How to think of molecular orbitals quantum mechanically

In summary: Water molecules have a specific shape corresponding to the P orbitals of the outer shell of the Oxygen atom because the electrons in the molecule are in a quantum superposition state, but the hydrogen atoms in the molecule are always "collapsing the wave function" to give the water molecule its specific shape. This "collapse of the wave function" is due to the fact that the hydrogen atoms are constantly "observing" the electron wavefunctions in the molecule. This is called "entanglement".
  • #1
Sophrosyne
128
21
The electrons in a molecule are said to be in a quantum superposition state in terms of their position/spin/momentum. But when you look at a molecule like water at a chemical level, it has a very specific shape corresponding to the P orbitals of the outer shell of the Oxygen atom. The two hydrogen atoms definitely line up at angles to match up with two of the lobes of the P orbital on the outer shell of the oxygen atom. This angular structure of the water molecule is why it has the chemical properties it has- like its electrical polarization, easy dissolving of charged ions, surface tension, etc...

But this means that those electrons can't be in a complete superposition. There is definitely a favored position they are concentrated in. So how should one think of this? Here are possibilities that I can come up with:

A) The hydrogen atoms are acting as sort of "observers" of the position of the electrons around the oxygen atom, and so they are constantly "collapsing the wave function", at least for position, to give those electrons their particular favored positions around the Oxygen nucleus (within limits of the uncertainty principle). They are basically bringing out the shape of the P orbital by being there and forcing the electrons to interact with them (ie, "observing them") in a chronic way.

B) There is no collapse of the electron wave functions. They are still in a superposition state, but there is a sort of entanglement phenomenon going on between the electrons and the atomic nuclei forming the molecule (I am not sure how this would work exactly, but I have heard it explained this way once. I wasn't able to get details).

C) Something else entirely (please explain).

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
When you "look" at the water molecule, you are not actually looking at where the electrons forming the bonds are! The location of the electrons forming the bonds between each H atom and the O atom are not precisely determined. It is spread out between the two atoms.

Zz.
 
  • #3
Sophrosyne said:
those electrons can't be in a complete superposition.
In water at room temperature, the electrons of a a water molecule will be approximately in a mixed thermal state such that the region where the electron density is significant has the shape usually drawn for a water molecule.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #4
Sophrosyne said:
The electrons in a molecule are said to be in a quantum superposition state in terms of their position/spin/momentum. But when you look at a molecule like water at a chemical level, it has a very specific shape corresponding to the P orbitals of the outer shell of the Oxygen atom...

...But this means that those electrons can't be in a complete superposition. There is definitely a favored position they are concentrated in. So how should one think of this?

In this case, I would point out that just as atomic orbitals describe the electron wavefunction for energy/angular momentum eigenstates of a single atom, molecular orbitals, are (approximate) solutions to the Schrodinger equation that describe the wavefunction of an electron in a molecule. Molecular orbitals can be described in terms of contributions from orbitals of various atoms (e.g., hybridized orbitals), and have been exceedingly useful in describing a quantum-mechanical origin of chemical bonds, but it is not entirely necessary to do this.

The Schrodinger equation for an electron in a molecule has a different hamiltonian with different potential energy due to the charges of the other nuclei among other factors, but the solutions are orbitals in their own right. Describing them as superpositions of atomic orbitals is an often convenient approximation, but is not fundamental to the actual nature of the electron wavefunction.

My best guess is that water molecules have the shape they do because that's what the lowest energy bonding molecular orbitals of the valence electrons in a water molecule look like:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_orbital_diagram
 
Last edited:
  • #5
A. Neumaier said:
In water at room temperature, the electrons of a a water molecule will be approximately in a mixed thermal state such that the region where the electron density is significant has the shape usually drawn for a water molecule.

But for electrons to have a "density", it means that you are "measuring" their location, ie, repeatedly collapsing the wave function, doesn't it? Otherwise, why would the orbital be in one particular orientation vs. another random one? You won't know where they are dense unless you are "looking". (I am putting the words in quotes because I understand these words mean something different in the quantum realm). I am thinking the hydrogen atoms here are acting as the "observers" and repeatedly collapsing the position wave function in that area.
The Schrodinger equation simply predicts where the electron locations will be most dense *when measured repeatedly*.

And has anyone heard about entanglement to explain this? I heard it once, here on this forum. But I was never able to pursue that conversation.
 
  • #6
Sophrosyne said:
But for electrons to have a "density", it means that you are "measuring" their location, ie, repeatedly collapsing the wave function, doesn't it? Otherwise, why would the orbital be in one particular orientation vs. another random one? You won't know where they are dense unless you are "looking". (I am putting the words in quotes because I understand these words mean something different in the quantum realm). I am thinking the hydrogen atoms here are acting as the "observers" and repeatedly collapsing the position wave function in that area.
The Schrodinger equation simply predicts where the electron locations will be most dense *when measured repeatedly*.

And has anyone heard about entanglement to explain this? I heard it once, here on this forum. But I was never able to pursue that conversation.

