How to obtain moment bound from the importance sampling identity?

  • I
  • Thread starter WMDhamnekar
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Probability
In summary, the moment bound can be obtained from the importance sampling identity by leveraging the relationship between the expected value of a function under one probability distribution and its representation under another distribution. By carefully choosing a proposal distribution and applying Jensen's inequality, one can derive bounds on moments by analyzing the variance of the importance weights, ensuring that the estimates remain stable and accurate even with finite samples. This approach is crucial for improving the efficiency of simulations and statistical inference in various applications.
  • #1
WMDhamnekar
MHB
381
28
TL;DR Summary
Let ##m(t) =E[X^t]## The moment bound states that for a > 0, ##P\{ X \geq a \}\leq m(t)a^{-t} \forall t > 0##. How would you prove this result using importance sampling identity?
Let ##X## be a non-negative random variable and let a > 0. We want to bound the probability ##P\{X \geq a\}## in terms of the moments of X.
- Define a function ##h(x) = \mathbb{1}\{x \geq a\}##, where ##\mathbb{1}\{\cdot\}## is the indicator function that returns 1 if the argument is true and 0 otherwise. Then, we have ##P\{X \geq a\} = E_f[h(X)]##, where ##E_f## denotes the expected value with respect to the pdf of X.
- Choose another random variable Y with probability density function (pdf) ##f_Y(y)## such that ##f_Y(y) > 0## whenever ##f_X(y) > 0##, where ##f_X(x)## is the pdf of X. This is called the importance distribution. Define the importance weight as ##w(x) = f_X(x)/f_Y(x)##.
- Apply the importance sampling identity to write ##E_f[h(X)] = E_g\left[\frac{h(Y)w(Y)}{g(Y)}\right]## where the expectation on the right-hand side is taken with respect to Y.
Now how to proceed further? Can we use here Jensen's Inequality?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
My Answer:
The importance sampling identity states that for any measurable function f and random variable X with probability density function p, the expected value of f(X) can be expressed as:

##E[f(X)] = \int f(x) p(x) dx = \int f(x) \frac{p(x)}{q(x)} q(x) dx,##

where q is another probability density function that we choose. This identity allows us to estimate E[f(X)] by sampling from q instead of p.

Now, let's move on to proving the moment bound using the importance sampling identity. We want to show that for any positive number a and any positive exponent t, the probability that ##X^t## is greater than or equal to ##a^t## is bounded by ##m(t) \cdot a^{-t}##.

To do this, we will choose the function ##f(x) = \mathbb{I}(x \geq a)##, where ##\mathbb{I}## is the indicator function that takes the value 1 if the condition inside the parentheses is true, and 0 otherwise. By applying the importance sampling identity to ##f(x^t)##, we have:

##E[f(X^t)] = \int \mathbb{I}(x^t \geq a^t) \frac{p(x^t)}{q(x^t)} q(x^t) dx^t.##

Now, notice that when ##x^t \geq a^t##, the indicator function takes the value 1, and 0 otherwise. Therefore, we can rewrite the above expression as:

##E[f(X^t)] = \int \mathbb{I}(x^t \geq a^t) \frac{p(x^t)}{q(x^t)} q(x^t) dx^t = \int_{x^t \geq a^t} \frac{p(x^t)}{q(x^t)} q(x^t) dx^t.##

Now, let's focus on the integral ##\int_{x^t \geq a^t} \frac{p(x^t)}{q(x^t)} q(x^t) dx^t##. We can rewrite this integral as the expectation of the random variable ##\frac{p(X^t)}{q(X^t)} \cdot q(X^t)##, where ##X^t## is sampled from the distribution q. Therefore, we have:

##E[f(X^t)]=\int_{x^t \geq a^t} \frac{p(x^t)}{q(x^t)} q(x^t) dx^t = E\left[\frac{p(X^t)}{q(X^t)} \cdot q(X^t)\right].##

Now, since ##\frac{p(X^t)}{q(X^t)} \cdot q(X^t)## is a non-negative random variable, we can apply Markov's inequality, which states that for any non-negative random variable Y and any positive constant c, we have ##P\{Y \geq c\} \leq \frac{E[Y]}{c}##. Applying Markov's inequality to our expression, we get:

##P\left\{\frac{p(X^t)}{q(X^t)} \cdot q(X^t) \geq {a^t}\right\} \leq \frac{E\left[\frac{p(X^t)}{q(X^t)} \cdot q(X^t)\right]}{a^t} =m(t) {a^{-t}}.##

But notice that the event ##\left\{\frac{p(X^t)}{q(X^t)} \cdot q(X^t) \geq {a^t}\right\}## is equivalent to the event ##\left\{X^t \geq a^t\right\}##. Therefore, we have:

##P\left\{X^t \geq a^t\right\} \leq {m(t)}{a^{-t}}.##

And there you have it! We have successfully proved the moment bound using the importance sampling identity. This result tells us that for any positive number a and any positive exponent t, the probability that ##X^t## is greater than or equal to ##a^t## is bounded by ##m(t) \cdot a^{-t}##.

I think now this answer seems to look correct. Isn't it?
 

FAQ: How to obtain moment bound from the importance sampling identity?

What is the importance sampling identity?

The importance sampling identity is a technique used in statistical estimation and Monte Carlo simulations to estimate properties of a particular distribution while sampling from a different distribution. It involves weighting the sampled values by the ratio of the target distribution's probability density to the sampling distribution's probability density.

How can I use the importance sampling identity to obtain moment bounds?

To obtain moment bounds using the importance sampling identity, you can leverage the fact that the expected value of a function under one distribution can be expressed as a weighted average of the function under a different distribution. By carefully choosing the sampling distribution and ensuring that the weights are well-behaved, you can derive bounds on the moments of the target distribution.

What are the key steps in deriving moment bounds from the importance sampling identity?

The key steps include: (1) identifying the target distribution and the moment you wish to bound, (2) selecting an appropriate sampling distribution, (3) computing the weights as the ratio of the target distribution's density to the sampling distribution's density, (4) ensuring the weights are finite and manageable, and (5) using the weighted samples to estimate and bound the desired moment.

What are common challenges in obtaining moment bounds using importance sampling?

Common challenges include selecting an appropriate sampling distribution that ensures the weights are not too large, which can lead to high variance in the estimates. Additionally, ensuring that the sampling distribution covers the support of the target distribution adequately is crucial to avoid biased estimates.

Can you provide an example of obtaining a moment bound using the importance sampling identity?

Sure! Suppose you want to estimate the second moment (variance) of a target distribution \( f(x) \). You choose a sampling distribution \( g(x) \). For each sample \( x_i \) drawn from \( g(x) \), you compute the weight \( w_i = \frac{f(x_i)}{g(x_i)} \). The importance sampling estimate of the second moment is given by \( \hat{E}[X^2] = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^N w_i x_i^2 \). To bound this moment, you analyze the properties of the weights \( w_i \) and ensure they do not introduce excessive variance.

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
961
Replies
1
Views
936
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
900
Replies
1
Views
757
Replies
1
Views
894
Back
Top