How to prove ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## in curved space using the given equation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the validity of the identity involving the Levi-Civita tensor and the metric tensor in curved space, questioning whether it holds true as it does in flat space. Participants seek to prove that the equation involving the covariant derivatives of vectors, specifically that the expression leads to the conclusion that V_{ai;j} equals V_{aj;i}. Clarification is requested regarding the definitions of the Levi-Civita tensor and the metric tensor, including their properties and the implications of raising or lowering indices. The conversation emphasizes the need for a rigorous approach to demonstrate the equality rather than assuming it as a solution. Overall, the thread focuses on the mathematical intricacies of proving tensor identities in the context of curved geometry.
user1139
Messages
71
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
See below.
Relevant Equations
See below.
Question ##1##.

Consider the following identity

\begin{equation}
\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}\epsilon_{i}^{\phantom{i}lm}=h^{jl}h^{m}_{\phantom{m}k}-h^{jm}h^{l}_{\phantom{l}k}
\end{equation}

which we know holds in flat space. Does this identity still hold in curved space? and if so, how does one go about proving it?

Question ##2##.

Consider the following

\begin{equation}
\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}\left(V_{ai;j}-V_{aj;i}\right)=0.
\end{equation}

As ##\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}## is not arbitrary, one cannot simply conclude that ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}##. Yet, I want to show that one can get ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## from the above equation. Is there a way to do that rather than just saying that ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## is a possible solution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please define your notation. What are ##\epsilon## and ##h##?
 
##\epsilon_{ijk}## is the Levi-Civita tensor and ##h_{ij}## is the metric tensor in 3-space.
 
Are you referring to the object with componens ##\pm 1## an 0 (which is not a tensor but a tensor density - and if so what do you mean by raising/lowering its indices) or to the actual tensor with components ##\pm 1## and 0 in an orthonormal coordinate system?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top