- #1
user1139
- 72
- 8
- Homework Statement
- See below.
- Relevant Equations
- See below.
Question ##1##.
Consider the following identity
\begin{equation}
\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}\epsilon_{i}^{\phantom{i}lm}=h^{jl}h^{m}_{\phantom{m}k}-h^{jm}h^{l}_{\phantom{l}k}
\end{equation}
which we know holds in flat space. Does this identity still hold in curved space? and if so, how does one go about proving it?
Question ##2##.
Consider the following
\begin{equation}
\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}\left(V_{ai;j}-V_{aj;i}\right)=0.
\end{equation}
As ##\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}## is not arbitrary, one cannot simply conclude that ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}##. Yet, I want to show that one can get ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## from the above equation. Is there a way to do that rather than just saying that ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## is a possible solution?
Consider the following identity
\begin{equation}
\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}\epsilon_{i}^{\phantom{i}lm}=h^{jl}h^{m}_{\phantom{m}k}-h^{jm}h^{l}_{\phantom{l}k}
\end{equation}
which we know holds in flat space. Does this identity still hold in curved space? and if so, how does one go about proving it?
Question ##2##.
Consider the following
\begin{equation}
\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}\left(V_{ai;j}-V_{aj;i}\right)=0.
\end{equation}
As ##\epsilon^{ij}_{\phantom{ij}k}## is not arbitrary, one cannot simply conclude that ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}##. Yet, I want to show that one can get ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## from the above equation. Is there a way to do that rather than just saying that ##V_{ai;j}=V_{aj;i}## is a possible solution?