How to solve for x in this equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter frankivalli
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve for "x" in the given equation, it is suggested that an analytical solution may not be possible due to its complexity. The equation appears to be related to calculating the height of liquid in a cylindrical tank. Instead of seeking an exact solution, numerical methods or approximation techniques are recommended. Understanding transcendental equations is crucial for this type of problem. A numerical or graphical approach is likely the most effective way to find a solution.
frankivalli
4
0
How to solve for "x" in this equation

Thanks in advance:

here is my equation:

Area = \pir^{2} - r^{2}(arcos((r-x)/r))+(r-x))*\sqrt{2*r*x-x^{2}}
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
frankivalli said:
Thanks in advance:

here is my equation:

Area = \pir^{2} - r^{2}(arcos((r-x)/r))+(r-x))*\sqrt{2*r*x-x^{2}}
Is this related to the question you asked in another thread about the height of a liquid in a horizontal, cylindrical tank?

If so, I don't think you can solve the equation above analytically for x. The best you can do is solve it numerically using some approximation technique.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top