- #1
roflcopter
- 8
- 0
Consider Gauss's law: [tex]
\oint \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{a} =\frac{Q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0}[/tex] . Which of the following is true?
A. E Must be the electric field due to the enclosed charge
B. If q=0 then E=0 everywhere on the Gaussian surface
C. If the charge inside consists of an electric dipole, then the integral is zero
D. E is everywhere parallel to dA along the surface
E. If a charge is placed outside the surface, then it cannot affect E on the surface.
The attempt at a solution
I've ruled out B: Because I can have a point charge outside the Gaussian surface and so E is not zero necessarily at the surface since it will create an E field.
I've ruled out D: Because I can have a cube and E will not always be parallel to the 6 sides. Only case I can think of E being always parallel to dA is for a sphere.
I've ruled out E: Because this is similar to B. The external charge will create an E field of E=kQ/r^2.
So I say the answer is C since q(enclosed) will be zero leaving the integral equal to zero. Or, the answer could be A since isn't that kind of the definition of Gauss's law anyways? Or well, I guess not since we could have a Gaussian surface with no charge in it and a charge outside with E=kQ/r^2. So, the E vector in the integral is not necessarily due to the charge inside the Gaussian surface, right?
I don't think I'm supposed to have multiple answers though...not sure. I'm leaning more towards answer C.
\oint \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{a} =\frac{Q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0}[/tex] . Which of the following is true?
A. E Must be the electric field due to the enclosed charge
B. If q=0 then E=0 everywhere on the Gaussian surface
C. If the charge inside consists of an electric dipole, then the integral is zero
D. E is everywhere parallel to dA along the surface
E. If a charge is placed outside the surface, then it cannot affect E on the surface.
The attempt at a solution
I've ruled out B: Because I can have a point charge outside the Gaussian surface and so E is not zero necessarily at the surface since it will create an E field.
I've ruled out D: Because I can have a cube and E will not always be parallel to the 6 sides. Only case I can think of E being always parallel to dA is for a sphere.
I've ruled out E: Because this is similar to B. The external charge will create an E field of E=kQ/r^2.
So I say the answer is C since q(enclosed) will be zero leaving the integral equal to zero. Or, the answer could be A since isn't that kind of the definition of Gauss's law anyways? Or well, I guess not since we could have a Gaussian surface with no charge in it and a charge outside with E=kQ/r^2. So, the E vector in the integral is not necessarily due to the charge inside the Gaussian surface, right?
I don't think I'm supposed to have multiple answers though...not sure. I'm leaning more towards answer C.
Last edited: