How to Solve Ampere's Circuital Law Problem with Two Currents?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shrabastee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
To solve Ampere's Circuital Law problem involving two currents, the magnetic field contributions from each wire need to be calculated separately using the formula for a long straight wire. The first step involves determining the magnetic field B1 from the wire carrying current i1, followed by calculating B2 from the wire carrying current i2, adjusting for distance. The next step is to find the net magnetic field by subtracting B2 from B1 and integrating over a specified area. A key challenge is eliminating the influence of i2 during integration, as its contribution should ideally cancel out when centered around the first wire. The solution appears straightforward, but concerns about its simplicity in a college-level context are noted.
shrabastee
18
0
1. Homework Statement
In figure. (i1 and i2 are in the same direction. And the formula for field due to straight long wire is to be used.)


2. Homework Equations

General magnetic field due to a straight long current at point P=μ0i/2πr(r=perpendicular distance between the conductor and the point P)

3. The Attempt at a Solution

I just need some hints to work on. Please help!

EDIT:

These are the steps I came up with:
1)Find B1 due to conductor carrying i1
2)Find B2 due to conductor carrying i2(taking distance as (d-r))
3)Subtract the two to get net field.
4)Integrate.

But how do I eliminate the i2 from the expression??
 

Attachments

  • sum.JPG
    sum.JPG
    29.9 KB · Views: 871
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
the net field in each points indeed has i2 in it but when u integrate over a circle centered on the first wire, the contribution from the term that has i2 in it should result in zero
 
Thanks! Are you sure my solution's right, though? Because this is a college problm and the solution I came up with seems a bit too simple. :P
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top