How to Solve a Differential Equation Using Laplace Transforms?

In summary: So for my particular case: F(s) = 1 / s^2 --> f(t) = tand F(s+a) = 1 / (s+3)^2 --> f(t) = exp(-3*t)*t ?Correct! In summary, the given problem is solved using Laplace transforms by applying the shift property and the frequency shift theorem. The inverse Laplace transform of 1/(s+3)^2 is 1/(s+3)^2 and the inverse Laplace transform of 1/s^2 is t. By multiplying the inverse transform of 1/(s+3)^2 by e^(-3t), we get the final solution of exp(-3
  • #1
Saladsamurai
3,020
7

Homework Statement



Given:

dx/dt + 3*x = exp(-3*t) and all initial conditions are zero.

Homework Equations


Laplace

The Attempt at a Solution



L[dx/dt + 3*x = exp(-3*t)]

s*X(s) + 3*X(s) = 1 / (s + 3)

X(s) = 1 / (s + 3)^2

So here is where I get mixed up. For some reason, I thought I was supposed to use a partial fraction expansion here. But those of you who know better will probably get a good chuckle out of hearing about how I did do the partial fraction expansion only to re-discover that

X(s) = 1 / (s + 3)^2

So...2 questions:

1) Do you know why I thought I needed a PFE?

2) I have a list of Laplaces and their inverses. 1 / (s + a)^n is NOT one of them.

1 / (s + a) IS one of them.

I presume I am supposed to use this rule in conjunction with some other rule to find the inverse Laplace of 1 / (s + a)^n .
Can I get a hint on how to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you had

X(s)=1/s2, you can easily get x(t)

So you'd need to apply the shift property.

You probably thought 1/(s+3)(s+3) would have given you something simpler, but it was already in its simplest form.:-p Don't worry, I've done that exacts same thing.
 
  • #3
I will have to Google the "shift theory." This is for a Controls class, so the treatment of the mathematics is really brief and incomplete. So...I'll be back in a moment.

EDIT:So the shift theory is just

L-1[F(s − a)] = exp(at)*f(t)

I am not too sure how to use this. This is going to take a while :redface:Okay. I am looking at one of my old texts. I have that:

[tex]L[t*u(t)] = \frac{1}{s^2}[/tex]

where u(t) is the unit step function. What does that really mean? Is that just a fancy name for '1' ?

I also have the Frequency Shift Theorem :

[tex]L[e^{-at}f(t)] = F(s + a)[/tex]

so...
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Saladsamurai said:
So the shift theory is just

L-1[F(s − a)] = exp(at)*f(t)

I am not too sure how to use this. This is going to take a while :redface:

Say you need to get

[tex]L^{-1} \left( \frac{3}{(s-1)^2+9} \right)[/tex]

You easily know that


[tex]L^{-1}\left( \frac{3}{s^2+9} \right)=sin3t[/tex]

So to get the require inverse transform, you need to shift the 's' to 's-1', and to do this you multiply the usual transform by e1t.
 
  • #5
rock.freak667 said:
Say you need to get

[tex]L^{-1} \left( \frac{3}{(s-1)^2+9} \right)[/tex]

You easily know that[tex]L^{-1}\left( \frac{3}{s^2+9} \right)=sin3t[/tex]

So to get the require inverse transform, you need to shift the 's' to 's-1', and to do this you multiply the usual transform by e1t.
Hmmm...so it's simply

[tex]L^{-1} \left( \frac{3}{(s-1)^2+9} \right) = e^t*\sin(3t)[/tex]

?
 
  • #6
So for my particular case:

F(s) = 1 / s^2 --> f(t) = t

and

F(s+a) = 1 / (s+3)^2 --> f(t) = exp(-3*t)*t

?
 
  • #7
Saladsamurai said:
Hmmm...so it's simply

[tex]L^{-1} \left( \frac{3}{(s-1)^2+9} \right) = e^t*\sin(3t)[/tex]

?

Yep, the F(s-a) is your 3/((s-1)2+9), your f(t)=sin(3t) and your shift is -1, so it is et
 

FAQ: How to Solve a Differential Equation Using Laplace Transforms?

What is Laplace transform and how is it used to solve differential equations?

The Laplace transform is a mathematical operation that converts a differential equation from the time domain to the frequency domain. This allows us to solve the equation using algebraic methods instead of traditional calculus methods.

Can all types of differential equations be solved using Laplace transform?

No, not all differential equations can be solved using Laplace transform. It is most commonly used for linear, time-invariant equations with constant coefficients.

What are the advantages of using Laplace transform to solve differential equations?

Laplace transform allows us to solve differential equations that may be difficult or impossible to solve using traditional methods. It also provides a general solution that can be easily manipulated to solve for specific cases.

Are there any limitations to using Laplace transform for solving differential equations?

One limitation is that the initial conditions of the differential equation must be known. It also requires knowledge of inverse Laplace transform to convert the solution back to the time domain.

Can Laplace transform be used for systems with varying coefficients?

Yes, Laplace transform can be used for systems with varying coefficients, but it requires more advanced techniques such as partial fraction decomposition or convolution to solve the resulting equations.

Back
Top