- #36
mfb
Mentor
- 37,263
- 14,098
@cmb: Don't confuse "I don't know how it is done" with "it is unknown how it is done". Just because you are unaware of the research doesn't mean the research wouldn't exist. The tritium yield if you shoot neutrons into lithium is well-studied. How to extract the tritium efficiently is one of the things ITER will study. It doesn't need to produce all its tritium for that aspect, or even a significant fraction. If it can show that it could produce 8% of its tritium demand using 5% of the blanket area that is perfectly fine.
It wasn't about tritium breeding either.cmb said:I don't think the OP's question was about ITER
ITER aims at 10 minutes, DEMO at 2 hours. Tokamaks have to be pulsed, but the time between pulses can be very short if the magnets can ramp fast enough. Short enough and you can produce electricity continuously. A bit longer and you want some short-term on-site energy storage. The impact on the cost per kWh would be negligible. And it doesn't impact the way electricity is generated from fusion.cmb said:The additional dimension to the question is that if a future fusion power station were to operate in a pulsed mode, how long is the pulse/cycle time and what is the impact of that on generating power from it? If the future for a fusion power station is not a pulsed mode, then ITER can't really scientifically conclude much about continuous operation. So I don't think we know an answer to the OP's question, yet, and it's unclear if anyone really has a good idea about it.