How to Solve IGCSE Lens q with Unspecified Distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter S2100595
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Igcse Lens
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving an IGCSE lens question where the distance from the beam to the lens is unspecified, only the beam's height is provided. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the problem's details, specifically the beam's width of 1.0 cm and the need to determine distances on the other side of the lens where the beam width changes. Clarification is provided that a sketch diagram is necessary for visualizing the problem, and participants are reminded to follow forum rules when posting. There is also a note on the importance of showing work or intentions for solving the problem to receive further assistance. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for careful reading of the problem and adherence to forum guidelines.
S2100595
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Could you please help me to figure out this question? The answer scheme says i) should be between 0 and 5.6 cm and ii) should be beyond 5.6 cm.
Relevant Equations
Not applicable
I know a sketch diagram is required for the question but they haven't specified the distance from the beam to the lens. They've just given the height of the beam. So how do I know how far I should place the object? Should the object (beam) be at infinity?
Screenshot (1877).png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Read the problem. It clearly states that the width of the beam before it reaches the lens is 1.0 cm. So the question is to find the distance(s) on the other side of the lens where the beam is less or more than 1.0 cm. Should you require additional help, our rules require that you show some work or at least how you intend to answer this question.
 
kuruman said:
Read the problem. It clearly states that the width of the beam before it reaches the lens is 1.0 cm. So the question is to find the distance(s) on the other side of the lens where the beam is less or more than 1.0 cm. Should you require additional help, our rules require that you show some work or at least how you intend to answer this question.
I have re-written how I intend to solve it
 
S2100595 said:
I have re-written how I intend to solve it
Please don't edit your original post if you wish to reply. It could be confusing and is bad form. Start a new post. If you intend to draw a sketch, then draw one and post it. Mind the statement of the problem that says "A beam of parallel light strikes a converging lens of focal length 2.8 cm." What distance do you need to be given to draw a sketch of that?
 
Alright never mind. This is my first post and I didn't realize there are so many restrictions and rules about how I can post on this forum.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Back
Top