How to read review book or paper

In summary: As has been said by the people ahead of me, do not assume that just because you were given so many things to read, that those are the only things you have to read. You should expect that you will need to dig out other things to be able to understand the sources that you were originally given.See Part XI in "So You Want To Be A Physicist". You should also see if other graduate students would be willing to help you out in understanding it, but this is not the most ideal situation since those students may have to deal with their own understanding of something else.If you want to contribute to the field, you will need to understand the basics.
  • #1
knightq
23
0
Hi everyone, I have a very general question about how to read a review book or paper? My
tutor want to me read the book of deGennes and Tinkhan to start learning superconductor. Although I can unserstand the main features and even calculation,but i still can't "understand" BCS theory, I don't know whether i need to refer to the original papers. Actually this is a problem confusing me long time. Whenever I read some review paper or monography ,there are always something I can't understand, i don't know whether this is common or normal?say those things just want to give some progress in the field , you need to go to literature for complete undestanding.
Hope someone experienced can help me! Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's totally normal. The only way I have to 'completely' understand something is to either work through the calculation or do the measurement/experiment myself.
 
  • #3
I double Andy's post. Quite often, reading new papers/books is strongly connected with reading other sources as well. If you are lucky, these sources are cited. Sometimes, the author(s) consider the matter as generally known although it isn't and then the true battle starts :D

Once refereeing a paper I had to go through other ~5 papers as well. This improved my knowledge of the actual state of the art and revealed the paper of interest to be close to plagiarism...
 
  • #4
knightq said:
Hi everyone, I have a very general question about how to read a review book or paper? My
tutor want to me read the book of deGennes and Tinkhan to start learning superconductor. Although I can unserstand the main features and even calculation,but i still can't "understand" BCS theory, I don't know whether i need to refer to the original papers. Actually this is a problem confusing me long time. Whenever I read some review paper or monography ,there are always something I can't understand, i don't know whether this is common or normal?say those things just want to give some progress in the field , you need to go to literature for complete undestanding.
Hope someone experienced can help me! Thank you

I'm guessing that you mean "Tinkham".

As has been said by the people ahead of me, do not assume that just because you were given so many things to read, that those are the only things you have to read. You should expect that you will need to dig out other things to be able to understand the sources that you were originally given. See Part XI in "So You Want To Be A Physicist".

You should also see if other graduate students would be willing to help you out in understanding it, but this is not the most ideal situation since those students may have to deal with their own understanding of something else.

Zz.
 
  • #5
ZapperZ reminded me chapter 4 "Learning to study", section "Study" on page 69 in Paul Halmos' book "I want to be a mathematician". I glowingly recommend it (and the whole book). It's very motivating.
 
  • #6
ZapperZ said:
I'm guessing that you mean "Tinkham".

As has been said by the people ahead of me, do not assume that just because you were given so many things to read, that those are the only things you have to read. You should expect that you will need to dig out other things to be able to understand the sources that you were originally given. See Part XI in "So You Want To Be A Physicist".

You should also see if other graduate students would be willing to help you out in understanding it, but this is not the most ideal situation since those students may have to deal with their own understanding of something else.

Zz.
Thanks ZapperZ, I think maybe i don't expose my problem clearly.Actually I don't know to what degree i should stop when i read the book of Tinkham or De gennes.Do I just need to know the main idea and features or I must understant superconductor deeply?Take the BSC theory Superconductor as example, I know that the groud state is unstabe against cooper pair,I know we calculate the ground state by finding minimum, then go to finite temperature,calculating thermo quanlity...But I still think I am not really understand something, say what is actually the quas-particles and the energy gap mean? DO I need understand this when first read? If not, even if know the current hot topics, how could I do some real contribution? I really need you help.Thank you
 

FAQ: How to read review book or paper

How do I choose a review book or paper to read?

To choose a review book or paper, you should first determine your area of interest or the topic you want to learn more about. Then, search for reviews or papers related to that topic in reputable journals or websites. You can also ask for recommendations from colleagues or experts in the field.

How do I approach reading a review book or paper?

Start by skimming through the introduction and conclusion to get an overview of the main points and arguments. Then, read the abstract to understand the purpose and scope of the review. Next, read the headings and subheadings to identify the key topics and sections. Finally, read the main body of the review, taking notes as you go along.

How do I critically analyze a review book or paper?

To critically analyze a review book or paper, you should consider the author's credentials and the publication's credibility. Then, evaluate the methodology and data used in the review. Look for any biases or limitations in the arguments presented. Finally, compare the review with other sources to determine its significance and contribution to the field.

What should I look for when reading a review book or paper?

When reading a review book or paper, pay attention to the author's main arguments and supporting evidence. Look for any gaps in the literature that the review addresses. Consider the relevance and applicability of the review to your own research or interests. Also, take note of any new ideas or perspectives presented in the review.

How do I take effective notes while reading a review book or paper?

To take effective notes while reading a review book or paper, use a structured approach such as the Cornell method or the SQ3R method. Write down key points, definitions, and important data or statistics. Use your own words to summarize the main ideas. Also, make note of any questions or areas that require further research.

Similar threads

Studying Key Elements to Consider When Reading Scientific Papers for Researchers
Replies
6
Views
1K
Acquiring enough discipline to read a book properly
Replies
10
Views
2K
Other Question about the number of authors on a paper and how this....
Replies
4
Views
1K
Other Where and how can I submit my first paper? (Not an Expert)
Replies
5
Views
1K
How do you guys read a textbook?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Looking for learning resources for Computer Operating Systems
Replies
4
Views
2K
Studying How does one read a Physics book effectively?
Replies
19
Views
4K
Other Effective Problem Solving: Balancing Necessary Literature with Time Management
Replies
15
Views
1K
How Do I Publish a Theoretical Paper in Psychology and Neuroscience?
Replies
12
Views
3K
How to Read and Understand PhD Papers in Math/Physics
Replies
10
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top