See, this is another example where, if you try to pick up QM right in the middle, without first learning and understanding the very basic, simplest level, you end up with this kind of situation. Your question here is no longer about "superposition" and "water molecules", but rather on the very basic understanding of what the solution to the Schrodinger equation means.

When we solve for, say, the hydrogen atoms, we get all these various quantum numbers corresponding to the various quantities such as energy, angular momentum, etc. I do not need to know where each electrons are located to verify their validity, because measuring the location of an electron "destroys" all other info about it other than its position value. And I will need to make many more measurements to get any kind of an average or spread.

Instead, I measure something else, and in this case, I can measure the energy state, etc... which is not the position, but rather an observable that does not commute with the position observable. This is where the understanding of the mathematics of commuting operators matter, something we teach in intro QM very early on. Measuring the energy state (i.e. the energy spectrum that you see when you look at light coming from an excited atom), will verify that (i) the solution to the Schrodinger equation is valid and (ii) that the position of the electrons are spread out the way the mathematics described.

The superposition of 1011 particles in the Delft/Stony Brook experiment did not directly measure that these particles are in a superposition of current directions, but rather, they measured the presence of the coherence energy gap, which can only be there if superposition exists. It is practically impossible to measure what each electron in the supercurrent is doing, and in this case, it isn't necessary, the same way it isn't necessary to know where the electrons are in the H-O bond. The superposition can be detected via another channel rather than making numerous direct measurements of position.

While advancement in STM and AFM have given us "images" of these bondings, and verify what we know, it is still the mathematics and the experiments that verify the mathematics that are still the foundation of all this.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and jim mcnamara
  • #7
ZapperZ said:
See, this is another example where, if you try to pick up QM right in the middle, without first learning and understanding the very basic, simplest level, you end up with this kind of situation. Your question here is no longer about "superposition" and "water molecules", but rather on the very basic understanding of what the solution to the Schrodinger equation means.

When we solve for, say, the hydrogen atoms, we get all these various quantum numbers corresponding to the various quantities such as energy, angular momentum, etc. I do not need to know where each electrons are located to verify their validity, because measuring the location of an electron "destroys" all other info about it other than its position value. And I will need to make many more measurements to get any kind of an average or spread.

Instead, I measure something else, and in this case, I can measure the energy state, etc... which is not the position, but rather an observable that does not commute with the position observable. This is where the understanding of the mathematics of commuting operators matter, something we teach in intro QM very early on. Measuring the energy state (i.e. the energy spectrum that you see when you look at light coming from an excited atom), will verify that (i) the solution to the Schrodinger equation is valid and (ii) that the position of the electrons are spread out the way the mathematics described.

The superposition of 1011 particles in the Delft/Stony Brook experiment did not directly measure that these particles are in a superposition of current directions, but rather, they measured the presence of the coherence energy gap, which can only be there if superposition exists. It is practically impossible to measure what each electron in the supercurrent is doing, and in this case, it isn't necessary, the same way it isn't necessary to know where the electrons are in the H-O bond. The superposition can be detected via another channel rather than making numerous direct measurements of position.

While advancement in STM and AFM have given us "images" of these bondings, and verify what we know, it is still the mathematics and the experiments that verify the mathematics that are still the foundation of all this.

Zz.

I see. This makes a little more sense. Thanks.
 
  • #8
Sophrosyne said:
for electrons to have a "density", it means that you are "measuring" their location, ie, repeatedly collapsing the wave function, doesn't it?
No. The density is the expectation value of the 1-particle charge density operator. No collapse is involved, not even measurement.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and vanhees71

FAQ: How to think of molecular orbitals quantum mechanically

1. What is the concept of molecular orbitals in quantum mechanics?

Molecular orbitals are mathematical functions that describe the distribution of electrons in a molecule. They are formed by combining the atomic orbitals of the individual atoms in the molecule. This approach allows for a more accurate description of the electron distribution in a molecule compared to the traditional Lewis structure model.

2. How are molecular orbitals calculated using quantum mechanics?

Molecular orbitals are calculated using the Schrödinger equation, which is a fundamental equation in quantum mechanics. This equation takes into account the positions and energies of the atoms in the molecule, as well as the interactions between them. Solving this equation yields the molecular orbitals and their corresponding energies.

3. What is the difference between bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals?

Bonding molecular orbitals are formed when the atomic orbitals of the individual atoms overlap in a constructive manner, resulting in a lower energy state and a stable molecule. Antibonding molecular orbitals, on the other hand, are formed when the atomic orbitals overlap in a destructive manner, resulting in a higher energy state and an unstable molecule.

4. How do molecular orbitals affect the physical and chemical properties of a molecule?

The distribution of electrons in molecular orbitals has a direct impact on the physical and chemical properties of a molecule. For example, the number and energy levels of the molecular orbitals determine the molecule's stability, reactivity, and electronic properties such as its absorption and emission spectra.

5. Can molecular orbitals be visualized?

Yes, molecular orbitals can be visualized using various methods such as molecular orbital diagrams, electron density plots, and molecular orbital animations. These visualizations help in understanding the electron distribution and the bonding/antibonding nature of the molecular orbitals in a molecule.

Similar threads

Back
Top