How to Show Partial Derivative ∂z/∂x for Implicit Functions?

In summary, to show that ∂z/∂x = -(∂F/∂x)/(∂F/∂z), you can use the Implicit Function Theorem and take the partial derivative with respect to x of F(x, y, f(x, y)) = 0, using the chain rule to simplify the equation and show the desired result.
  • #1
brendan
65
0

Homework Statement



Assume the F(x,y,z) = 0 defines z implicitly as a function of x anf y. Show that

Homework Equations



∂z/∂x = -(∂F/∂x)/(∂F/∂z)



The Attempt at a Solution


I know this question is asking about the Implicit function theorem

So I start with F(x,y,z) =0

define it for z = F(x,y)

gives F(x,y,f(x,y))=0.

My problem is where to start to show that F(x,y,f(x,y)=0 shows ∂z/∂x = -(∂F/∂x)/(∂F/∂z)

How do I show the partial derivative ∂z/∂x of F(x,y,f(x,y)) ?
regards
Brendan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
brendan said:

Homework Statement



Assume the F(x,y,z) = 0 defines z implicitly as a function of x anf y. Show that

Homework Equations



∂z/∂x = -(∂F/∂x)/(∂F/∂z)



The Attempt at a Solution


I know this question is asking about the Implicit function theorem

So I start with F(x,y,z) =0

define it for z = F(x,y)

gives F(x,y,f(x,y))=0.

My problem is where to start to show that F(x,y,f(x,y)=0 shows ∂z/∂x = -(∂F/∂x)/(∂F/∂z)

How do I show the partial derivative ∂z/∂x of F(x,y,f(x,y)) ?
regards
Brendan

F(x, y, f(x, y)) = 0, so, taking the partial with respect to x of both sides, and using the chain rule, you get:
[tex]\frac{\partial F}{\partial x} \frac{\partial x}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}\frac{\partial y}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial z}\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} = 0[/tex]

After you simplify the left side above ([itex]\partial x/\partial x[/itex] is 1, and since x and y are independent variables in this problem, [itex]\partial y/\partial x[/itex] is 0), it's easy to show what you're asked to show.
 

FAQ: How to Show Partial Derivative ∂z/∂x for Implicit Functions?

What is the Implicit Function Theorem?

The Implicit Function Theorem is a fundamental mathematical tool used in multivariable calculus and differential equations. It states that under certain conditions, a system of equations can be implicitly defined by one of its variables as a function of the others.

What are the conditions for the Implicit Function Theorem to hold?

The conditions for the Implicit Function Theorem to hold are: the system of equations must be continuously differentiable, the number of equations must be equal to the number of variables, and the Jacobian matrix of the system must have full rank at the point of interest.

How is the Implicit Function Theorem used in real-world applications?

The Implicit Function Theorem has many real-world applications, such as in physics, engineering, economics, and biology. It can be used to solve optimization problems, model complex systems, and analyze relationships between variables in a system.

What is the difference between the Implicit Function Theorem and the Inverse Function Theorem?

The Implicit Function Theorem deals with implicit functions, where one variable is defined implicitly in terms of the others, while the Inverse Function Theorem deals with explicit functions, where one variable is defined explicitly in terms of the others. Additionally, the Inverse Function Theorem has stricter conditions for its applicability.

Are there any limitations to the Implicit Function Theorem?

Yes, there are limitations to the Implicit Function Theorem. It cannot be used when the system of equations is not continuously differentiable, when the number of equations is not equal to the number of variables, or when the Jacobian matrix does not have full rank at the point of interest. In such cases, other methods must be used to solve the problem.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
789
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top