It is safe to say that the high is greater than the low.
I need to represent the high as 1 and the low as -1.
Then I need to determine what the variable value would be (between 1 and -1).

How can I solve this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$$\text{So you are mapping the interval $[low,~high]$ to the interval $[-1,1]$}\\
\text{Let $x$ be your variable that you want to transform, and $\tilde{x}$ be it's new value}\\
\text{It's assumed that $low \leq x \leq high$}\\~\\
\tilde{x} = -1 + 2\dfrac{x-low}{high - low},~ -1 \leq \tilde{x} \leq 1$$
 
Thank you!
I need to write this function in code (software).
My math is pretty bad so I just want to clarify that the equation looks like this?

This is correct: low ≤ x ≤ high

-1 + 2 * ((X - lo) / (hi - lo));

I sure appreciate your help.
 
looks good if your variables are now called hi and lo
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top