How to merge beams with POVMs?

  • Thread starter naima
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Beams
In summary, when in a stern-gerlach experiment the electrons are not detected, the two beams can merge behind. This is easy to do as the up> and down> states are orthogonal. In a POVM setup with 3 output channels, F1, F2, and F3, the operators sum to Id but do not have to be orthogonal. There are three detectors which click with probabilities P1, P2, and P3. When replacing detectors 1 and 2 with a merger, the probabilities have to be added. However, in theory, the specific process of merging beams may vary depending on the experimental setup. In practice, it does not make much difference how the situation is modeled, as decoherence
  • #1
naima
Gold Member
938
54
When in a stern-gerlach electrons are not detected the two beams can merge behind. We just have to add the amplitudes.
this is easy because up> and down> are orthogonal.
Suppose that we have a POVM setup with 3 output channels: F1 F2 and F3 as operators. They sum to Id but have not to be orthogonal.
there are three detectors which click with probabilities P1 P2 and P3 (##Pi = Tr(\rho Fi)##)
Suppose now that we replace detectors 1 and 2 by a merger Have we to add F1 and F2? (add probabilities).
With ##F1 = M1^\dagger M1## and ##F2 = M2^\dagger M2## we would get
##M1^\dagger M1 + M2^\dagger M2## and not ##(M1+M)^\dagger(M+M)##
This is not the same. so what is the rule when we merge beams?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In theory, it depends on the experimental setup. If you just split the beam and remerge it, you have a coherent process and add amplitudes. If you prepare two different ensembles ρ1 and ρ2 and mix them, you have an incoherent process and add probabilities.

In practice, I don't think it makes much difference how you model the situation. Decoherence in the first process makes the outcome look identical to the second.
 
  • #3
Man'ko gave https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222549915_Inner_composition_law_of_pure_states_as_a_purification_of_impure_states .
There is a composition law for density matrices.
look at (eq 17)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related to How to merge beams with POVMs?

1. How do you define a beam and a POVM?

A beam is a collection of particles or waves traveling in the same direction, while a POVM (Positive Operator Valued Measure) is a mathematical tool used to describe the measurement outcomes of a quantum system.

2. Why is it important to merge beams with POVMs?

Merging beams with POVMs allows us to accurately measure and analyze the quantum state of a system, which is essential for understanding and manipulating quantum phenomena.

3. What are the challenges in merging beams with POVMs?

One of the main challenges is ensuring that the beams and POVMs are compatible and can be combined without altering the properties of either. This requires careful design and calibration of the experimental setup.

4. Can beams and POVMs be merged in any quantum system?

While the principles of merging beams with POVMs apply to any quantum system, the specific methods and techniques may vary depending on the system. Different types of beams and POVMs may also require different approaches for merging.

5. Are there any applications for merging beams with POVMs?

Yes, there are many applications for merging beams with POVMs in various fields such as quantum computing, quantum communication, and quantum sensing. It allows for precise control and measurement of quantum systems, which can lead to advancements in technology and scientific understanding.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
878
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top