How to show that this expression with tensors reduces to zero?

In summary, the problem reduces to proving that the following expression reduces to zero:$$\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial x'^a}{\partial x^e}\frac{\partial x'^d}{\partial x^h}g^{eh}g_{hg}\left(\frac{\partial^2 x^h}{\partial x'^c\,\partial x'^d}\frac{\partial x^g}{\partial x'^b}-\frac{\partial x^h}{\partial x'^b}\frac{\partial^2 x^g}{\partial x'^c\,\partial x'^d} \right )$$However, I couldn't
  • #1
phyTens
6
1
Homework Statement
Following a book "Introducing Einstein's Relativity" by Ray d'Inverno, I came across this problem (6.16):
Show directly that $$\Gamma^a_{bc}=\frac{1}{2}g^{ad}(\partial_b g_{dc}+\partial_c g_{db}-\partial_d g_{bc})$$ transforms like a connection.
Relevant Equations
The definition of ##\Gamma^a_{bc}## given above, and the usual rules for transforming tensors, i. e. $$g'^{ab}=\frac{\partial x'^a}{\partial x^c}\frac{\partial x'^b}{\partial x^d}g^{cd}$$

A useful result is also
$$\partial'_b g'_{dc}=\frac{\partial x^e}{\partial x'^b} \frac{\partial x^f}{\partial x'^c} \frac{\partial x^g}{\partial x'^d}\partial_e g_{gf}+\frac{\partial x^e}{\partial x'^b}\frac{\partial}{\partial x^e}\left (\frac{\partial x^g}{\partial x'^d}\frac{\partial x^f}{\partial x'^c}\right ) g_{gf}$$
I simply just wrote down the definition of ##\Gamma'^a_{bc}##, and inserted the transformations of ##g'^{ad}##, ##g'_{dc,b}##, and the like terms. After some rearranging and cancelling out,

$$\Gamma'^a_{bc}=\frac{\partial x'^a}{\partial x^e}\frac{\partial x^f}{\partial x'^b}\frac{\partial x^g}{\partial x'^c}\Gamma^e_{fg}+\frac{\partial x'^a}{\partial x^e}\frac{\partial^2 x^e}{\partial x'^b\,\partial x'^c}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial x'^a}{\partial x^e}\frac{\partial x'^d}{\partial x^h}g^{eh}g_{hg}\left(\frac{\partial^2 x^h}{\partial x'^c\,\partial x'^d}\frac{\partial x^g}{\partial x'^b}-\frac{\partial x^h}{\partial x'^b}\frac{\partial^2 x^g}{\partial x'^c\,\partial x'^d} \right )$$

The first two terms correspond to the usual transformation law for connections, hence the third term should vanish. If my calculations until this point are correct, the original problem reduces to proving that the following expression reduces to zero:
$$\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial x'^a}{\partial x^e}\frac{\partial x'^d}{\partial x^h}g^{eh}g_{hg}\left(\frac{\partial^2 x^h}{\partial x'^c\,\partial x'^d}\frac{\partial x^g}{\partial x'^b}-\frac{\partial x^h}{\partial x'^b}\frac{\partial^2 x^g}{\partial x'^c\,\partial x'^d} \right )$$

However, I couldn't show this, despite making lots of attempts. One of more promising attempts is swapping the dummy indices ##g## and ##h## in the second term, and arriving at
$$\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial x'^a}{\partial x^e}\frac{\partial x^g}{\partial x'^b}\frac{\partial^2 x^h}{\partial x'^c\, \partial x'^d}\left( \frac{\partial x'^d}{\partial x^h}g^{eh}-\frac{\partial x'^d}{\partial x^g}g^{eg}\right )$$
which would have to be proved to be equal to zero.

Unfortunately, I only know the basics of tensors, and don't know how such equation could be proved. As such, I am kindly asking you to post some insight on how such a problem could be tackled. Of course, I have almost certainly already made some errors, and I would be happy if you'd pointed that out as well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Use the fact that the metric is symmetric.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #3
I used this fact to derive the last expression in the post, but I haven't been able to go much further. Could you be more specific of where to apply this fact?
 
  • #4
In the last expression, note that ##g## and ##h## are dummy indices, so the two terms in the parentheses are equal.

Your last bit of work wasn't necessary though. In the earlier line, you had this factor
$$\left(\frac{\partial x^g}{\partial x'^b}\frac{\partial^2 x^h}{\partial x'^c\,\partial x'^d}-\frac{\partial x^h}{\partial x'^b}\frac{\partial^2 x^g}{\partial x'^c\,\partial x'^d} \right ),$$ which I rearranged slightly to make its antisymmetry with respect to the indices ##g## and ##h## obvious. Since your multiplying it by ##g_{hg}##, which is symmetric, the product will vanish.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #5
vela said:
Since your multiplying it by ghg, which is symmetric, the product will vanish.
Oh, thank you!

vela said:
In the last expression, note that g and h are dummy indices, so the two terms in the parentheses are equal.
I really wanted to use this fact, but I was worried because ##g## and ##h## also show up in the factor before the difference as well. Is this not a problem when cancelling out the terms in the difference?
 
  • #6
  • Like
Likes topsquark and phyTens
  • #7

FAQ: How to show that this expression with tensors reduces to zero?

How do I check if a tensor expression is identically zero?

To check if a tensor expression is identically zero, you can simplify the expression using the symmetries and properties of the tensors involved. This includes using the metric tensor to raise and lower indices, applying the Kronecker delta, and employing any known identities (such as the Bianchi identity for the Riemann tensor). If the simplified form of the expression is zero for all possible values of the indices, then the tensor expression is identically zero.

What role do symmetries play in reducing tensor expressions to zero?

Symmetries play a crucial role in simplifying tensor expressions. For instance, if a tensor is symmetric or antisymmetric with respect to some of its indices, this can lead to cancellations when combined with other tensors. Recognizing these symmetries can help you identify terms that cancel out, thereby reducing the expression to zero.

How can I use the metric tensor to simplify tensor expressions?

The metric tensor can be used to raise and lower indices, which can simplify the expression by reducing the number of free indices or by converting covariant indices to contravariant indices (or vice versa). This can sometimes reveal that terms cancel each other out, leading to a reduction of the expression to zero.

Are there specific tensor identities that can help show an expression is zero?

Yes, there are several tensor identities that can be very useful. For example, the Bianchi identities for the Riemann tensor, the Ricci identity, and the properties of the Levi-Civita symbol can often be applied to simplify expressions. Recognizing and applying these identities can help in proving that a tensor expression reduces to zero.

How do I handle contracted indices in tensor expressions?

When dealing with contracted indices, it is important to carefully follow the rules of tensor contraction. This involves summing over repeated indices, which can simplify the expression. You should also look for opportunities to use the Kronecker delta to further reduce the expression. Proper handling of contracted indices often reveals simplifications that can lead to the expression reducing to zero.

Back
Top